Skip to content

· Public charity

The International Rhino Foundation

THE INTERNATIONAL RHINO FOUNDATION (irf) ensures the survival of rhinos through strategic partnerships, targeted protection, and scientifically sound interventions.

$2.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Animals$338kArts & Culture$53kFood & Nutrition$31kEducation$5k
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 1 grants below total $45,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $2,243,430 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $2,198,430 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$45,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK$45,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $25k → 6%WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION: $19k → 9%STANFORD UNIVERSITY: $5k → 8%WILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK: $45k → 10%CONSERVATION CENTERS FOR SPECIES SURVIVAL: $8k → 10%SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE: $35k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $17k → 13%THE NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $4k → 14%WILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS: $100k → 12%CONSERVATION CENTERS FOR SPECIES SURVIVAL: $7k → 10%SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK: $34k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $14k → 13%THE NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $1k → 14%SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK: $20k → 14%SMITHSONIAN CONSERVATION BIOLOGY INSTITUTE NATIONAL ZOOLOGICAL PARK: $19k → 14%FRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US: $23k → 14%FRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US: $17k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
MN
CA
CO
NC
DC
TX
FL

Grants abroad, by region: $2.2M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

China (Including Hong Kong), East Timor, Fiji, Indonesia, Japan, Kiribati,$1.2M · 55% · 4 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR RHINO PROTECTION IN INDONEISA · SUPPORT FOR RHINO AND WILDLIFE PROTECTION IN LEUSER ECOSYSTEM, INDONESIA · SUPPORT FOR RHINO HABITAT MANAGEMENT IN WAY KAMBAS NATIONAL PARK, INDONESIA

Sub-Saharan Africa$641k · 29% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE AND LOGISTICS FOR WILDLIFE MONITORING · SUPPORT FOR RHINO REWILD TRANSLOCATIONS · MOUNTAINLANDS NATURE RESERVE (MNR) EXPANSION & PASSTHROUGH

South Asia$136k · 6% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT RHINO CONSERVATION IN NORTHERN INDIA · SUPPORT FOR RHINO HABITAT RESTORATION IN CHITWAN

Swaziland, Tanzania, Togo, Uganda, Zambia, And Zimbabwe$89k · 4% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR LOWVELD RHINO TRUST OPERATIONS IN ZIMBABWE, RHINO MONITORING, PROTECTION, POPULATION MANAGEMENT · SUPPORT FOR WILDLIFE CRIME PREVENTION IN, AND TRAFFICING OUT, OF AFRICA

Turkey, And The United Kingdom (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland,$62k · 3% · 2 grants

Stated purpose: INTELLIGENCE & INFORMANT SUPPORT · PASS-THROUGH SUPPORT FOR LOWVELD RHINO TRUST INFORMANT SYSTEM

Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome & Principe,$55k · 3% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR RHINO CONSERVATION IN NAMIBIA & PASSTHROUGH

Luxemborg, Monaco, Montenegro, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,$10k · 0% · 1 grant

Stated purpose: SUPPORT FOR RHINO RESOURCE CENTER MANAGEMENT AND OPERATIONS

How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

47%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$197k · 5 repeat orgs$224k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
4

Total granted

$197k
$179k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
-4%

Still filing today

80%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    4× · 2018–2024 · $108k · revenue +30%
  • FZ
    FRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $40k · revenue +76%
  • NORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $5k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • WP
    WILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue -53%
  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES
    one grant, 2023 · $35k · revenue -4%
  • MZ
    MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue +131%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Wildlife Society

The wildlife society's mission is to inspire, empower, and enable wildlife professionals to sustain wildlife populations and habitats through science-based management and conservation.

Animals
2
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
3
Conservation Society of California

Through management of oakland zoo, the conservation society of california deepens connection with animals, saves wildlife, and inspires champions for the natural world.

Animals
4
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
5
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
6
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
7
Sri Lanka Wild Life Conservation Society

The Sri Lanka Wild Life Conservation Society was set-up to help protect and conserve the diminishing of Sri Lanka and to make the local and international community aware of it's endangered status. It is dedicated to the conservation and…

Environment
8
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
9
Lincoln Park Zoological Society

Lincoln park zoo is dedicated to connecting people with nature by providing a free, family-oriented wildlife experience in the heart of chicago and by advancing the highest quality of animal care, horticulture, education, science and…

Animals
10
Int'l Union for Conservation of Nature & Natural Resources - Us

Iucn-us fund builds bridges between us donors and iucn by catalyzing, accelerating, funding and promoting iucn's work - conserving nature and natural resources in the united states and throughout the world.

Environment
11
Waterbird Society

The waterbird society is composed of biologists, researchers, conservationists, students, and others interested in the behavior, ecology, and conservation of waterbirds. the organization is administered by officers and council members…

—
12
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Carolina Zoological Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Smithsonian Institution. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
5/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

WILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS: $99,985 · AnimalsWILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONSWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $45,000 · AnimalsWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INCFRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INC: $40,000 · AnimalsFRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INCMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $25,389 · AnimalsMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATIONCONSERVATION CENTERS FOR SPECIES SURVIVAL: $14,250 · AnimalsCONSERVATION CENTERS FOR SPECIES SURVIVAL+1 more: $4,620 · AnimalsSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $107,637 · Arts & CultureSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTIONFRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES: $34,904 · Arts & CultureFRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NAT…UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA: $30,726 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF…WORKING DOGS FOR CONSERVATION: $19,110 · OtherWORKING DOGS …THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,845 · Education
Animals$229,244Arts & Culture$142,541Other$49,836Education$4,845

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION: $107,637 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWILDLIFE PROTECTION SOLUTIONS: $99,985 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWILDLIFE CONSERVATION NETWORK INC: $45,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRANKFURT ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY - US INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE NC STATE MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES: $34,904 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION: $25,389 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONSERVATION CENTERS FOR SPECIES SURVIVAL: $14,250 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $4,845 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY INC: $4,620 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The International Rhino Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The International Rhino Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on International Rhino’s filings →

    More from the funding graph