Skip to content
The Huber Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Huber Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2022 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.5M
Granted FY2022
2
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$2.5M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2022.

Philanthropy$2.5MArts & Culture$124kEducation$45kFood & Nutrition$21kRecreation & Sports$18kHealth$17kEnvironment$8kScience & Tech$8kOther$0
02FY2022 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $250k+1 grant · $2.5M
$2,481,710
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RICHARD L HUBER CHARITABLE FUND$2,481,710
INSTITUTE OF FINE ARTS - NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$8,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–21, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
IL
NY
MA
PA
CA
KY
VA
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

7%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$198k · 20 repeat orgs$2.5M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 19 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
9

Total granted

$198k
$37k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+14%

Still filing today

75%
78%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementInternationalHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MM
    METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART
    2× · 2020–2021 · $21k · revenue +119%
  • NY
    New York University
    2× · 2020–2021 · $15k · revenue +45%
  • VO
    VOICES OF ASCENSION INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $14k · revenue +100%

Funded once

  • FA
    FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +10%
  • CO
    Camp O-AT-KA Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -45%
  • Northwestern University
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +14%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
2
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
3
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
4
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
5
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
6
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
7
San Francisco Museum of Modern Art

See schedule osfmoma believes the art of our time is vital and shares it with passion and purpose, and that art and the creative process can open minds and help build a better world. for that reason, we assemble unparalleled collections,…

Arts & Culture
8
Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden Inc

We harness the power of plants for humankind and share the joy and beauty of tropical gardening with everyone. fairchild tropical botanic garden is a museum of tropical plants within a world famous, 83-acre designed landscape. it was…

Environment
9
National September 11 Memorial and Museum At the World Trade Center

The national september 11 memorial & museum at the world trade center bears solemn witness to the terrorist attacks of september 11, 2001, and february 26, 1993. located at a site made sacred through loss, the memorial & museum remembers…

Arts & Culture
10
New York Hall of Science

Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…

Arts & Culture
11
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
12
The Newark Museum Association

Nmoa mission statement is: we welcome everyone with inclusive experiences that spark curiosity and foster community.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Frick Collection; the most unlike its peers is Ivory Education Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
17/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RICHARD L HUBER CHARITABLE FUND: $2,481,710 · OtherRICHARD L HUBER CHARITABLE FUND+14 more: $94,950 · OtherHISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $30,000 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $21,000 · Arts & CultureVOICES OF ASCENSION INC: $14,000 · Arts & CultureNew York Historical Society: $12,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $3,300 · Arts & CultureNew York University: $15,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,500 · EducationPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,500 · Education+1 more: $1,000 · EducationCamp O-AT-KA Inc: $10,000 · Recreation & SportsNorthwestern University: $7,500 · Recreation & SportsFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $11,000 · Community ImprovementFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $5,000 · Environment
Other$2,576,660Arts & Culture$80,300Education$31,000Recreation & Sports$17,500Community Improvement$11,000Food & Nutrition$10,000Environment$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10k$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHISPANIC SOCIETY OF AMERICA: $30,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $26,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $21,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNew York University: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVOICES OF ASCENSION INC: $14,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetNew York Historical Society: $12,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY: $11,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp O-AT-KA Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FREE CLINIC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNorthwestern University: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetACCION INTERNATIONAL: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRADY CENTER TO PREVENT GUN VIOLENCE: $2,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC: $1,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIVORY EDUCATION INSTITUTE: $1,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetWNET: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY DOCUMENTARY PHOTOGRAPHIC PROJECT INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
National Philanthropic TrustPA8.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Huber Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Huber Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 7%
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Huber Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home