Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Institute for Spiritual Research Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2024still arriving
22
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Human Services$74kReligion$60kAnimals$52kHealth$46kFood & Nutrition$15kCivil Rights$13kHousing & Shelter$9kInternational$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k20 grants · $75k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$5,000
Median grant
10
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Salavtion Army$10,000
Mother Teresa Center$10,000
Shriners Hospital$8,000
Marine Mammal Center$5,000
St Marys Food Bank$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Phoenix Rescue Mission$5,000
West Wing School Band Program$5,000
St Jude Childrens Hospital$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
Ronald McDonald House Charities$5,000
Humane Society USA$5,000
Make a Wish$3,000
Habitat for Humanity$3,000
Special Olympics$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–21, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OLD TOWN MISSION: $1k → 14%OLD TOWN MISSION: $200 → 14%RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $7k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
NY
MA
SD
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
MD
AZ
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$202k · 22 repeat orgs$121k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

22 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
31

Total granted

$202k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+26%

Still filing today

32%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
AnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEnvironmentRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PG
    PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION
    5× · 2019–2024 · $16k · revenue +69%
  • GG
    GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD
    2× · 2021–2022 · $12k · revenue +51%
  • SM
    ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE
    5× · 2019–2024 · $11k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • RM
    RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONAgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $7k · revenue +26%
  • S
    SPCA
    one grant, 2022 · $7k
  • Save The Children Federation Inc
    one grant, 2022 · $5k · revenue -13%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Michigan Humane Society

To improve and save lives through compassionate care, community engagement and advocacy for animals.

Animals
2
Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals for Monterey County

The SPCA Monterey County's Mission is assuring compassionate treatment of all animals through rescue, rehabilitation, protection and education. The SPCA shelters homeless, neglected, and abused pets, including dogs, cats, horses, exotic…

Animals
3
Santa Barbara Humane Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

Santa barbara humane operates two campuses located in santa barbara and santa maria providing care for community-owned and homeless animals. both campuses offer affordable high quality veterinary care, compassionate behavior training…

Animals
4
Animal Care Sanctuary

Animal care sanctuary's lifesaving mission as a no kill organization envisions a community that promotes turning compassion into action for companion animals by: 1.) adopting healthy pet companions into loving homes. 2.) promoting the…

Animals
5
Animal Outlook Inc

Animal outlook is a national animal protection organization working to end the abuse of farmed animals using a variety of strategies, including investigations, legal advocacy, corporate and food system reform, and vegan outreach.

Animals
6
Arizona Humane Society

We save the most vulnerable animals and enrich the lives of pets and people.

Animals
7
Marin Humane Society

Marin humane transforms lives through exceptional animal care, humane education, and advocacy. every day, marin humane inspires compassion and positive relationships between people and animals.

Animals
8
Spca of Texas

The spca of texas is dedicated to providing every animal exceptional care and a loving home.

Animals
9
Friends for Animals of Metro Detroit

The friends are dedicated to the rescue, protection, and adoption of companion animals in need while inspiring the human-animal bond. we meet our mission by:-saving 100% of healthy and treatable animals.-providing high-quality animal care…

Animals
10
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
11
Humane Society of Yuma

To reduce the number of homeless pets through adoption, rescue and spay and neuter programs.

Animals
12
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Rim Country Hospice Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 67 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/31
Grantees still filing
23/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MOTHER TERSSA CENTER: $31,300 · OtherMOTHER TERSSA CENTERSt Andrew's Episcopal Church: $22,000 · OtherSt Andrew's Episcopal ChurchSALVATION ARMY: $21,200 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSHRINERS HOSPITAL: $14,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALST JUDE'S CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $11,700 · OtherTHE HUMAN SOCIETY: $10,000 · OtherMother Teresa Center: $10,000 · OtherSalavtion Army: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $9,050 · Other+36 more: $88,725 · Other+36 moreGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $12,000 · AnimalsGENTLE GI…THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $6,000 · AnimalsTHE MARIN…BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $4,000 · AnimalsBEST FRIE…Alley Cat Allies Inc: $2,000 · AnimalsAlley Cat…CHIMP HAVEN INC: $2,000 · AnimalsCHIMP HAV…LITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC: $1,000 · AnimalsPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,000 · Animals+2 more: $600 · AnimalsPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $15,902 · ReligionSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $8,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 · HealthPhoenix Children's Hospital: $1,000 · Health+1 more: $200 · HealthST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $11,400 · Food & NutritionRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $7,000 · Human ServicesOld Town Mission Inc: $1,300 · Human ServicesTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 · InternationalWORLD VISION INC: $1,500 · International
Other$237,975Animals$28,600Religion$15,902Health$14,200Food & Nutrition$11,400Human Services$10,300International$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION: $15,902 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD: $12,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE: $11,400 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA: $7,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRim Country Hospice Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAlley Cat Allies Inc: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHIMP HAVEN INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOld Town Mission Inc: $1,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLITTLE LONGEARS MINI DONKEY RESCUE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDE DOGS FOR THE BLIND INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL PARKS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS ARIZONA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIANS & JEWS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSEDONA CREATIVE LIFE CENTER: $525 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetANIMAL LEGAL DEFENSE FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SEDONA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PHOENIX GOSPEL MISSION ↗
  • Who funds GENTLE GIANTS DRAFT HORSE RESCUE SOCIETY LTD ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF CENTRAL AND NORTHERN ARIZONA ↗
  • Who funds THE MARINE MAMMAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds Rim Country Hospice Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS INC ↗
  • Who funds Alley Cat Allies Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHIMP HAVEN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO5.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Institute for Spiritual Research Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Institute for Spiritual Research Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Institute for Spiritual Research Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Institute for Spiritual Research Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 67 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2024, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Institute for Spiritual Research’s filings →

More from the funding graph