Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The IV Fund

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$4.1M
Granted FY2025still arriving
56
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$830k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Philanthropy$4.8MArts & Culture$2.0MRecreation & Sports$1.7MCrime & Legal$1.4MHealth$1.3MCivil Rights$1.2MCommunity Improvement$664kPublic Benefit$606kOther$0
02FY2025 · 56 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $55k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $538k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+5 grants · $2.3M
$25,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN GIFT FUND$830,000
FIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTS$650,000
PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING$300,000
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC$250,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$250,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND$200,000
PROPUBLICA INC$150,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$140,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO$80,000
THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC$75,000
THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND$75,000
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$75,000
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY$60,000
FIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTS$50,000
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $326k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FREEDOM READS: $25k → 12%HOPE CENTER AT PULLEN: $2k → 8%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $5k → 17%HOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC: $5k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $75k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $50k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $30k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $25k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $23k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $21k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $20k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $3k → 17%THE GATHERING PLACE: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
DE
NC
DC
LA
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 29% of The IV Fund’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The IV Fundlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 5.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.6M · 53 repeat orgs$137k to everyone else

53 repeat relationships — 33 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
21

Total granted

$9.6M
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+110%

Still filing today

77%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $47k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationCrime & LegalArts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Northwestern University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +41%
  • FC
    FIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $950k · revenue +461%
  • TM
    THE MANAGEMENT CENTER
    7× · 2017–2023 · $653k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue +5%
  • NU
    NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY STUDENT ENRICHMENT SERVICES
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • PU
    PRINCETON UNIVERSITY-LEWIS CENTER OF THE ARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $10k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Public Media Nj Inc

To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse

Arts & Culture
2
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
4
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture
5
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
6
Partnership for Public Service Inc

Making our government work better is a daunting task, and we are a small organization seeking to transform a government that employs millions of civilians and manages trillions of dollars in taxpayer revenue needed to protect public…

Employment
7
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
City Report Inc

CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

Arts & Culture
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Nashville Public Radio

Nashville public radio's mission is to be the most trusted & independent nashville voice, connecting our communities through non-partisan journalism, compelling storytelling, civil conversation and music discovery.

Arts & Culture
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pro Publica Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nassau Cooperative Nursery School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyJewish Community Organizati…Community Arts CentersAddiction Recovery ServicesPregnancy Support ServicesChristian Missionary Organi…Food Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%28%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%3%20–35yr13%23%35–55yr16%49%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/66
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,499

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 86 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
47/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

AMERICAN GIFT FUND — $3,235,254 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN GIFT FUNDJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $1,267,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELANDASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $251,000 · Philanthropy+4 more — $105,400 · PhilanthropyFIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTS — $950,000 · OtherFIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTSTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $306,400 · OtherTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATIONTRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY — $235,600 · OtherNORTHWESTERN MEDILL SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM — $165,000 · OtherNORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY COUNSELING & PSYCHOLOGICAL SERVICES — $155,000 · OtherPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING — $600,000 · OtherPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTIN…THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC — $475,000 · OtherTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INCTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $260,000 · OtherTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $284,400 · OtherTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC+43 more — $1,047,800 · Other+43 moreNorthwestern University — $1,671,500 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern…AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $650,000 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC — $533,600 · Civil RightsAMERICAN …+4 more — $51,600 · Civil RightsTHE MANAGEMENT CENTER — $653,000 · EducationHOMEFRONT INC — $210,000 · EducationBARD COLLEGE — $109,800 · EducationSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC — $40,400 · Education+5 more — $35,100 · EducationAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $393,000 · HealthFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $155,400 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $133,000 · Health+1 more — $15,400 · HealthPenland School Of Craft — $326,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC — $216,800 · Arts & CultureWHYY INC — $43,700 · Arts & CultureTOWN HALL FOUNDATION INC — $36,600 · Arts & Culture+3 more — $15,400 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$4,858,854Other$4,479,200Recreation & Sports$1,671,500Civil Rights$1,235,200Education$1,048,300Health$696,800Arts & Culture$638,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAMERICAN GIFT FUND — $3,235,254 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetNorthwestern University — $1,671,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND — $1,267,200 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetFIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTS — $950,000 over 9y, 11% of budgetTHE MANAGEMENT CENTER — $653,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC — $650,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING — $600,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC — $533,600 over 8y, 7.5% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC — $475,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION — $393,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPenland School Of Craft — $326,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $284,400 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTHE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND — $260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $251,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $216,800 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHOMEFRONT INC — $210,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC — $155,400 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM — $136,800 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetTHE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK — $135,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO — $133,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC — $122,900 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE — $109,800 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC — $90,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $73,800 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetIDEASTREAM — $59,200 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC — $53,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWHYY INC — $43,700 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC — $40,400 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTOWN HALL FOUNDATION INC — $36,600 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetPEMA CHODRON FOUNDATION — $30,200 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetKidpower of Colorado Inc — $24,400 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetInjustice Watch NFP — $22,600 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetCENTURION MINISTRIES INC — $22,600 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBELLEFAIRE JEWISH CHILDREN'S BUREAU — $15,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $15,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAKER LAKES REGIONAL NATURE CENTER DBA NATURE CENTER AT SHAKER LAKES — $13,600 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PROMISE OF JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $10,800 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetNEW ALTERNATIVES FOR CHILDREN INC — $10,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF THE WESTERN RESERVE INC — $10,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWEGIVEASHARE Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTRACE MEDIA INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED JEWISH FEDERATION OF PRINCETON MERCER BUCKS INC — $5,400 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMCCARTER THEATRE COMPANY — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRINCETON DAY SCHOOL INC — $5,400 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUNDS TRUE FOUNDATION — $4,600 over 3y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN GIFT FUND ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF CLEVELAND ↗
  • Who funds FIREBIRD COMMUNITY ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE MANAGEMENT CENTER ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OHIO FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MARSHALL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds Penland School Of Craft ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC ↗
  • Who funds HOMEFRONT INC ↗
  • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds LAND TOGETHER DBA INSIGHT GARDEN PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds THE HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER OHIO ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CLEVELAND FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds THE BAIL PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds IDEASTREAM ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR ALTERNATIVE SENTENCING AND EMPLOYMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CLEVELAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WHYY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO STUDY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds TOWN HALL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds PEMA CHODRON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM READS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kidpower of Colorado Inc ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Princeton Area Commun…Bristol-Myers Squibb …The Hyde and Watson F…Curtis W McGraw Found…The Ford FoundationThe Frank J Ryan and …John D and Catherine …Rockefeller Philanthr…The Robert Wood Johns…National Philanthropi…Tides FoundationSipprelle Charitable …
Princeton Area Community Foundation IncNJ26.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Princeton Area Community Foundation Inc · Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation Inc · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Curtis W McGraw Foundation · The Ford Foundation · The Frank J Ryan and Jane E Ryan Family Foundation · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Tides Foundation · Sipprelle Charitable Corp

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The IV Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
  • Isles Inc — 21% of income from government
  • Freedom Reads Inc — 12% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
  • Homefront Inc — 9% of income from government
  • The Watershed Institute Inc — 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 86 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines