Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Ingebritson Family Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc.

$365k
Granted FY2020
15
Grants FY2020
2
States reached
$50k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of Ingebritson Family Foundation’s FY2021 grant dollars went to Arizona Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2021 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year Ingebritson Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 14 organizations, $327k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
17
15
18
13
19
14
20
0
21

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172021.

Philanthropy$649kEducation$222kHealth$212kYouth Development$210kInternational$175kAnimals$95kHousing & Shelter$55kCommunity Improvement$55kOther$0
02FY2020 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 15 grants below total $327,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $364,500 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $37,500 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k4 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $257k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$25,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FEEDING MATTERS INC$50,000
SUPPORT MY CLUB$40,000
STEP STUDENT EXPEDITION PROGRAM$40,000
TIA FOUNDATION$40,000
THE LAUNCH PAD TEEN CENTER$30,000
ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$25,000
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$25,000
LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION$25,000
THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT$12,000
BE A LEADER FOUNDATION$10,000
CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE$10,000
TRANQUILITY TRAIL ANIMAL SANCTUARY INC$5,000
UNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS$5,000
PRESCOTT AREA SHELTER SERVICES$5,000
33 BUCKETS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $197k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $40k → 11%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $40k → 11%Support My Club: $25k → 11%SUPPORT MY CLUB: $20k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $25k → 11%CIRCLE THE CITY: $25k → 11%Circle the City: $10k → 11%THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT: $12k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$840k · 10 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2020, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$840k
$184k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+52%
+19%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 68% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentAnimalsHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SS
    STEP STUDENT EXPEDITION PROGRAM INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $160k · revenue +81%
  • CT
    CIRCLE THE CITY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $60k · revenue +372%
  • LF
    LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $45k · revenue +709%

Funded once

  • FC
    FIGHTER COUNTRY FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +317%
  • AW
    ALL WALKS PROJECT
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • SF
    SEEDS FOR AUTISMgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $17k · revenue +47%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Lodestar Charitable Foundation

To perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the arizona community foundation, an az nonprofit corporation, so long as the arizona community foundation, inc. remains a qualified organization.

2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
100 Club of Arizona

To provide immediate financial assistance to families of public safety officers and firefighters who are seriously injured or killed in the line of duty, and to provide resources to enhance their safety and welfare.

4
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
5
Home Matters to Arizona

Home matters to arizona is the first statewide home matters initiative focused on a new generation of affordable housing, connected communities, and healthier individuals, families, and economies. we add housing units while encouraging…

Housing & Shelter
6
The Arizona Pet Project

The arizona pet project creates systemic change and provides resources, so no families are forced to balance their own basic needs of food, shelter, and safety and the needs of their companion animals, often the only meaningful connection…

Animals
7
Arc of Arizona Inc

Advocates for the rights and participation of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. together with our network of members and affiliated chapters, we improve systems of support, connect families, inspire communication,…

8
Arizona Family Health Partnership

To make sexual and reproductive healthcare accessible to everyone

9
Tucson Audubon Society

Inspire people to enjoy and protect birds through recreation, education, conservation, and restoration of the environment, upon which we all depend.

Animals
10
International Aids Vaccine Initiative Inc

A nonprofit scientific research organization that develops vaccines and antibodies for hiv, tuberculosis, and emerging infectious diseases.

International
11
Greater Phoenix Leadership Inc

To improve the greater phoenix area and the state of arizona by bringing together talent, resources and leadership to create action on priority issues.

12
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is Feathers Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyVeterans Support Organizati…Arizona Business & Policy A…College-Prep Charter SchoolsChristian Missionary and Ou…Philanthropic FoundationsAnimal Rescue and ShelterFamily Homelessness Prevent…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number29%0%<5yr17%7%5–10yr19%43%10–20yr14%25%20–35yr10%14%35–55yr10%11%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value29%0%<5yr17%1%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr14%17%20–35yr10%51%35–55yr10%3%55yr+

The field is 29% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 6% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
6%
2/34
the rest of the field
17%
3,100/18,444

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
23/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $648,641 · PhilanthropyARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION+1 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropySUPPORT MY CLUB — $125,000 · Human ServicesSUPPORT MY CLU…CIRCLE THE CITY — $60,000 · Human ServicesCIRCLE THE CIT…CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesCANINE COMPANI…THE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT — $12,000 · Human ServicesSTEP STUDENT EXPEDITION PROGRAM INC — $160,000 · EducationSTEP STUDENT E…Teach for America Inc — $30,000 · EducationTeach for Amer…SEEDS FOR AUTISM — $17,279 · EducationSEEDS FOR AUTI…FRANKLIN PHONETIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $12,000 · EducationNorthbridge College Success Program — $10,000 · EducationFEEDING MATTERS INC — $165,000 · HealthFEEDING MAT…SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $10,000 · HealthSOUTHWEST A…THE TIA FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 · InternationalTHE TIA FOU…International Rescue Committee INC — $25,000 · InternationalInternation…YOUNG LIFE — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Launch Pad Teen Center — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentFIGHTER COUNTRY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Public BenefitBE A LEADER FOUNDATION — $10,000 · Public BenefitYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,000 · OtherYAVAPAI HU…FEATHERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · OtherFEATHERS F…LOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION — $45,000 · OtherLOCAL FIRS…ALL WALKS PROJECT — $20,000 · OtherALL WALKS …MISSION CREATE — $10,000 · OtherMISSION CR…FIRST PLACE AZ — $10,000 · OtherFIRST PLAC…+7 more — $35,000 · Other+7 more
Philanthropy$658,641Human Services$232,000Education$229,279Health$175,000International$175,000Youth Development$85,000Public Benefit$60,000Other$165,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetARIZONA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $648,641 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFEEDING MATTERS INC — $165,000 over 4y, 6.6% of budgetSTEP STUDENT EXPEDITION PROGRAM INC — $160,000 over 4y, 8.3% of budgetTHE TIA FOUNDATION INC — $150,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetSUPPORT MY CLUB — $125,000 over 4y, 13% of budgetCIRCLE THE CITY — $60,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFIGHTER COUNTRY FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetLOCAL FIRST ARIZONA FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetYOUNG LIFE — $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC — $35,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYAVAPAI HUMANE SOCIETY — $35,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $30,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WELCOME TO AMERICA PROJECT — $12,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetFRANKLIN PHONETIC CHARTER SCHOOL INC — $12,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER HOUSTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNorthbridge College Success Program — $10,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBE A LEADER FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetMISSION CREATE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER SCOTTSDALE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS - ARIZONA CACTUS-PINE COUNCIL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFEATHERS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetFIRST PLACE AZ — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED ANIMAL FRIENDS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget33 BUCKETS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetPrescott Area Shelter Services Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR THE PROTECTION OF MUSTANGS AND BURROS — $5,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Arizona Community FoundationAZ39.4× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Arizona Community Foundation · The Jack Ingebritson Foundation Inc · Burton Family Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust · The Pakis Family Foundation · Thunderbirds Charities · Phoenix Community Development and Investment Corporation · The Foundation for Community and Health Advancement · American Express Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · Fiesta Events Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ingebritson Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Ingebritson Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Ingebritson Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph