Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ivan W and Alma E Martin Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$171k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.4MReligion$541kInternational$359kPublic Safety & Disaster$305kCrime & Legal$300kFood & Nutrition$189kArts & Culture$143kHealth$110kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $80k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$536k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE VALLEY LIGHTHOUSE$85,000
REMEMBER THE POOR INC$30,000
BLESSINGS OF HOPE$20,000
THE POTTERS HOUSE$20,000
HEARN HOUSE$10,000
WE CARE PROGRAM$6,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $385k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $100k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $50k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $30k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $30k → 12%PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $20k → 12%DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.2M · 13 repeat orgs$229k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
10

Total granted

$3.2M
$219k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
+13%

Still filing today

62%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Food & NutritionInternationalHuman ServicesEducationCrime & LegalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +148%
  • RT
    REMEMBER THE POOR INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $355k · revenue +67% · 48% of their budget
  • PC
    PLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE
    7× · 2017–2023 · $305k · revenue +164%

Funded once

  • OI
    ORGANICEYE INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue -43%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • RT
    RESTORATION TUTORING SERVICES
    one grant, 2017 · $31k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
A Christian Food Pantry Inc

Serve food to families and individuals in need.

—
2
Fathers Farm

safe housing, life skill training, and Christian discipleship for those who come from drug treatment or incarceration

Health
3
Paducah Interfaith Ministry Inc

Food, shelter & emergency assistance to individuals

Human Services
4
Pardoned by Christ

To restore lives affected by incarceration. To reach out to people affected by incarceration, who will receive the love and provision that is found in Jesus Christ. To restore individuals and their families to our communities through…

Crime & Legal
5
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
6
Washington Prayer Coalition

to spread the gospel to the world by planting and serving churches, training local Christian leaders and to transform the world through prayer,

Religion
7
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
8
Pennsylvania Certified Organic

To uphold and advance organic principles and practices through certification, advocacy, and technical support. we envision a world where agriculture systems prioritize health, ecological balance, fairness and care. our values recognize the…

Food & Nutrition
9
Partners in Development Worldwide

Train ministers, lay people and students who are involved at any level of ministry in small or large churches at local, national, and international levels. We train to go into the world and spread the gospel by helping people meet their…

International
10
Pittsburgh Pastoral Institute

To enhance the health of individuals, families, and communities through the interfaith ministry of counseling and education that integrates the resources of faith and the behavioral sciences.

Religion
11
Wedontwaste Inc

We Dont Waste increases food access and protects the planet by rescuing and repurposing food, while educating and advocating to increase food security and decrease food waste.

Food & Nutrition
12
Practical Shepherding Inc

To train and equip pastors worldwide with practical ministry resources.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pennsylvania Adult and Teen Challenge; the most unlike its peers is Prison Fellowship International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VALLEY LIGHTHOUSE: $891,978 · OtherVALLEY LIGHTHOUSEBLESSINGS OF HOPE: $480,747 · OtherBLESSINGS OF HOPEFAMILY CIRCLE MINISTRIES INC: $160,000 · OtherFAMILY CIRCLE MINISTRIES INCTHE POTTERS HOUSE: $143,000 · OtherTHE POTTERS HOUSEWE CARE PROGRAM: $98,000 · Other+7 more: $231,000 · Other+7 moreREMEMBER THE POOR INC: $354,950 · InternationalREMEMBER THE POOR INCPLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE: $305,000 · InternationalPLAIN COMPASSION CRIS…+1 more: $4,000 · InternationalPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $380,000 · Human ServicesPENNSYLVANIA…+1 more: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC: $105,000 · Food & NutritionORGANICEYE INC: $50,000 · Food & NutritionPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: $24,000 · Food & NutritionTHE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $140,000 · Crime & LegalPENNSYLVANIA ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE: $40,000 · HealthNORTHERN DAUPHIN COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $15,000 · Education
Other$2,004,725International$663,950Human Services$385,000Food & Nutrition$189,000Crime & Legal$140,000Health$40,000Education$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE: $380,000 over 8y, 6.7% of budgetREMEMBER THE POOR INC: $354,950 over 9y, 48% of budgetPLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE: $305,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetFAMILY CIRCLE MINISTRIES INC: $160,000 over 2y, 48% of budgetPRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL: $140,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC: $105,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetWE CARE PROGRAM: $98,000 over 8y, 1.4% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE: $24,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetNORTHERN DAUPHIN COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $15,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetTHE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetDOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAfrican Leadership Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA FAMILY INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds REMEMBER THE POOR INC ↗
  • Who funds PLAIN COMPASSION CRISIS RESPONSE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CIRCLE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PRISON FELLOWSHIP INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds THE CORNUCOPIA INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds WE CARE PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ORGANICEYE INC ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE ↗
  • Who funds PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN DAUPHIN COUNTY CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE WESTON A PRICE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DOWNTOWN DAILY BREAD ↗
  • Who funds African Leadership Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationPA13.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ivan W and Alma E Martin Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ivan W and Alma E Martin Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ivan W and Alma E Martin Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph