· Private foundation
The Diomedes Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $15k
- $10k–50k10 grants · $157k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $275k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOYNTON FMAILY FUND - FIDELITY CHARITABLE | $1,517,986 |
| HARVARD UNIVERSITY | $292,000 |
| EMERSON HEALTH | $130,350 |
| MIDDLESEX SCHOOL | $95,000 |
| RENAISSANCE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC - THEODORA PARK FUND | $50,000 |
| CONCORD CARLISLE FOUNDATION | $26,100 |
| ISLAND HOUSING TRUST | $25,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $22,500 |
| MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOCIATION | $15,000 |
| THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER | $15,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF HAMILTON COLLEGE | $13,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| UBUNTU GLOBAL CONNECTIONS | $10,000 |
| ST PAUL'S SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against +56% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY CORPORATION5× · 2017–2025 · $381k · revenue +48%
- ACAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES2× · 2017–2018 · $312k · revenue +141%
MIDDLESEX SCHOOL6× · 2019–2025 · $232k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- EHEMERSON HEALTH FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $115k
- HCHARVARD COLLEGE FUNDone grant, 2023 · $100k
- TPTHEODORA PARK FOUNDATION CO CARLOS BYRNE BNY MELLON CHARITABLE GIFT FUNDone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
To preserve the unique character and natural resources of harvard.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Paul's School and the most unlike its peers is Save Our Heritage Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds CONCORD FREE PUBLIC LIBRARY CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
- Who funds MIDDLESEX SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds EMERSON HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds HARVARD VARSITY CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST HARBOR SAILING SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCORD ANTIQUARIAN SOCIETY D/B/A CONCORD MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Hamilton College ↗
- Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST ↗
- Who funds The Childrens Room Center for Grieving Children ↗
- Who funds Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds CONCORD CARLISLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CONCORD250 CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Womens Sports Foundation ↗
- Who funds USA HOCKEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL'S SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds STEPPINGSTONE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC ↗
- Who funds HOUSEHOLD GOODS INC ↗
- Who funds UBUNTU GLOBAL CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN PROMISE EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE CARNEGIE INITIATIVE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Neil & Anna Rasmussen Foundation · The Howard Johnson Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Baker Root Family Foundation Inc · Zachary and Lindsey Gund Foundation · The Boger Charitable Trust · Kane Wallace Foundation · E Newbold & Margaret Dupont Smith F Foundation (Dba Thornedge Fdn) · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Colket Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Diomedes Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- Communities for Restorative Justice Inc — 8% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- The Sports Museum of New England Inc — 5% of income from government
- Emerson Hospital — 3% of income from government
- Island Housing Trust Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Emerson Umbrella Inc — 1% of income from government
- Concord Antiquarian Society D/B/a Concord Museum — 1% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Diomedes Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Diomedes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.