Skip to content
The Hubert Charitable Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Hubert Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Animals$454kEducation$144kMembership Benefit$30kPhilanthropy$17kScience & Tech$15kYouth Development$12k
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NONE$20,000
NONE$12,700
NONE$12,700
NONE$12,700
NONE$12,000
NONE$10,000
NONE$10,000
NONE$2,500
NONE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $20k → 22%Fur and Tails Animal Rescue: $10k → 11%BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION: $10k → 20%LSU FOUNDATION - VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY RESEARCH FUND: $41k → 19%NONE: $13k → 8%NONE: $13k → 10%NONE: $13k → 15%NONE: $12k → 15%NONE: $3k → 21%Gulf Coast Humane Society: $20k → 11%Beckley Area FDN: $7k → 20%LSU FOUNDATION - VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY RESEARCH FUND: $23k → 19%EAA Chapter 1522 Inc: $13k → 15%EAA Chapter 1227 Inc: $3k → 21%Gulf Coast Humane Society: $10k → 11%BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION - RODNEY F MOODY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $2k → 20%LSU FOUNDATION - VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY RESEARCH FUND: $18k → 19%Helping Hounds Find Homes Inc: $9k → 15%CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE: $11k → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $30k → 19%NONE: $3k → 15%CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WI: $10k → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WI: $4k → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $18k → 19%CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WI: $765 → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $18k → 19%EAA CHAPTER 66: $30k → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $18k → 19%Animal Refuge Center: $30k → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $7k → 19%ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER: $30k → 11%LSU FOUNDATION: $4k → 19%ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER: $24k → 11%ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER: $20k → 11%ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 11%ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 11%NONE: $10k → 11%Animal Refuge Center: $10k → 11%ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER: $10k → 11%FORTUNATE FERALS: $10k → 11%Fortunate Ferals: $10k → 11%Fortunate Ferals: $10k → 11%NONE: $20k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

72%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$472k · 7 repeat orgs$184k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +98% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
8

Total granted

$472k
$89k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+98%
0%

Still filing today

71%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AR
    ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $144k · revenue +80%
  • LF
    LSU FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $120k · revenue +98%
  • HO
    HAVEN ON EARTH ANIMAL LEAGUE INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $40k · revenue +866% · 33% of their budget

Funded once

  • EC
    EAA CHAPTER 66
    one grant, 2022 · $30k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE
    one grant, 2017 · $20k
  • EC
    EAA CHAPTER 1522 INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2024 · $13k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fur Ever Home Cat Sanctuary

Provide loving care & home for approx 120 Feral Cats that are in danger out in streets/unadoptable. TNR projects for feral cat colonies around Horry County. Provide Vet & medication care for animals in-house.

Animals
2
Fur Animal Rescue

Animal rescue organization dedicated to finding homes for animals at the animal shelter. we also provde vet care foster homes, and assistance with homing for special needs animals.

Animals
3
Angies Dog House

We are dedicated to rescuig animals left homeless for whatever reason, animals in public shelters where they are at high risk of euthanasia, animals given up by their owners because of difficult circumstances, and those in danger of abuse…

Animals
4
South Florida Beagle Rescue Inc

beagle rescue

Animals
5
Dollys Legacy Animal Rescue

Foster-based animal rescue that rescues homeless and abandoned animals, providing them with veterinary care including specialized care, heartworm treatment, surgery, severe illness treatment & hospitalization, then placing them for…

Animals
6
Animal Rescue and Adoption Agency Inc

An animal rescue/adoption Agency. Rescued animals are from kill shelters or owner surrenders facing hardship then rehabbed/medical completed while in foster care then adopted into loving homes.

Animals
7
Saving Paws Rescue of Florida Inc

To assist in the medical care, misc care and rehoming of animals that do not have a home

Animals
8
Hart

Animal shelter and rescue

Animals
9
Hope Fur Paws Rescue

To help injured, abandoned and unwanted animals. We provide food, vet care that includes heartworm prevention and spay or neuter services, shelter and anything else needed.

Animals
10
Tampa Bay Strays Inc

Animal rescue and adoption facilitator to permanent homes.

Animals
11
Tennessee River Rescues

we exist to spay and neuter unwanted pets in our local area trying to find them a home to thrive in until the end of their time

Animals
12
Cat Tail Farms Feline Sanctuary

Animal rescue and housing

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gulf Coast Humane Society Inc; the most unlike its peers is Eaa Chapter 1227. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NONE: $95,100 · OtherNONELSU FOUNDATION - VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY RESEARCH FUND: $82,064 · OtherLSU FOUNDATION - VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY RESEA…EAA CHAPTER 66: $30,000 · OtherEAA CHAPTER 66FORTUNATE FERALS INC: $30,000 · OtherFORTUNATE FERALS INCUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE: $20,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF VETERINAR…EAA CHAPTER 1522 INCORPORATED: $12,500 · Other+2 more: $4,876 · OtherANIMAL REFUGE CENTER INC: $144,246 · AnimalsANIMAL REFUGE CENTER INCHAVEN ON EARTH ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $40,000 · AnimalsHAVEN ON EARTH ANIMAL LEAGUE INCGULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $30,000 · AnimalsGULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INCCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $25,690 · AnimalsCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE I…Fur and Tails Animal Rescue Inc: $10,000 · AnimalsHELPING HOUNDS FIND HOMESINC: $9,000 · AnimalsLSU FOUNDATION: $119,512 · EducationLSU FOUNDATION+1 more: $2,500 · EducationBECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC: $16,550 · Philanthropy
Other$274,540Animals$258,936Education$122,012Philanthropy$16,550

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetANIMAL REFUGE CENTER INC: $144,246 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $119,512 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHAVEN ON EARTH ANIMAL LEAGUE INC: $40,000 over 3y, 33% of budgetGULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC: $25,690 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetBECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC: $16,550 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFur and Tails Animal Rescue Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetHELPING HOUNDS FIND HOMESINC: $9,000 over 1y, 21% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANIMAL REFUGE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HAVEN ON EARTH ANIMAL LEAGUE INC ↗
  • Who funds GULF COAST HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds CLINIC FOR THE REHABILITATION OF WILDLIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds BECKLEY AREA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Fur and Tails Animal Rescue Inc ↗
  • Who funds HELPING HOUNDS FIND HOMESINC ↗
  • Who funds EAA CHAPTER 1227 ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giv…National Philanthropi…American Online Givin…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC9.3× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hubert Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hubert Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    5get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hubert’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home