Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hartfield Fdn Inc 0739-80-42

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$110k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Arts & Culture$2.1MEnvironment$1.5MFood & Nutrition$499kEducation$490kCrime & Legal$280kHuman Services$275kHealth$145kPublic Benefit$125kOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k18 grants · $76k
  • $10k–50k22 grants · $410k
  • $50k–250k12 grants · $915k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
McClatchy Journalism Institute$110,000
North Carolina Museum of Art Foundation$100,000
Ocean Conservancy$100,000
Independent Curators International$100,000
Southern Environmental Law Center$100,000
Cultivate Charlottesville$75,000
City of Promise Inc$75,000
Norton Museum of Art Inc$55,000
Potential Energy Coalition Inc$50,000
Rocky Mountain Institute$50,000
Solomon R Guggenheim Foundation$50,000
Legal Aid Justice Center$50,000
Public Art Fund Inc$40,000
Perez Art Museum Miami$35,000
Land Trust Alliance Incorporated$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $116k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 14% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PRIME Coalition Inc: $100k → 8%Area Interfaith Outreach: $8k → 11%Area Interfaith Outreach: $8k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
IA
PA
CT
RI
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$5.2M · 59 repeat orgs$307k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

59 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

59
14

Total granted

$5.2M
$222k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+7%

Still filing today

88%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $400k · revenue +133%
  • CC
    Cultivate Charlottesville
    4× · 2021–2024 · $393k · revenue +15%
  • SOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER
    4× · 2021–2024 · $390k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • PC
    PRIME COALITION INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • CC
    COMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +39%
  • LF
    LOCAL FOOD HUB INC
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -68%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
2
Climate Museum

The climate museum's mission is to inspire action on the climate crisis with programming across the arts and sciences that deepens understanding, builds connections, and advances just solutions.

Arts & Culture
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Central Indiana Corporate Partnership Inc

Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…

Community Improvement
5
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
6
The Cultural Landscape Foundation

A non-profit established in 1998, the cultural landscape foundation (tclf) connects people to places. tclf educates and engages the public to make our shared landscape heritage more visible, identify its value, and empower its stewards.…

Arts & Culture
7
Center for International Environmental Law Inc

To investigate, research, write, publish, present conferences and teach with respect to global, regional, transboundary, and comparative environmental issues and to make the findings from such activities available to the general public; to…

International
8
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
9
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
10
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
11
Climate Leadership Council Inc

To develop and promote a carbon dividends framework - based on carbon fees whose revenues are rebated to citizens through dividends - as the most cost-effective, equitable, and politically viable climate solution.

Environment
12
Museum of Arts and Design

To collect, display and interpret objects in craft art and design.

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Prime Coalition Inc and the most unlike its peers is Salish School of Spokane. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Research and AdvocacyWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesLocal History MuseumsCommunity Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesCancer Support ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Public Library OperationsCommunity College Foundatio…Health Access Advocacy and …Local Food System Organizat…Environmental Conservation …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%26%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%13%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr13%45%35–55yr16%20%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/67
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,498

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 78 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
65/65
Grantees still filing
49/65
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $400,000 · Arts & CultureNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FO…INDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL — $370,000 · Arts & CultureINDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIO…NORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $220,000 · Arts & CultureNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INCSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $200,000 · Arts & CultureSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATIONJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC — $140,000 · Arts & CultureJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIA…THE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY — $70,000 · Arts & CultureNEWPORT ART MUSEUM AND ART ASSOCIATION — $60,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $115,000 · Arts & Culture+8 moreSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $390,000 · OtherSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTERRocky Mountain Institute — $250,000 · OtherRocky Mountain InstitutePUBLIC ART FUND INC — $140,000 · OtherPUBLIC ART FUND INCCompany of the Redwood Library — $90,000 · OtherPiedmont Virginia Community College — $80,000 · OtherJournalism Funding Partners — $200,000 · OtherJournalism Funding PartnersJEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $70,000 · OtherPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING — $75,000 · Other+29 more — $755,500 · Other+29 moreOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $380,000 · EnvironmentOCEAN CONSERV…WINDWARD FUND — $50,000 · EnvironmentWINDWARD FUNDECOAMERICA — $35,000 · EnvironmentTHE YEARS PROJECT INC — $35,000 · EnvironmentLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentCOMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE — $25,000 · EnvironmentBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $25,000 · Environment+7 more — $78,500 · Environment+7 moreCultivate Charlottesville — $393,000 · Youth DevelopmentCITY OF PROMISE INC — $275,000 · Human ServicesPRIME COALITION INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesAREA INTERFAITH OUTREACH — $16,000 · Human ServicesASPEN GLOBAL CHANGE INSTITUTE INC — $102,500 · EducationHACKS HACKERS — $75,000 · EducationST GEORGE'S SCHOOL — $60,000 · EducationWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $50,000 · Education+2 more — $20,000 · EducationLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER — $200,000 · Crime & LegalTHE FOUNTAIN FUND — $80,000 · Crime & Legal
Arts & Culture$1,575,000Other$2,050,500Environment$658,500Youth Development$393,000Human Services$391,000Education$307,500Crime & Legal$280,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF ART FOUNDATION — $400,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCultivate Charlottesville — $393,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER — $390,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY — $380,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINDEPENDENT CURATORS INTERNATIONAL — $370,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetCITY OF PROMISE INC — $275,000 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetRocky Mountain Institute — $250,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNORTON MUSEUM OF ART INC — $220,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $200,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJournalism Funding Partners — $200,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetLEGAL AID JUSTICE CENTER — $200,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetJORGE M PEREZ ART MUSEUM OF MIAMI-DADE COUNTY INC — $140,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPUBLIC ART FUND INC — $140,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetASPEN GLOBAL CHANGE INSTITUTE INC — $102,500 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetPRIME COALITION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTHE FOUNTAIN FUND — $80,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetPULITZER CENTER ON CRISIS REPORTING — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHACKS HACKERS — $75,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetJEFFERSON SCHOLARS FOUNDATION — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PRESERVATION SOCIETY OF NEWPORT COUNTY — $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNEWPORT ART MUSEUM AND ART ASSOCIATION — $60,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetST GEORGE'S SCHOOL — $60,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY INVESTMENT COLLABORATIVE — $60,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPotential Energy Coalition Inc — $56,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHARITIES AID FOUNDATION AMERICA — $53,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESLEYAN UNIVERSITY — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHARLOTTESVILLE TOMORROW — $50,000 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetBLUE RIDGE AREA FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S INITIATIVE — $50,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetWINDWARD FUND — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL STUDIO & CURATORIAL PROGRAM INC — $45,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetNewport Hospital Foundation — $40,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetECOAMERICA — $35,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE YEARS PROJECT INC — $35,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER CHARLOTTESVILLE — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetHealth in Harmony — $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetLAND TRUST ALLIANCE INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY CLIMATE COLLABORATIVE — $25,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetBLUE HILL HERITAGE TRUST — $25,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetWILDROCK INC — $25,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetFIGHTING CHANCE INC — $20,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetNEWPORT FILM INC — $20,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR NONPROFIT EXCELLENCE — $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBLITHEWOLD INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetAREA INTERFAITH OUTREACH — $16,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLOCAL FOOD HUB INC — $15,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetThe Newport Tree Conservancy — $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Charlottesville Area …The Genan FoundationThe Charles Fund IncManning Family Founda…Perry Foundation IncCaplin FoundationSentara HealthCassiopeia Foundation…Oakwood Foundation Ch…United Way of Greater…The J & E Berkley Fou…The Oak Hill Fund
Charlottesville Area Community FoundationVA42.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Charlottesville Area Community Foundation · The Genan Foundation · The Charles Fund Inc · Manning Family Foundation · Perry Foundation Inc · Caplin Foundation · Sentara Health · Cassiopeia Foundation Inc · Oakwood Foundation Charitable Trust · United Way of Greater Charlottesville · The J & E Berkley Foundation · The Oak Hill Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hartfield Fdn Inc 0739-80-42 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Wesleyan University — 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hartfield Fdn Inc 0739-80-42?

Find your warmest path to The Hartfield Fdn Inc 0739-80-42 through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 78 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home