Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hollyhock Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$36M
Granted FY2024still arriving
53
Grants FY2024still arriving
12
States reached
$16M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$156MEducation$60MArts & Culture$12MEnvironment$6.7MCrime & Legal$3.2MHuman Services$2.7MYouth Development$2.4MCommunity Improvement$1.1MOther$0
02FY2024 · 53 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $10k
  • $10k–50k8 grants · $216k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+25 grants · $33M
$242,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$676M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JP MORGAN CHARITABLE GIVING FUND$15,700,000
UNCOMMON SCHOOLS$3,802,654
PROPUBLICA$1,719,706
ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION$1,500,000
MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY$1,254,528
MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY$1,055,300
RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION$770,394
GRIDLAB$750,000
REEL STORIES TEEN FILMMAKING$750,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$500,000
RECIDIVIZ$500,000
MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK$500,000
CITY LORE$400,000
AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP$400,000
GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES$350,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PROJECT HOPE BOSTON INC: $100k → 16%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $500k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $350k → 17%Good Shepherd Services: $350k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $350k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $350k → 17%GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES: $350k → 17%Good Shepherd Services: $350k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
NJ
CA
CO
AR
TN
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 31% of The Hollyhock Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Hollyhock Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$78M · 42 repeat orgs$11M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +63% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.

42 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
20

Total granted

$78M
$6.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+63%
+26%

Still filing today

76%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • US
    UNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +89%
  • PRO PUBLICA INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $5.4M · revenue +64%
  • RH
    ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
    7× · 2017–2024 · $5.0M · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • H
    HTFHGSE
    one grant, 2017 · $2.5M
  • MULTIPLIER
    one grant, 2023 · $1.5M · revenue -12%
  • BC
    BROOKE CHARTER SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $350k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
4
South Shore Charter School

The mission of south shore charter school is to cultivate students the tenacity, integrity, and curiosity needed to become innovative and socially responsible leaders, ready to face and solve the ever-changing challenges facing our…

Education
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

6
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
7
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
8
Albright College

As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.

Education
9
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
10
Chicago Public Education Fund

The chicago public education fund (the fund) is a nonprofit organization that improves public schools in chicago by investing in the talented educators who lead them.

Education
11
New Classrooms Innovation Partners Inc

To create and inspire better ways to give every student an educational foundation for lifelong success. we imagine a world where every student attends a school that meets them where they are, adapts to the unique ways they learn, and…

Education
12
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Uncommon Schools Inc and the most unlike its peers is Museum of the City of New York. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Local History MuseumsPolicy Research and AdvocacyElementary Literacy TutoringSchool District FoundationsIndependent K-12 SchoolsYouth Sports ProgramsSenior Support ServicesImmigrant Worker Support
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%27%10–20yr16%23%20–35yr13%17%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%9%10–20yr16%79%20–35yr13%5%35–55yr16%3%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%1/60
the rest of the field
13%
240,395/1,819,505

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/59
Grantees still filing
44/59
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $117,396,000 · PhilanthropyDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INCNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $32,175,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+2 more — $5,800,000 · PhilanthropyUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC — $19,241,784 · EducationUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INCTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,919,000 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES…MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY — $3,793,828 · EducationMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVE…ZEARN — $3,355,000 · EducationZEARNTEACHING LAB — $3,244,575 · EducationTEACHING LABRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $2,107,354 · EducationGENERATION TEACH INC — $1,825,000 · Education+20 more — $5,878,213 · Education+20 morePENN GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $4,595,109 · OtherPENN GRAD…STANFORD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $3,026,000 · OtherSTANFORD …HTFHGSE — $2,500,000 · OtherHTFHGSECSGF — $2,000,000 · OtherCSGFRECIDIVIZ — $900,000 · OtherBrooke Charter School Foundation — $700,000 · OtherCHANGE SUMMER INC — $1,296,000 · OtherCHANGE SU…REEL STORIES TEEN FILMMAKING INC — $750,000 · Other+26 more — $4,729,600 · Other+26 morePRO PUBLICA INC — $5,435,306 · Arts & CultureCity Report Inc — $1,989,925 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,300,000 · Arts & CultureMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $585,000 · Arts & CultureJAPAN SOCIETY INC — $475,000 · Arts & CultureAMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP — $400,000 · Arts & CultureCITY LORE INC — $400,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $635,000 · Arts & CultureENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $4,000,000 · EnvironmentMULTIPLIER — $1,500,000 · EnvironmentGridLab Inc — $750,000 · EnvironmentISLANDWOOD — $500,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN RENEWABLE EDUCATION FUND — $250,000 · EnvironmentSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY — $245,000 · EnvironmentGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $2,600,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOPE BOSTON INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesIMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC — $2,065,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$155,371,000Education$45,364,754Other$20,496,709Arts & Culture$11,220,231Environment$7,245,000Human Services$2,700,000Crime & Legal$2,065,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC — $117,396,000 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST — $32,175,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC — $19,241,784 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $5,919,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetPRO PUBLICA INC — $5,435,306 over 6y, 2.7% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $4,000,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY — $3,793,828 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetZEARN — $3,355,000 over 5y, 9.4% of budgetTEACHING LAB — $3,244,575 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetGOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES — $2,600,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetRELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION — $2,107,354 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetIMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC — $2,065,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetCity Report Inc — $1,989,925 over 3y, 19% of budgetGENERATION TEACH INC — $1,825,000 over 7y, 24% of budgetMULTIPLIER — $1,500,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $1,300,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetCHANGE SUMMER INC — $1,296,000 over 7y, 42% of budgetARRAY EDUCATION INC — $1,280,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetImpact Public Schools — $900,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetTHE READING LEAGUE INC — $823,000 over 4y, 9.0% of budgetCHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND — $800,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetREEL STORIES TEEN FILMMAKING INC — $750,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetGridLab Inc — $750,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetResearch Foundation of the City University of New York — $722,168 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA — $585,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetISLANDWOOD — $500,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetJAPAN SOCIETY INC — $475,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWest Contra Costa Public Education Fund — $428,700 over 2y, 5.9% of budgetAMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP — $400,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCITY LORE INC — $400,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetBEAM CENTER INC — $365,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetJAZZ AT LINCOLN CENTER INC — $350,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetLITERACY ACADEMY COLLECTIVE INC — $325,000 over 1y, 23% of budgetURBAN ASSEMBLY CHARTER SCHOOL FOR COMPUTER SCIENCE — $300,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation — $285,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN RENEWABLE EDUCATION FUND — $250,000 over 1y, 26% of budgetTHE MARSHALL PROJECT INC — $250,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ALLIANCE FOR CLEAN ENERGY — $245,000 over 1y, 4.5% of budgetFLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $242,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetASCEND LEARNING INC — $209,500 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE ACADEMY FOR TEACHERS INC — $200,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetWilliams College — $164,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK FOCUS INC — $150,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetACADEMY IN MANAYUNK — $132,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPROJECT HOPE BOSTON INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetBLAINE COUNTY HUNGER COALITION INC — $100,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSUMMIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC
  • Who funds NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST
  • Who funds UNCOMMON SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds PRO PUBLICA INC
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds MOUNT ST JOSEPH UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds ZEARN
  • Who funds TEACHING LAB
  • Who funds GOOD SHEPHERD SERVICES
  • Who funds RELAY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION
  • Who funds IMMIGRANT JUSTICE CORPS INC
  • Who funds City Report Inc
  • Who funds GENERATION TEACH INC
  • Who funds MULTIPLIER
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK
  • Who funds CHANGE SUMMER INC
  • Who funds ARRAY EDUCATION INC
  • Who funds Impact Public Schools
  • Who funds THE READING LEAGUE INC
  • Who funds CHARTER FUND INC D/B/A CHARTER SCHOOL GROWTH FUND
  • Who funds REEL STORIES TEEN FILMMAKING INC
  • Who funds GridLab Inc
  • Who funds Research Foundation of the City University of New York
  • Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA
  • Who funds ISLANDWOOD
  • Who funds JAPAN SOCIETY INC
  • Who funds West Contra Costa Public Education Fund
  • Who funds AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA GROUP
  • Who funds CITY LORE INC
  • Who funds BEAM CENTER INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Robin Hood FoundationNY30.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Robin Hood Foundation · Gates Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Beth and Ravenel Curry Foundation · Carnegie Corporation of New York · New Schools Fund · The Heckscher Foundation for Children · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Charter Fund Inc D/B/A Charter School Growth Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hollyhock Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Generation Teach Inc42% of income from government
  • Project Hope Boston Inc18% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation1% of income from government
  • Zearn0% of income from government
  • Williams College0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hollyhock Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Hollyhock Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph