Skip to content

· Private foundation

The J W and Sandra L Mitchell Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$3.8MHealth$1.9MPhilanthropy$991kYouth Development$895kInternational$260kAnimals$177kArts & Culture$80kReligion$35kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $318k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $709k
$37,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CASA TERESA$150,000
BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE$110,000
SHARE OURSELVES$100,000
CIRCLE 1000 HOAG FAMILY$100,000
ST JUDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$67,000
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF$65,000
SENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIES$60,000
MARIPOSA WOMEN AND FAMILY$57,000
SALVATION ARMY ORANGE$46,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$40,000
CHARTER 100 INCORPORATED$37,000
Individual grant recipient$36,000
SHRINERS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$24,000
MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION$23,000
WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT$22,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $802k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 7% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $20k → 11%PARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL: $15k → 14%PARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL: $10k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 11%PARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL INC: $3k → 14%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $1k → 11%SHARE OURSELVES: $100k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $100k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $100k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $100k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $100k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $100k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $75k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $50k → 10%THE ELI HOME: $12k → 10%THE ELI HOME: $11k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
CA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$7.4M · 35 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +83% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

35 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

35
7

Total granted

$7.4M
$160k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
-2%

Still filing today

46%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $129k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthAnimalsInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CT
    CASA TERESA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +49%
  • Share Our Selves Corporation
    8× · 2017–2024 · $725k · revenue +63%
  • CH
    CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY
    2× · 2018–2022 · $655k · revenue +105%

Funded once

  • MW
    MARIPOSA WOMEN FAMILY CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $55k
  • HS
    HEALTHY SMILES FOR KIDS OF
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • MA
    MAKE A WISH OC INLAND EMPIRE
    one grant, 2022 · $22k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
2
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
3
Acadia General Hospital Inc

The organization provides medical care to improve, maintain, and restore the health of the people in the communities we serve.

Health
4
Asante Physician Partners

Asante physician partners is a multi-specialty provider group, with approximately 400 providers, that is headquartered in medford, oregon, and has 25 clinic locations in southern oregon. asante physician partners was established for the…

Health
5
Children's Healthcare of California

The primary exempt purpose of children's healthcare of california includes without limitation the receipt of distributions and grants for the making of distributions and grants to children's hospital of orange county (choc) and to…

Health
6
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
7
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
8
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
9
Asante

Asante exists to provide quality healthcare services in a compassionate manner, valued by the communities we serve.

Health
10
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
11
The California Channel

To distribute public affairs and other educational information in order to create an electronic bridge between californians and their public officials, and, in the process educate a new generation of voting citizens and civic leaders who…

—
12
City of Hope

City of Hope's mission is to make hope a reality for all touched by cancer and diabetes. PLEASE SEE SCHEDULE O FOR A CONTINUATION OF OUR MISSION

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Orange County Community Foundation; the most unlike its peers is The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
17/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPE: $810,000 · OtherBOYS HOPE GIRLS HOPECIRCLE 1000 HOAG FAMILY: $550,000 · OtherCIRCLE 1000 HOAG FAMILYCIRCLE 1000 HOAG FAMILY CANCER INSTITUTE: $325,000 · OtherCIRCLE 1000 HOAG FAMILY CANCER INSTITUTESENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIES: $325,000 · OtherSENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIESCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF: $295,000 · OtherCHILDRENS HOSPITAL OFSALVATION ARMY ORANGE: $197,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY ORANGECHARTER 100 INCORPORATED: $134,000 · Other+25 more: $1,054,400 · Other+25 moreCASA TERESA INC: $1,275,000 · Human ServicesCASA TERESA INCShare Our Selves Corporation: $725,000 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves CorporationWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $110,000 · Human Services+3 more: $77,100 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $655,000 · HealthCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $364,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S …MARIPOSA WOMEN AND FAMILY CENTER: $212,000 · HealthMARIPOSA WOMEN AND …The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $191,000 · HealthThe Susan G Komen B…ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $522,000 · PhilanthropyMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $260,000 · InternationalTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $88,510 · AnimalsAlley Cat Allies Inc: $33,000 · Animals+1 more: $3,000 · Animals
Other$3,690,400Human Services$2,187,100Health$1,422,000Philanthropy$522,000International$260,000Animals$124,510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCASA TERESA INC: $1,275,000 over 8y, 6.9% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $725,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY: $655,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $522,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $364,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetSENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIES: $325,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMARIPOSA WOMEN AND FAMILY CENTER: $212,000 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetThe Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc: $191,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $110,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $88,510 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY: $85,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $33,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL INC: $28,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetAmerican Brain Tumor Association: $27,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ELI HOME INC: $23,100 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPETSMART CHARITIES INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CASA TERESA INC ↗
  • Who funds Share Our Selves Corporation ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ORANGE COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SENECA FAMILY OF AGENCIES ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIPOSA WOMEN AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ORANGE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS FOR POTENTIAL INC ↗
  • Who funds American Brain Tumor Association ↗
  • Who funds CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ELI HOME INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Orange County Community FoundationCA19.4× affinity7 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Orange County Community Foundation · Hoag Memorial Hospital Presbyterian · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · O L Halsell Foundation · Orange County's United Way · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Endowment Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The J W and Sandra L Mitchell Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The J W and Sandra L Mitchell Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The J W and Sandra L Mitchell Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The J W and Sandra L Mitchell Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on J W and Sandra L Mitchell’s filings →

More from the funding graph