· Private foundation
Iowa Foundation for Education Environment and the Arts
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $38k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CIVIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION | $75,000 |
| 1000 FRIENDS OF IOWA | $18,232 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD NORTH CENTRAL | $10,000 |
| B'NAI HORIN CHILDREN OF FREEDOM | $10,000 |
| IRONDALE ENSEMBLE PROJECT | $6,000 |
| NEW JERSEY SCHOLAR PROGRAM | $5,000 |
| GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP | $2,500 |
| AMAS COMMUNITY THEATRE | $1,000 |
| PRATT INSTITUTE | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
28 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CMCIVIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION DES MOINES8× · 2017–2024 · $666k · revenue +242%
- 1F1000 FRIENDS OF IOWA8× · 2017–2024 · $149k · revenue +118% · 29% of their budget
- IPIrondale Productions Inc7× · 2017–2023 · $48k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- IAINTERFAITH ALLIANCE OF IOWAgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +155%
- NENEW ENGLAND STATISTICAL SOCIETY INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +179%
- CCCITIZENSHIP COUNTSone grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -69%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote social, economic and environmental justice.
Common good iowa engages iowans to create and advocate for research-based public policy that makes life better and more equitable for all who make iowa home.
The mission of Iowa Policy Project is to promote public policy that fosters economic opportunity while safeguarding the health and well-being of Iowa's people and the environment. By providing a foundation of fact-based, objective research…
To promote the common business interests of member companies without profit and without the inuring of income to the benefit of any member company or individual. to present the executive, legislative, judicial and regulatory bodies…
Iowa sister states is dedicated to connecting iowans with the world community. our mission is to develop and implement international partnerships and programs that promote the cultural, economic, and other interests of iowa and its friends…
The independent insurance agents of iowa will be an unrelenting advocate of the business, professional and political interests of its members; doing so by working in the public's interest and with the highest ethical standards.
Our mission is to inspire the iowa city area to be greater by: 1) elevating business, 2) investing in strategic initiatives, and 3) advocating for the economic resiliency of the greater community.
Exploring, explaining and celebrating the world of plants.
To build and support diverse communities of writers and audiences through the transformative power of story. We lead by inclusion and collaboration, celebrating the emotions, discovery and connections inspired by the written word in all…
To nurture a favorable business, economic, governmental, and social climate within the state of iowa so our citizens can have the opportunity to enjoy the highest possible quality of life.
The iowa corn promotion board (icpb) works to develop and defend markets, fund research, and provide education about corn and corn products. icpb's mission is to create opportunities for long term iowa corn grower profitability.
The organization's mission is to address the immediate needs of sick, injured, and orphaned wild birds, with the goal to return them to the wild and help educate and bring awareness to the global issue that birds are dissappearing at an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Iowa Legal Aid and the most unlike its peers is Citizenship Counts. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 5% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CIVIC MUSIC ASSOCIATION DES MOINES ↗
- Who funds 1000 FRIENDS OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE HEARTLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Irondale Productions Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY SCHOLARS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds MONTGOMERY COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LAW AND POLICY CENTER OF THE MIDWEST ↗
- Who funds WHITEROCK CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES AREA RELIGIOUS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds IOWA INTERFAITH POWER AND LIGHT IOWA FAITH AND CLIMATE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds MIND AND SPIRIT COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds IOWA ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds IOWA JEWISH SENIOR LIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Iowa Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds STAGEWEST THEATER COMPANY ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds GINGOLD THEATRICAL GROUP ↗
- Who funds GATEWAY DANCE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH EMERGENCY SERVICES & SHELTER OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DES MOINES ↗
- Who funds IOWA RIVERS REVIVAL ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH ALLIANCE OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds IOWA NATURAL HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND STATISTICAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds PRATT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds ELLIPSIS INC ↗
- Who funds The Bronx Museum of the Arts ↗
- Who funds WOMEN FOOD & AGRICULTURE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds CITIZENSHIP COUNTS ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF IOWA ↗
- Who funds DES MOINES FOUNDERS GARDEN CLUB ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL IOWA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL DISASTER SEARCH DOG FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cole-Belin Education Foundation · Community Fdn of Greater Des Moines F/K/A Greater Des Moines Community Fdn · Prairie Meadows Race Track and Casino Inc · Bookey Family Foundation · Helen J and Thomas Nelson Urban Sr Charitable Foundation III · Bravo Greater Des Moines Inc · The West Bancorporation Foundation Inc · United Way of Central Iowa · Gartner Family Foundation % Michael G Gartner · Kyle J & Sharon Krause Family Foundation · Golf Charitable Foundation of Greater Des Moines · EMC Insurance Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Iowa Foundation for Education Environment and the Arts funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Iowa Foundation for Education Environment and the Arts?
Find your warmest path to Iowa Foundation for Education Environment and the Arts through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.