· Private foundation
The Jack Ingebritson Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k29 grants · $626k
- $50k–250k27 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| KID IN THE CORNER | $50,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD MINISTRIES | $50,000 |
| SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| HONOR HEALTHCARE | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| PRESCOTT AREA SHELTER SERVICES | $50,000 |
| TREVORS VISION | $50,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $50,000 |
| CIRCLE THE CITY | $50,000 |
| LAUNCHPAD TEEN CENTER | $50,000 |
| COALITION FOR COMPASSIONATE JUSTICE | $50,000 |
| ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| TIA FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION (LFAF) | $50,000 |
| STUDENT EXPEDITION PROGRAM (STEP) | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
59 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $355k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Teach for America Inc7× · 2018–2024 · $340k · revenue +1%- TVTREVORS VISION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $295k · revenue +15% · 27% of their budget
- CTCIRCLE THE CITY7× · 2017–2024 · $285k · revenue +372%
Funded once
- AHAZ HEART FOUNDATION INITIATIVEone grant, 2018 · $25k
- FCFLORENCE CRITTENDONone grant, 2021 · $25k
- PSPENDERGAST SCHOOL DISTRICTone grant, 2018 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…
Foster360 equips former clients of the foster care system to break the cycle of homelessness and abuse.
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.
Arizona Cancer Foundation for Children provides social, emotional, and financial support to families managing the health and well-being of a loved one with pediatric cancer.
Pro-Choice Arizona centers abolition and reproductive justice values to prioritize community needs. We advance reproductive equity, pregnancy and family justice, and abortion access for all folks living in Arizona through direct service…
Enable families on the precipice of homelessness, or currently experiencing homelessness, to sustain or gain employment, independent housing and self-sufficiency.
To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.
The arizona center for afterschool excellence is dedicated to the enhancement of child and youth development and educational achievement through quality afterschool programming.
We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.
To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone
Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is Southwest Kids Cancer Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 98 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds TREVORS VISION INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE THE CITY ↗
- Who funds LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STEP STUDENT EXPEDITION PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds The Launch Pad Teen Center ↗
- Who funds Prescott Area Shelter Services Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDING MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds THE TIA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE MUSEUM OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds SUPPORT MY CLUB ↗
- Who funds SAVE THE FAMILY FOUNDATION OF ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds KID IN THE CORNER ↗
- Who funds BE A LEADER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FOSTER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN FAMILY CARE AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds Neighborhood Ministries Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILD CRISIS ARIZONA ↗
- Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
- Who funds PRESCOTT COMMUNITY CUPBOARD FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds SCHOOL CONNECT INC ↗
- Who funds CREIGHTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Grand Canyon University ↗
- Who funds UNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds Kids in Focus ↗
- Who funds ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
- Who funds SAVING AMY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · Thunderbirds Charities · Ingebritson Family Foundation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · The Pakis Family Foundation · Burton Family Foundation · American Express Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · Phoenix Suns Charities Inc · Phoenix Community Development and Investment Corporation · Margaret T Morris Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jack Ingebritson Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jack Ingebritson Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Jack Ingebritson Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.