Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hope Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$165k
Granted FY2020
9
Grants FY2020
4
States reached
$70k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

53% of The Hope Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Servants Heart Ministry Corporation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2020, the last year The Hope Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 5 organizations, $165k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

8
’17
8
’18
2
’19
5
’20
3
’21
3
’22
2
’23
3
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$710kHealth$658kHuman Services$325kReligion$221kCrime & Legal$40kFood & Nutrition$30kHousing & Shelter$10kOther$0
02FY2020 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPEN DOOR HAITI$70,000
STAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES$20,000
LIGHTHUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER$20,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SERVANTS HEART MINISTRIES$10,000
DOUG HOLLIDAY MINISTRIES$10,000
SHILOH BIBLE CAMP$10,000
PRISON FELLOWSHIP$10,000
RAHAB MINISTRIES$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $355k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 6%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $50k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $75k → 14%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $15k → 7%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $75k → 6%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $50k → 14%CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION: $15k → 7%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $75k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
OH
NJ
VA
TN
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.9M · 12 repeat orgs$254k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +90% since the first grant, against -9% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2020, 9 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call). Read against FY2020, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
11

Total granted

$1.9M
$254k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+90%
-9%

Still filing today

67%
18%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $150k · revenue +134%
  • WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $125k · revenue +90%
  • LP
    LIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC
    3× · 2017–2020 · $60k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • HA
    HOPE AND SERENITY RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC
    one grant, 2021 · $155k · revenue -84% · 66% of their budget
  • SO
    STAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC
    one grant, 2020 · $20k · revenue -9%
  • HA
    HOPE AND SERENITY RECOVERY CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $18k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
2
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
3
Journey to Destiny Ministries

Journey To Destiny Ministries (JTDM) is a global, faith-based nonprofit organization committed to transforming and restoring dignity, hope, and opportunity to vulnerable individualsespecially children, women, and families affected by…

Religion
4
New Heart World Ministries
Religion
5
Heart Bridge International

Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…

Religion
6
God's Light in the Darkness Foundation
Philanthropy
7
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
8
Good Samaritan Mission Inc

To care for the needy, share the good news of jesus christ and change lives by providing counseling, life skill training, dignity gained through work and christ-centered discipleship.

—
9
Purpose Driven Connection Dba Pastor Ricks Daily Hope

Purpose Driven Connection is dedicated to helping create healthy lives and healthy churches for the global glory of God.

Religion
10
H10 Ministries

We seek to touch lives, change hearts, and love people to Christ by helping to provide for their spiritual and physical needs.

Human Services
11
Come to Him Ministries

To help those struggling in a personal crisis find relief and disciple them into a christ-centered lifestyle through a ministry of reconciliation, applying the truth of scripture, working with others and sharing in fellowship with those…

Health
12
World Hope International Inc

The purpose of world hope international, inc. (whi) includes providing assistance to economically disadvantaged people through long-term social transformation projects, including anti-trafficking protection, clean water, economic…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Star of Hope Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Marc Lustgarten Pancreatic Cancer Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
8/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RONALD MC DONALD HOUSE OF SO NJ: $200,000 · OtherRONALD MC DONALD HOUSE OF SO NJMAKE A WISH: $200,000 · OtherMAKE A WISHST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $175,000 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITALHOPE AND SERENITY RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $155,000 · OtherHOPE AND SERENITY RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INCLIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $60,000 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INCINTERATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $40,000 · Other+10 more: $99,000 · Other+10 moreOPEN DOOR HAITI INC: $535,000 · InternationalOPEN DOOR HAITI INCWORLD VISION INC: $25,000 · InternationalMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $200,000 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PA…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $125,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PR…CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $30,000 · Human ServicesCENTER FOR FOOD AC…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $150,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PUR…DOUG HOLLIDAY MINISTRIES INC: $85,000 · ReligionDOUG HOLLIDAY M…SERVANTS HEART MINISTRY CORPORATION: $75,000 · ReligionSERVANTS HEART …WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME: $50,000 · Health
Other$929,000International$560,000Human Services$355,000Religion$310,000Health$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOPEN DOOR HAITI INC: $535,000 over 9y, 29% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $200,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHOPE AND SERENITY RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $155,000 over 1y, 66% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $125,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOUG HOLLIDAY MINISTRIES INC: $85,000 over 9y, 9.0% of budgetSERVANTS HEART MINISTRY CORPORATION: $75,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC: $60,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetWALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME: $50,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY: $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetSHILOH BIBLE CAMP INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OPEN DOOR HAITI INC ↗
  • Who funds MARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE AND SERENITY RECOVERY COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds DOUG HOLLIDAY MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SERVANTS HEART MINISTRY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds LIGHTHOUSE PREGNANCY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR FOOD ACTION IN NEW JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds STAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds SHILOH BIBLE CAMP INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chrinian Family FoundationNJ13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chrinian Family Foundation · Robert a Skead & Mildred L Skead Ch · Columbia Bank Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hope Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hope Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%5%19%42%75%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Servants Heart Ministry Corporation: 0% of income from government
  • Center for Food Action in New Jersey: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hope’s filings →

More from the funding graph