How much does THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim give?

THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim reported 2 grants totaling $7,943 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 44 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2024.

What does THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are International (52%), Religion (24%), Human Services (15%).

Who are THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: American Friends of Yad Eliezer ($232k), Congregation Shomrei Emunah Inc ($53k), One Israel Fund Ltd ($34k).

Does THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 70% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

Which funders back the same organizations as THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore, The Ojc Fund, The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn.

Where is THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim based?

THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim is based in MD.

THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim

THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim at a glance

· Private foundation

THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$8k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$5k

Largest

01What it funds

01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$266kReligion$120kHuman Services$75kFood & Nutrition$26kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kHealth$7kPhilanthropy$4kYouth Development$2kOther$0

02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$5,443

Median grant

States reached

$585

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
Congregation Shomrei Emunah -BYTF	$5,443
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER - B	$2,500

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $237k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$403k · 20 repeat orgs$105k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +96% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$403k

$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+96%

Still filing today

40%

32%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyReligionEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

AF
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD ELIEZER
3× · 2019–2025 · $232k · revenue +2%
RC
RABBI CHAIM KOWALSKY MEMORIAL AHAVAS YISRAEL FUND INC
2× · 2019–2024 · $24k · revenue +54%
LH
LENOX HILL BIKUR CHOLIM INC
3× · 2017–2024 · $4k · revenue +377%

Funded once

OI
ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
one grant, 2024 · $34k · revenue 0%
IG
Individual grant recipient
one grant, 2024 · $34k
YG
YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON MOSEH
one grant, 2024 · $4k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel

Philanthropy

Zichron Avrohom Yosef

Philanthropy

Noam Shabbos Inc

To provide financial and other assistance to needy persons and families in Israel

Religion

Friends of Bikur Cholim Ezrat Achim

To support the charitable activities of the organization ezrat achim in the city of beit shemesh, israel.

International

American Friends of Birkat Haaretz Inc

The purpose of Birkat Haaretz is to promote the laws of shmitta accordance to Jewish law.

Religion

Zichron Tzvi Elimelech

Assists thousands of needy individuals, families and multiplecharities in Israel and North America.

—

Ohr Meir Ubracha

The organization provides financial assistance to victims of acts of terrorism in the state of israel.

Philanthropy

The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation

—

Tzidkas Binyomin Inc

Tzidkas Binyamin is organized for charitable, religious and educational purposes, to assist Jewish orthodox institutions and needy individuals in need of financial aid.

Philanthropy

Gemilas Chesed Kramer Inc

Philanthropy

Chasdei Dovid Elimelech Inc

Philanthropy

Yeshivas Nachlas Bnei Shimon

To provide financial assistance to jewish educational and charitable causes.

International

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Menucha Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

19/19

Grantees still filing

8/19

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Human Services$236,750Other$215,393International$38,000Philanthropy$6,600Religion$5,970Public Safety & Disaster$3,650Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Associated Jewish Charities of BaltimoreMD27.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · The Ojc Fund · The Nathan and Marilyn Silberman Fdn · Gutman Family Foundation Inc · The Tzedakah Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Alvin & Rose Berlin Foundation · Khosh Family Foundation Inc · Alice G Hanson Family Foundation · Sheldon & Carol Glusman Foundation Inc · Foundation for the Preservation & Perpetuation of Torah Laws & Customs

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from THE HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

5get no government money at all

4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on HOREINU FOUNDATION co Mendel Vim’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home