Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Jackey Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$320k
Granted FY2024still arriving
18
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$112k
Largest
01What it funds
0185% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$2.0MEducation$174kPhilanthropy$109kHuman Services$25kRecreation & Sports$16kArts & Culture$12kHealth$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 18 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $267k
$1,500
Median grant
9
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP - CEF SOUTHBAY$112,000
STONY BROOK FOUNDATION$100,000
NEW LIFE BAPTIST CHURCH$54,600
FORDHAM UNIVERSITY$25,000
VIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$15,000
WIGGINS BAY FOUNDATION$3,738
ARTIS NAPLES$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,000
DAILY AUDIO BIBLE$1,500
NY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL - HYPERTENSION CENTER$1,000
PALM BEACH FOR CHRIST$500
Individual grant recipient$500
ST MATHEWS HOUSE$400
TUNNELS TO TOWERS FOUNDATION$400
EAST MORICHES COMMUNITY AMBULANCE$200
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $15k → 17%DELIVERING GOOD INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.2M · 26 repeat orgs$147k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +15% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
21

Total granted

$2.2M
$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+12%

Still filing today

50%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $116k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationReligionArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterHealthHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FU
    Fordham University
    6× · 2017–2024 · $150k · revenue +47%
  • TC
    TEEN CHALLENGE INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $11k · revenue +37%
  • EM
    East Moriches Hook & Ladder Co No 1 Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • University of Arizona Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +109%
  • SW
    SAMUEL WAXMAN RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • FA
    FOR ALL WHO FIGHT INC FKA WE FIGHT LIKE GIRLS INC
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -86%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
5
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
The Baruch College Fund

The baruch college fund is an organization engaged in generating, encouraging and promoting the educational welfare of the students of the bernard m. baruch college of the city university of new york.

Education
7
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Trinity Broadcasting of New York

A church whose primary purpose is to spread the gospel of jesus christ to the world

Religion
12
Manhattan University

Manhattan university is an independent catholic instituion of higher learning that embraces qualified men and women of all faiths, cultures, and traditions. the mission of manhattan university is to provide a contemporary, person-centered…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Delivering Good Inc; the most unlike its peers is Palm Beach for Christ Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
13/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP - CEF SOUTHBAY: $1,618,957 · OtherCHILD EVANGELISM FELLOWSHIP - CEF SOUTHBAYNEW LIFE BAPTIST CHURCH: $361,667 · OtherNEW LIFE BAPTIST CHURCH+33 more: $98,956 · OtherFordham University: $150,000 · EducationFordham Univ…STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · EducationSTONY BROOK …University of Arizona Foundation: $10,000 · Education+2 more: $1,450 · EducationDELIVERING GOOD INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesARTIS-NAPLES INC: $8,226 · Arts & CultureCOLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $250 · Arts & CultureDAILY AUDIO BIBLE: $3,000 · ReligionSTRAWBERRY MINISTRIES: $1,500 · ReligionPALM BEACH FOR CHRIST INC: $750 · ReligionMODELS FOR CHRIST: $250 · ReligionFOR ALL WHO FIGHT INC FKA WE FIGHT LIKE GIRLS INC: $5,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $200 · HealthEast Moriches Hook & Ladder Co No 1 Inc: $4,400 · Public Safety & DisasterTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $750 · Public Safety & Disaster
Other$2,079,580Education$261,450Human Services$25,000Arts & Culture$8,976Religion$5,500Health$5,200Public Safety & Disaster$5,150

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFordham University: $150,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDELIVERING GOOD INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEEN CHALLENGE INC: $11,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARTIS-NAPLES INC: $8,226 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFOR ALL WHO FIGHT INC FKA WE FIGHT LIKE GIRLS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetEast Moriches Hook & Ladder Co No 1 Inc: $4,400 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetDAILY AUDIO BIBLE: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMBULANCE COMMITTEE OF THE MORICHES INC: $2,250 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSTRAWBERRY MINISTRIES: $1,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPALM BEACH FOR CHRIST INC: $750 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFRESH AIR FUND: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC: $400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE GUILD INTERNATIONAL INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY BALLET INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds STONY BROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DELIVERING GOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
  • Who funds FOR ALL WHO FIGHT INC FKA WE FIGHT LIKE GIRLS INC ↗
  • Who funds East Moriches Hook & Ladder Co No 1 Inc ↗
  • Who funds DAILY AUDIO BIBLE ↗
  • Who funds AMBULANCE COMMITTEE OF THE MORICHES INC ↗
  • Who funds STRAWBERRY MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds JUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PALM BEACH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds FRESH AIR FUND ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBUS CITIZENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Jackey Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Jackey Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Jackey’s filings →

    More from the funding graph