Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hilltop Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$390k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$1.1MHealth$696kArts & Culture$626kYouth Development$435kEnvironment$403kEducation$295kHousing & Shelter$275kFood & Nutrition$245kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k17 grants · $290k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $100k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
READYKIDS$50,000
SALVATION ARMY$50,000
BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK$30,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC$25,000
COMPUTERS4KIDS$25,000
PARAMOUNT THEATER$25,000
WOMEN'S INITIATIVE$25,000
SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER$20,000
APPALACHIAN VOICES$20,000
CHARLOTTESVILLE CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE$15,000
VIRGINIA DISCOVERY MUSEUM$15,000
PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION$15,000
WILDROCK$15,000
VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM$10,000
WORKSOURCE ENTERPRISES$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $540k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%READYKIDS: $150k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $50k → 8%READYKIDS: $45k → 8%READYKIDS: $45k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$4.4M · 27 repeat orgs$170k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
3

Total granted

$4.4M
$170k

Still filing today

59%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthEnvironmentHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RI
    READYKIDS INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $540k · revenue +31%
  • BR
    BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +51%
  • C
    COMPUTERS4KIDS
    9× · 2017–2025 · $245k · revenue +68%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA
    one grant, 2017 · $150k
  • CB
    CHARLOTTESVILLE BALLET ACADEMY
    one grant, 2020 · $15k
  • UW
    UNITED WAY
    one grant, 2019 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Virginia Community Action Partnership Inc

Virginia community action partnership (vacap) is the statewide membership association for virginia's thirty-one non-profit and public community action agencies. vacaps mission is to build the capacity and competencies of virginias…

Human Services
2
The Commonwealth Institute for

To use policy, research, and analysis to advance the well-being of Virginia communities, and improve the economic security and social opportunities of all Virginians.

Public Benefit
3
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
4
Startup Virginia Inc

Startup virginia is a non-profit, high-growth-business incubator, dedicated to building a long-term, sustainable economy for virginia. we connect our startup community to exceptional mentors and extensive programs in a dynamic workspace.

Community Improvement
5
Voices for Virginia's Children

The mission of voices for virginia's children is to champion public policies and legislation that achieve positive and equitable outcomes for young people.

Civil Rights
6
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
7
The West Virginia Chamber Foundation
Public Benefit
8
Vpm Media Corporation

To use the power of media to educate, entertain and inspire, using public television and public radio to make a positive impact on the communities throughout central virginia, charlottesville, the shenandoah valley, the northern neck and…

Arts & Culture
9
Charlottesville Regional Chamber of Comm

The charlottesville regional chamber of commerce is a non-profit corporation organized under the laws of the commonwealth of virginia for the purpose of representing private enterprise, promoting business, economic growth and vitality, and…

—
10
Virginia Interfaith Power & Light

Virginia Interfaith Power & Light collaborates among people of faith and conscience to grow healthy communities by advancing climate and environmental education.

Environment
11
Virginia Center for Public Press

Vcpp operates wrir 97.3 lpfm, a community low power fm radio station serving citizens of the city of richmond, virginia, and surrounding counties. the station covers a listening area of approximately 5-7 miles. wrir broadcasts news, views…

Arts & Culture
12
Virginia Community Food Connections

Our mission is to ensure the availability, access, and affordability of locally produced food by connecting local farmers and all members of the community through programs, awareness, and advocacy.

Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Charlottesville Free Clinic; the most unlike its peers is Virginia Institute of Autism Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
16/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CACF: $270,000 · OtherCACFMADISON HOUSE-UVA: $265,000 · OtherMADISON HOUSE-UVABLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $245,000 · OtherBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INCSALVATION ARMY: $240,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMYSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $160,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-WOMEN'S CENTER: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA-WOMEN'S CENTERUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIAUNIVERSITY OF VRIGINIA-COMPUTER SCIENCES CENTER: $150,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VRIGINIA-COMPUTER SCIENCES CENTERTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $150,000 · OtherTRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INCPUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $145,000 · OtherPUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATIONBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERS: $145,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS & BIG SISTERSFRONT PORCH: $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $90,000 · OtherVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC: $105,000 · OtherCHARLOTTESVILLE TOMORROW: $90,000 · Other+5 more: $145,700 · Other+5 moreREADYKIDS INC: $540,000 · Human ServicesREADYKIDS INCCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $241,000 · HealthCHARLOTTES…THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE: $200,000 · HealthTHE WOMEN'…THE PARAMOUNT THEATER FOUNDATION IN F/K/A THE PARAMOUNT THEATER INC: $225,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PARAMO…LIGHT HOUSE STUDIO INC: $100,000 · Arts & CultureLIGHT HOUS…VIRGINIA DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $85,000 · Arts & CultureVIRGINIA D…COMPUTERS4KIDS: $245,000 · Youth DevelopmentAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $160,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE: $82,500 · EnvironmentWILDROCK INC: $120,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$2,590,700Human Services$540,000Health$441,000Arts & Culture$410,000Youth Development$245,000Environment$242,500Recreation & Sports$120,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetREADYKIDS INC: $540,000 over 9y, 3.9% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC: $245,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetCOMPUTERS4KIDS: $245,000 over 9y, 6.7% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC: $241,000 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetTHE PARAMOUNT THEATER FOUNDATION IN F/K/A THE PARAMOUNT THEATER INC: $225,000 over 9y, 17% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE: $200,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $160,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetAPPALACHIAN VOICES: $160,000 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetWILDROCK INC: $120,000 over 8y, 6.5% of budgetVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC: $105,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetLIGHT HOUSE STUDIO INC: $100,000 over 4y, 8.2% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE TOMORROW: $90,000 over 9y, 2.2% of budgetVIRGINIA DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $85,000 over 7y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE: $82,500 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetWorkSource Enterprises: $20,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds READYKIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds COMPUTERS4KIDS ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE PARAMOUNT THEATER FOUNDATION IN F/K/A THE PARAMOUNT THEATER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds APPALACHIAN VOICES ↗
  • Who funds TRI-RIVER HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds WILDROCK INC ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF AUTISM INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT HOUSE STUDIO INC ↗
  • Who funds CHARLOTTESVILLE TOMORROW ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds WorkSource Enterprises ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA30× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · The J & E Berkley Foundation · Manning Family Foundation · The Rimora Foundation · The Genan Foundation · Caplin Foundation · The Farkas Family Foundation · Leaw Family Foundation Inc · The Charles Fund Inc · Westwind Foundation · The Hartfield Fdn Inc 0739-80-42

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hilltop Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hilltop Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hilltop’s filings →

    More from the funding graph