Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Ida & Hugh Kohlmeyer Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
0186% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Arts & Culture$50kHuman Services$4kHealth$2kReligion$1kCivil Rights$520Food & Nutrition$500Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$226k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION$1,000
THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM$1,000
ST JUDE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$500
CONGREGATION TEMPLE SINAI$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%NEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $4k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$39k · 6 repeat orgs$22k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
11

Total granted

$39k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+22%

Still filing today

33%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureCivil RightsHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART
    2× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue -45%
  • TU
    TULANE UNIVERSITY-NEWCOMB ART MUSEUM
    2× · 2019–2020 · $8k
  • TN
    THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • MO
    MUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCEgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +138%
  • NO
    NEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER
    one grant, 2018 · $4k · revenue +22%
  • NA
    NEWCOMB ART MUSEUM AT TULANE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2017 · $3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture
3
New Orleans Public Library Foundation

Support of the city of new orleans library system and city wide literacy efforts through parnter organizations, community organizations and initiatives including fundraising and expending funds to supplement library operations.

Education
4
American Association of Museums

Champion equitable and impactful museums by connecting people, fostering learning and community, and nurturing museum excellence.

Arts & Culture
5
Louisiana Art & Science Museuminc

Louisiana art & science museum seeks to enhance the understanding and appreciation of art and science for general audiences and students by presenting unique, educational and entertaining programming that encourages discovery, inspires…

Arts & Culture
6
National Academy of Design

The mission of the national academy of design is to promote the fine arts in america through exhibition and education.

Education
7
Louisiana State Bar Association

The mission of the louisiana state bar association is to assist its members in the practice of law, assure access to and aid in the administration of justice, assist the supreme court in the regulation of the practice of law, uphold the…

8
The Louisiana Museum Foundation

To provide community, grants, programming, and marketing support for the chronically underfunded state-owned and operated louisiana state museum (lsm) system, including the cabildo, presbytere, new orleans jazz museum at the old u.s. mint,…

9
Louisiana Alliance for Nonprofits

To strengthen, promote, and build the capacity of louisiana's nonprofit sector through education, advocacy, and member services.

Philanthropy
10
St Louis Kaplan Feldman Holocaust Museum

The museum provides exhibition experiences and educational programming that connects visitors to the history and lessons of the holocaust with the goal of combating hatred, promoting understanding, and modeling and inspiring humanitarian…

Arts & Culture
11
New Orleans Pharmacy Museum

To further the interest in the history of pharmacology and promote its further development for the benefit of the general public.

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Endowment Foundation

The jewish endowment foundation of louisiana (jef), chartered in 1967, ensures a secure future and an enduring legacy by serving as an essential resource for jewish and non-jewish philanthropy.

Philanthropy

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Louisiana Endowment for the Humanities and the most unlike its peers is Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART — $25,000 · Arts & CultureNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ARTMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE — $10,000 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE+2 more — $1,180 · Arts & CultureTULANE UNIVERSITY-NEWCOMB ART MUSEUM — $8,250 · OtherTULANE UNIVERSITY-NEWCOMB ART MUSE…NEWCOMB ART MUSEUM AT TULANE UNIVERSITY — $2,700 · OtherNEWCOMB ART MUSEUM AT TULANE UNIVE…THE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUM — $2,000 · OtherTHE NATIONAL WWII MUSEUMIndividual grant recipient — $1,750 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTULANE UNIVERSITY-NEWCOMB MUSEUM OF ART FUND — $1,000 · OtherTULANE UNIVERSITY-NEWCOMB MUSEUM O…TEMPLE SINAI — $980 · Other+5 more — $2,050 · Other+5 moreNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $4,000 · Human ServicesCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 · HealthANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $520 · Civil RightsSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $500 · Food & Nutrition
Arts & Culture$36,180Other$18,730Human Services$4,000Health$1,000Civil Rights$520Food & Nutrition$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEW ORLEANS MUSEUM OF ART — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE SOUTHERN JEWISH EXPERIENCE — $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNEW ORLEANS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOGDEN MUSEUM OF SOUTHERN ART — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $520 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK GREATER NEW ORLEANS AND ACADIANA — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOUISIANA ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES — $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Goldring Family FoundationLA17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Goldring Family Foundation · Luther and Zita Templeman Foundation · Woldenberg Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Ida & Hugh Kohlmeyer Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph