Skip to content

· Public charity

The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to provide new and gently used shoes, socks, backpacks, school supplies and athletic gear to children and families in need living in south florida.

$196k
Granted FY2021
1
Grants FY2021
1
States reached
$100
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2021.

Youth Development$500Religion$250
02FY2021 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $100, the rows itemized in this filing. The $196,402 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $196,302 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$100
Median grant
1
States reached
$467k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–21) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FIRST HAITIAN BAPTIST CHRUCH: $250 → 11%SPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK: $200 → 11%SPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK: $100 → 11%SPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK: $100 → 11%SPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK: $100 → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 100% of The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 100% of the giving stays in FL; by stated purpose, 0%.

The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Central Florida Childrens Home

To provide homes for disadvantaged children.

Human Services
2
Cape Coral for the Children Inc
Youth Development
3
Boca Helping Hands Inc

Boca helping hands, inc. is a community-supported not-for-profit organization, incorporated in the state of florida in 2000, established to address increasing food insecurity and other challenges faced by the underservedcommunities in palm…

Food & Nutrition
4
Hogar Crea International of Florida
Health
5
Kids with Kindness Inc

Do acts of kindness for the community.

—
6
Arriving Home Inc
Religion
7
Federation of Families of Florida Inc

Provides support to, advocates for, and educates families regarding the system of care for at-risk children and educates at-risk youth through peer support and

Human Services
8
Habitat Housing Solutions Inc

Habitat housing solutions, inc. is a florida nonprofit corporation founded in august 2013 and is a community housing development organization ("chdo") that builds affordable homes for qualified low-income families in palm beach county.

Housing & Shelter
9
Hope South Florida Inc

We exist to be a hope-filled community, keeping families together, providing compassionate care, and guiding and equipping those we serve on a path to holistic life change.

Human Services
10
Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment
11
Family Service Agency of Bay County Inc

Provides for the basic needs of families and individuals in bay county, florida

Human Services
12
Family Promise of NorthCentral Palm Beach County

Family Promise North Central Palm Beach County is responding to the ongoing crisis of family homelessness in Palm Beach County, Florida by uniting with our community partners to help local homeless children by empowering their families to…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ywca of Palm Beach County; the most unlike its peers is Nurse Assistant Training School Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK INC: $500 over 8y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPIRIT OF GIVING NETWORK INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Publix Super Markets Charities IncFL18× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Jim Moran Foundation Inc · The Batchelor Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of Broward Inc · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · Orange Bowl Committee Inc · The Chamber of Nonprofit Health and Human Agencies in Palm Beach County Inc · Palm Beach County Food Bank Inc · Lost Tree Village Charitable Foundation · Children's Healthcare Charity Inc · Quantum Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Jacob S Zweig Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 2 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2021, released 2021. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $336k of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2021, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jacob S Zweig’s filings →

    More from the funding graph