Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hodges Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
21
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$172kHuman Services$79kEducation$50kRecreation & Sports$35kInternational$24kYouth Development$15kArts & Culture$10kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2024 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $40k
$1,200
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$30,000
MENTORING ALLIANCE$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
JACK BREWER FOUNDATION$3,400
FREEDOM HOUSE$2,200
YOUNG LIFE$2,000
PINE COVE CHRISTIAN CAMP$1,800
SALVATION ARMY$1,500
NOROC$1,500
JOSH MCDOWELL MINISTRY$1,300
PARAMOUNT THEATRE$1,200
NOAH PROJECT$1,000
LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
WIPE DISEASES FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%FREEDOM HOUSE: $3k → 8%FREEDOM HOUSE: $2k → 8%Ben Richey Boys Ranch: $3k → 22%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $200 → 16%BEN RICHEY BOYS RANCH: $200 → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%LOVE AND CARE MINISTRIES: $1k → 16%NOROC: $3k → 16%NOROC: $2k → 16%NOROC: $2k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $900 → 22%NOROC: $2k → 16%NOROC: $2k → 16%NOROC: $2k → 16%NOROC: $2k → 16%MEALS ON WHEELS: $500 → 22%Ben Richey Boys Ranch: $200 → 22%Ben Richey Boys Ranch: $200 → 22%Ben Richey Boys Ranch: $200 → 22%NOROC: $200 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$570k · 27 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
4

Total granted

$570k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+110%

Still filing today

44%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthArts & CultureInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NP
    NOAH PROJECT INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $22k · revenue +23%
  • MA
    MENTORING ALLIANCE
    3× · 2017–2024 · $19k · revenue +287%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $15k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • AH
    ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +110%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • GM
    GRACE MUSEUM INC
    one grant, 2017 · $900 · revenue +5%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Border Missions

We distribute food, clothing, and toiletry items to the poor and needy along the TX-Mexico Border as well as ministering to their spiritual needs through services, health programs, and other humanitarian efforts.

Religion
2
Freedom House Ministryinc

Extending gods love worldwide through hands-on humanitarian methods. feeding, educating,training, and equipping orphans and widows in africa to find self worth, identity and purpose.

Religion
3
Faith Bible Church Atx

The church exists to glorify God and make disciples of Jesus Christ

Religion
4
Refuge of Hope Ministries

Glorify and serve god by providing meals for hungry men, women, and children, emergency shelter and transition to independence for homeless men, and spiritual hope through jesus christ.

Religion
5
Meals On Wheels Ministry Inc

Empowers older and disabled adults to live independentlly in thier own homes by providing nutritious home-delivered meals, safety checks, socialization, and community connection, which result in an enhanced quality of life and purpose as…

Food & Nutrition
6
Liberty Ministries

The ministry exists to serve offenders in prison and ex-offenders in the community by showing god's love, providing practical assistance, and supporting biblical standards of justice.

—
7
The Open Door Christian Center

To provide various ministries including a homeless shelter, an addictions recovery program, and a widows and orphans program in a christian environment.

Human Services
8
Breakfast On Beech Street

Feed the poor and underriviledged persons in abilene, texas

Food & Nutrition
9
Restore Texas Ministries

We take in homeless men and train them in life skills and skilled labor. we provide transportation, housing, and living expenses for the men until they are able to find permanent work and housing.

Education
10
First Baptist Denton Ministry Center

The mission of First Refuge Ministries is to share the Gospel of Jesus Christ by offering essential services to those in need within our community. Our belief is that every person has worth and value since they are created by God. Our goal…

Health
11
House of Mercy

Prison ministry and provide faith based clean and sober housing programs to both men and women.

Religion
12
The Grace Message

The Grace Message exists to share the hope and encouragement found in the New Covenant message of Gods grace by helping people embrace the finished work of Christ, walk in their new identity, and enjoy freedom from lifeless religion.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom House; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
14/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $165,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFellowship of Christian Ath: $153,200 · OtherFellowship of Christian AthIndividual grant recipient: $55,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPine Cove Christian Camp: $34,900 · OtherPine Cove Christian CampNOAH PROJECT INC: $22,200 · Other+15 more: $54,000 · Other+15 moreABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureABILENE H…+1 more: $900 · Arts & CultureMENTORING ALLIANCE: $18,600 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $15,100 · Youth DevelopmentNOROC INC: $12,700 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE: $4,900 · Human ServicesAbilene Boys Ranch Inc: $4,200 · Human ServicesLove & Care Ministries: $2,000 · Human ServicesMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,400 · Human ServicesFREEDOM HOUSE: $15,050 · InternationalWIPEDISEASESFOUNDATION: $7,000 · HealthABILENE OPEN DOOR INC: $4,000 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,700 · ReligionJACK BREWER FOUNDATION: $3,400 · Education
Other$485,000Arts & Culture$50,900Youth Development$33,700Human Services$25,200International$15,050Health$11,000Religion$4,700Education$3,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNOAH PROJECT INC: $22,200 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetMENTORING ALLIANCE: $18,600 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $15,100 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE: $15,050 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNOROC INC: $12,700 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetWIPEDISEASESFOUNDATION: $7,000 over 7y, 23% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE: $4,900 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $4,700 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAbilene Boys Ranch Inc: $4,200 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetABILENE OPEN DOOR INC: $4,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetJACK BREWER FOUNDATION: $3,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLove & Care Ministries: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $1,400 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetGRACE MUSEUM INC: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ABILENE HERITAGE SQUARE INC ↗
  • Who funds NOAH PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds MENTORING ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds NOROC INC ↗
  • Who funds WIPEDISEASESFOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds Abilene Boys Ranch Inc ↗
  • Who funds ABILENE OPEN DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds JACK BREWER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Love & Care Ministries ↗
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS ↗
  • Who funds GRACE MUSEUM INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Barber FoundationTX20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Barber Foundation · Moss Adamson Spalding Charities · Greathouse Foundation · Community Foundation of Abilene · Joe Davis Foundation - Defined · The Massey Family Charitable Trust · Shelton Family Foundation · The Legett Foundation · Dian Graves Owen Foundation · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hodges Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hodges Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hodges’ filings →

    More from the funding graph