Skip to content

· Private foundation

The James and Sharon Maida Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
44
Grants FY2025still arriving
10
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$9.4MHealth$4.5MEnvironment$349kHousing & Shelter$86kReligion$51kScience & Tech$20kHuman Services$19kArts & Culture$14kOther$0
02FY2025 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k34 grants · $40k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $110k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $120k
  • $250k+4 grants · $2.3M
$1,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$16M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Lehigh University$1,014,407
RWJ Barnabus Health Care System$509,501
RWJ Barnabus Health Care System$508,453
Rutgers University Foundation$279,571
Make a Change World$120,000
MONMOUTH MEDICAL CTR$45,500
Lehigh University$28,667
We Care Solar$16,000
HABITAT for HUMANITY$10,200
Kutztown Univer of PA$10,000
Save Barnegat Bay$5,550
Rocking the Boat$5,000
Ocean Reef Chapel Foundation$4,500
St George Church$2,500
ALEX LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $700 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $700 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 11%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $500 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
NY
MA
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
VA
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$14M · 47 repeat orgs$432k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 33 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
39

Total granted

$14M
$428k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
0%

Still filing today

49%
26%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • LU
    LEHIGH UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +69%
  • WC
    WE CARE SOLAR
    5× · 2020–2025 · $82k · revenue +103%
  • OR
    OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $31k · revenue +560%

Funded once

  • L
    Lehigh
    one grant, 2022 · $375k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • AH
    American Heart Association Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $8k · revenue +33%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
4
Seton Hall University

Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education

—
5
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
6
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
8
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
9
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
10
Atlantic University Inc

Provide post-secondary education of excellence.

Education
11
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
Independent Colleges and Universities of New Jersey a Nj Nonprofit Corporation

The mission of the independent colleges and universities of new jersey, a new jersey non-profit corporation is to advance the interests of new jersey's independent, non-profit, public mission institutions of higher education by promoting…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Task Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

39 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 39 of the 95 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
35/39
Grantees still filing
24/39
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $6,348,974 · EducationLEHIGH UNIVERSITYRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,375,310 · EducationRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION+6 more: $49,780 · EducationRWJ Barnabas HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: $2,001,000 · OtherRWJ Barnabas HEALTH CARE SYSTEMRWJ Barnabus Health Care System: $1,572,708 · OtherRWJ Barnabus Health Care SystemLehigh: $375,000 · OtherLehighKutztown Univer of PA: $306,000 · OtherKutztown Univer of PA+69 more: $338,402 · Other+69 moreMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $749,920 · HealthWE CARE SOLAR: $81,620 · Health+3 more: $10,087 · HealthMAKE A CHANGE WORLD INC: $240,000 · EnvironmentSAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC: $27,370 · EnvironmentCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $19,600 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 · International+1 more: $500 · InternationalTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $7,100 · Food & NutritionPhilabundance: $7,000 · Food & NutritionTHE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY: $6,000 · Arts & CultureIndependence Seaport Museum: $3,100 · Arts & Culture
Education$8,774,064Other$4,593,110Health$841,627Environment$267,370International$21,100Food & Nutrition$14,100Arts & Culture$9,100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetLEHIGH UNIVERSITY: $6,348,974 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetRUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $2,375,310 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER: $749,920 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE A CHANGE WORLD INC: $240,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetWE CARE SOLAR: $81,620 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $70,200 over 8y, 7.3% of budgetOCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC: $27,370 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetROCKING THE BOAT INC: $25,580 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetCAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC: $19,600 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC: $14,100 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNT CARMEL GUILD OF TRENTON NJ: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc: $7,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPhilabundance: $7,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY: $6,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $3,900 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetIndependence Seaport Museum: $3,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLUCKY 7 ANGELS: $2,500 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $2,387 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSailing Foundation of Barnegat Bay Inc: $2,175 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD CORPORATION: $1,600 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetBARNEGAT BAY YACHT RACING ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGEL 34: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOMANSPACE INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRutgers Hillel Corporation: $550 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOPEWELL VALLEY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTHERN OCEAN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOCEAN REEF COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOMERSET CHILDREN'S CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LEHIGH UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds RUTGERS UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MONMOUTH MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MAKE A CHANGE WORLD INC ↗
  • Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds OCEAN REEF CHAPEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVE BARNEGAT BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKING THE BOAT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT CARMEL GUILD OF TRENTON NJ ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds TASK Inc Trenton Area Soup Kitchen Inc ↗
  • Who funds Philabundance ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Independence Seaport Museum ↗
  • Who funds LUCKY 7 ANGELS ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds Sailing Foundation of Barnegat Bay Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of New JerseyNJ19.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of New Jersey · Switlik Foundation · The Paul and Dana Magno Family Foundatio · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · Verizon Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The James and Sharon Maida Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The James and Sharon Maida Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Mount Carmel Guild of Trenton Nj: 100% of income from government
  • Womanspace Inc: 47% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Rutgers University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The James and Sharon Maida Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The James and Sharon Maida Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 95 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on James and Sharon Maida’s filings →

More from the funding graph