Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James Hogg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$44k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$108kHealth$76kEducation$61kFood & Nutrition$6kHousing & Shelter$4kInternational$4kAnimals$3kReligion$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
$1,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$907k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS$15,350
LOGOS ACADEMY$9,000
LEG UP FARM$9,000
ADA JENKINS CENTER$6,500
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$1,000
HOFFMAN HOMES FOR YOUTH$1,000
HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE$500
210 COLLECTIVE$500
FEED NC$500
LIFEPATH CHRISTIAN MINISTRIES$350
NORTHERN CENTRAL RAILWAY OF YORK$300
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $105k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $15k → 12%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $11k → 12%THE CHRISTIAN MISSION: $1k → 9%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $11k → 12%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $7k → 10%COMMUNITY REACH: $500 → 9%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $11k → 12%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $6k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 12%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $6k → 10%SUSQUEHANNA SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 12%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $6k → 10%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $5k → 10%ADA JENKINS CENTER: $5k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$260k · 18 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

18 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
9

Total granted

$260k
$6k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
-12%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationFood & NutritionAnimalsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • KS
    KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $69k · revenue +27%
  • LU
    LEG UP FARM INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $62k · revenue +11%
  • LA
    LOGOS ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $61k · revenue +11%

Funded once

  • BA
    BELOVED ASHEVILLE
    one grant, 2024 · $1k · revenue 0%
  • MA
    Mooresville Area Christian Mission Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +62%
  • CE
    CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Church Women United

Jesus commanded, "love your neighbor as yourself." (mark 12:31) our ministry provides loving service to the poor and hungry. the organization will operate an ecumenical food pantry to serve those who need food assistance in york county and…

—
2
New Covenant Safe Haven

New Covenant Safe Haven is a Christian-based organization committed to uplifting and supporting individuals and families living in poverty within our community. Our primary mission is to provide essential services such as temporary shelter…

Human Services
3
Cabarrus Cooperative Christian Ministry

To respond to the growing need in our community by providing immediate assistance to residents of Concord, Kannapolis, and Cabarrus County, NC who are experiencing crisis in the areas of food, shelter or finances while providing them…

—
4
City Mission Society Inc

See schedule o description of our mission and vision.

Human Services
5
Urban Ministries of Durham Inc

Established in 1983, Urban Ministries of Durham provides case management to end people's homelessness, offer emergency shelter, free meals, groceries, clothing, referral to needed resources, workforce and life skills training, and…

—
6
The Hope Center Inc

Our mission is to provide comprehensive life-sustaining and life-rebuilding services that promote healing from substance use disorder, mental health disorders, and homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
7
Union Mission Ministries Inc

Union mission ministries, inc. is set apart by the spirit of god to preach the gospel and meet physical and emotional needs through out west virginia through the provision of shelter, clothing, food, counseling, and structured programs for…

Human Services
8
Rescue Missions Ministries Inc

Our mission is to meet, through the power of jesus christ, the spiritual, educational, emotional, physical, social, and vocational needs of the whole person so that those who are hurting may become fully functioning members of society. the…

—
9
Feed My Sheep Homeless Outreach

To provide food for the homeless

—
10
Fresh Start Alamance Inc

Charitable nonprofit providing assistance to individuals in need in Alamance County

Housing & Shelter
11
Union Gospel Mission Inc

The union gospel mission duluth is a welcoming christian nonprofit organization that serves as a refuge and is committed to nourishing peoples physical, spiritual, and social needs. through our on-site meal program, community housing…

—
12
Feeding Charlotte Inc

Feeding Charlotte rescues surplus, freshly prepared meals to reduce food waste and feed the hungry. We believe no food should be wasted while people go hungry in our community. To make this possible, we pickup unused, excess freshly…

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is York Union Rescue Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/15
Grantees still filing
7/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC: $68,750 · Human ServicesKEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INCAda Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc: $34,400 · Human ServicesAda Jenkins Families and Careers Development…+2 more: $1,500 · Human ServicesLEG UP FARM INC: $61,500 · AnimalsLEG UP FARM INCLOGOS ACADEMY: $60,500 · EducationLOGOS ACADEMY+1 more: $250 · EducationHOFFMAN HOMES FOR YOUTH: $10,400 · OtherHOFFMAN HOM…HOSPICE & PALLIATIVE CARE: $4,500 · OtherHOSPICE & P…CABARRUS PETS SOCIETY INC: $2,550 · OtherCABARRUS PE…Individual grant recipient: $2,000 · OtherIndividual …FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $1,300 · OtherCHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $1,000 · Other+9 more: $5,950 · Other+9 moreFEEDNC: $3,000 · Food & NutritionBAGS OF HOPE: $1,250 · Food & NutritionHope of Mooresville Inc: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $1,000 · Housing & ShelterYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $850 · Housing & ShelterSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,600 · Religion
Human Services$104,650Animals$61,500Education$60,750Other$27,700Food & Nutrition$4,250Housing & Shelter$3,850Religion$3,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetKEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC: $68,750 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLEG UP FARM INC: $61,500 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetLOGOS ACADEMY: $60,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAda Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc: $34,400 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $3,600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDNC: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHope of Mooresville Inc: $2,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBAGS OF HOPE: $1,250 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBELOVED ASHEVILLE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMooresville Area Christian Mission Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBELL SOCIALIZATION SERVICES INC: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY REACH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGLOBAL MINDS UNITED: $250 over 1y, 1.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KEYSTONE SERVICE SYSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds LEG UP FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds LOGOS ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Ada Jenkins Families and Careers Development Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds FEEDNC ↗
  • Who funds CABARRUS PETS SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Hope of Mooresville Inc ↗
  • Who funds BAGS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds BELOVED ASHEVILLE ↗
  • Who funds Mooresville Area Christian Mission Inc ↗
  • Who funds YORK UNION RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds BELL SOCIALIZATION SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY REACH INC ↗
  • Who funds GLOBAL MINDS UNITED ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

York County Community FoundationPA19.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: York County Community Foundation · The Arthur J and Lee R Glatfelter Foundation · Powder Mill Foundation · Airie Knipel Harry V and J William Warehime Foundation · Central Pennsylvania Food Bank · Foundation for the Carolinas · Bruce R & Madelyn G Snyder Foundation · Memorial Health Fund · United Way of York County · Rice Family Foundation · United Way of Greater Charlotte Inc · The Covia Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James Hogg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James Hogg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The James Hogg Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The James Hogg Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on James Hogg Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph