· Public charity
The Hunter College Foundation Inc
The mission of the hunter college foundation is to enhance hunter college's position as a premiere public educational institution.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 4 grants below total $15,054,220 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $16,887,459 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $1,833,239 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CITY UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION FUND | $7,303,663 |
| CUNY CENTRAL OFFICE- OFFICE OF UNIVERSITY CONTROLLER | $4,004,857 |
| HUNTER COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK | $3,030,553 |
| RESEARCH FOUNDATION OF CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK | $715,147 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $171k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 29% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
6 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHUNTER COLLEGE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK9× · 2017–2025 · $40M
- CUCITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK9× · 2017–2025 · $38M
- CUCITY UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION FUND5× · 2019–2025 · $18M · revenue -10%
Funded once
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INCone grant, 2023 · $121k · revenue +18%
MIXTECA ORGANIZATION INCone grant, 2024 · $20k · revenue -14%- BABLOOMINGDALE AGING IN PLACEone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +2% · 29% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
To provide long term residential healthcare, short term rehab, assisted living, and alzheimer's care for older adults.
Mission: to heal, to teach, to discover and to advance the health of the communities we serve. values: humanity, innovation, teamwork, diversity and equity - our values define our philosophy of care. they shape our actions and motivate and…
Our mission is to empower older adults to enhance purpose and well-being through a portfolio of innovative health care services.
Jewish home of central new york senior apartment's mission is to assure maximum independence and dignity offering a broad range of the highest quality of health, residential and community services. jewish home of central new york senior…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The board adopted mission statement is: nyu langone hospitals (the "hospital") will operate with new york university's medical schools a health system ("nyu langone health") devoted to excellence in patient care, education and research. in…
Jewish home lifecare, university avenue assisted living, inc (d/b/a the new jewish home, university avenue assisted living) ("university avenue assisted living"), was formed for the purpose of operating a medicaid assisted living facility…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Community based wellness program to promote wellness for the reduction of chronic illness in east new york
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Children's Village Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bloomingdale Aging in Place. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CITY UNIVERSITY CONSTRUCTION FUND ↗
- Who funds HCF RENOVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York ↗
- Who funds HUNTER HILLEL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds MIXTECA ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOMINGDALE AGING IN PLACE ↗
- Who funds VISIONSSERVICES FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
- Who funds MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER ↗
- Who funds SERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH HOME LIFECARE MANHATTAN ↗
- Who funds MARY MITCHELL FAMILY AND YOUTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH ACTION OF STATEN ISLAND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hunter College Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.