Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hook Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.1M
Granted FY2022
12
Grants FY2022
5
States reached
$310k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Hook Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2022, the last year The Hook Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $1M. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

18
17
7
18
9
19
8
20
9
21
10
22
2
23
2
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$21MPublic Benefit$5.5MCivil Rights$2.0MEducation$1.8MHealth$915kHuman Services$318kReligion$158kArts & Culture$125kOther$0
02FY2022 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2022

  • $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $425k
  • $250k+2 grants · $610k
$25,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$160k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION$310,000
TRUE THE VOTE INC$300,000
BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE$200,000
HILLSDALE COLLEGE$150,000
COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS$75,000
PTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA$25,000
HOUSTONS AMAZING PLACE INC$25,000
TURNING POINT USA INC$10,000
CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH$10,000
BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC$10,000
LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE$10,000
MAIN STREET MINISTRIES HOUSTON$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $335k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $25k → 20%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $25k → 20%Nehemiah Center: $3k → 16%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 20%HOUSTONS AMAZING PLACE INC: $25k → 16%CAL FARLEYS BOYS RANCH: $10k → 20%HOUSTONS AMAZING PLACE INC: $25k → 16%HOUSTONS AMAZING PLACE INC: $25k → 16%HOUSTONS AMAZING PLACE INC: $25k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $50k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $25k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $25k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $10k → 16%BOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC: $10k → 16%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES HOUSTON: $10k → 16%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES HOUSTON: $10k → 16%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES HOUSTON: $10k → 16%MAIN STREET MINISTRIES HOUSTON: $10k → 16%Open Door Mission: $3k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MI
NY
IN
OH
MO
VA
AZ
TN
DC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$9.5M · 12 repeat orgs$625k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2022, 2 since wound down. Read against FY2022, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
27

Total granted

$9.5M
$625k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+33%

Still filing today

92%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationPublic BenefitHousing & ShelterCivil RightsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    TEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +110%
  • TT
    TRUE THE VOTE INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $2.0M · revenue ×14 · 39% of their budget
  • CO
    COLLEGE OF THE OZARKS
    6× · 2017–2022 · $775k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UO
    University of Missouri
    one grant, 2017 · $210k
  • FP
    FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HOUSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $145k
  • ARROWMONT SCHOOL OF ARTS & CRAFTS
    one grant, 2018 · $100k · revenue -30%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Presbyterian School

Family, School, and Church united in the education and support of each child - this is the founding premise upon which Presbyterian School nurtures and challenges its students. The school provides an educational program of the highest…

Education
2
Houston Christian University

The mission of houston christian university is to provide a learning experience that instills in students a passion for academic, spiritual, and professional excellence as a result of our central confession, "jesus christ is lord."

3
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
4
Houston Botanic Garden

To enrich life through discovery, education, and the conservation of plants and the natural environment.

Environment
5
The Woodlands Christian Academy

TWCA is an independent, Christ-centered college preparatory school that integrates learning with biblical faith and challenges our students to reach their highest potential - intellectually, creatively, physically, and socially - for the…

6
Vanderbilt University

See Disclosure Above.

Education
7
Harvey Mudd College

HMC seeks to educate engineers, scientists, and mathematicians well versed in all of these areas and in the humanities, social sciences and the arts so that they may assume leadership in their fields with a clear understanding of the…

Education
8
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
9
Trinity University

Trinity university is an independent co-educational university whose mission is excellence in the interrelated areas of teaching, research and services.

Education
10
South Texas College of Law Houston Inc

South texas college of law houston provides a diverse body of students the opportunity to obtain an exceptional legal education, preparing graduates to serve their community and profession with distinction.

Education
11
St Peter Catholic

St. Peter Catholic High School empowers students to be models of faith through Catholic spiritual formation, while providing a creative and comprehensive education in career and technical pathways.

Education
12
Erskine College and Theological Seminary

Erskine College exists to glorify God as a Christian academic community where students are equipped to flourish as whole persons for lives of service through the pursuit of undergraduate liberal arts and graduate theological education.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyEducation Equity LeadershipHospice Care ServicesIndependent K-8 SchoolsVeteran Support ServicesChild and Family ServicesCommunity Health CentersGovernment Accountability R…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr19%26%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%37%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%1%10–20yr19%73%20–35yr13%19%35–55yr16%8%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/30
the rest of the field
10%
11,858/120,730

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/28
Grantees still filing
23/28
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC — $21,490,423 · PhilanthropyMORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INCTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $5,425,000 · Public BenefitTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY…+4 more — $223,000 · Public BenefitHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $847,500 · EducationCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $775,000 · EducationBaylor College of Medicine — $652,500 · Education+3 more — $12,000 · EducationTRUE THE VOTE INC — $2,025,000 · Civil RightsUniversity of Missouri — $210,000 · OtherFIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH OF HOUSTON — $145,000 · OtherARROWMONT SCHOOL OF ARTS & CRAFTS — $100,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY — $82,500 · OtherBoy Scouts of AmericaSHAC — $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $25,000 · OtherHOUSTON HOSPICE LIFE MATTERS — $25,000 · OtherAMAZING PLACE — $25,000 · Other+12 more — $56,330 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $120,000 · Human ServicesHouston's Amazing Place Inc — $100,000 · Human ServicesCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $70,000 · Human ServicesMain Street Ministries Houston — $40,000 · Human Services+2 more — $5,000 · Human ServicesMain Street Ministries Inc — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $7,500 · Housing & ShelterHouston Museum of Natural Science — $275 · Arts & Culture
Philanthropy$21,490,423Public Benefit$5,648,000Education$2,287,000Civil Rights$2,025,000Other$693,830Human Services$335,000Housing & Shelter$15,000Arts & Culture$275

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTEXAS PUBLIC POLICY FOUNDATION — $5,425,000 over 7y, 10% of budgetTRUE THE VOTE INC — $2,025,000 over 6y, 39% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE — $847,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE OF THE OZARKS — $775,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $652,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPTSD FOUNDATION OF AMERICA — $125,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS COUNTRY OF HOUSTON INC — $120,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetHouston's Amazing Place Inc — $100,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetARROWMONT SCHOOL OF ARTS & CRAFTS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION — $76,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCAL FARLEY'S BOYS RANCH — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMain Street Ministries Houston — $40,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLeadership Institute — $21,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMain Street Ministries Inc — $7,500 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSTAR OF HOPE MISSION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETA THETA PI FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHouston Hospice — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZeta Phi Society Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetOpen Door Mission — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNehemiah Center Inc — $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSt John's School — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHINQUAPIN PREPARATORY SCHOOL — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATO INSTITUTE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEdChoice Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHouston Museum of Natural Science — $275 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Houston Community FoundationTX21.6× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Houston Community Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Strake Foundation · Shell USA Company Foundation · Hildebrand Foundation · The Brown Foundation Inc · Sterling-Turner Foundation · The William Stamps Farish Fund · Marek Family Foundation · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hook Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Hook Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Hook Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph