Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hilb Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2025.

Health$242kHuman Services$147kEducation$112kReligion$95kRecreation & Sports$45kHousing & Shelter$11kYouth Development$6kAnimals$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
$3,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AGING CARE CONNECTIONS$25,000
BOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION$25,000
THE LIGHTHOUSE RVA$17,000
GLEN OAKS HOSPITALCHRISTOPHER LYONS FND$7,000
MULLIGANEERS CLUB$7,000
BRIDGE COMMUNITIES$6,000
IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB$3,000
THE PEAVEY PROJECT$2,500
ILLUME FAMILY RECOVERY$2,500
ELLIS REED PARLIER FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP$2,000
YOUNG IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB$1,000
YOUNG LIFE$1,000
ST GABRIELS EDUCATION MINISTRY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $25k → 14%THE LIGHTHOUSE RVA: $17k → 6%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $22k → 14%THE LIGHTHOUSE RVA: $10k → 6%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $21k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $20k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $20k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $20k → 14%AGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $20k → 14%LOCAL GLASS STUDIO FOUNDATION: $2k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$644k · 15 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against +48% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
5

Total granted

$644k
$8k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+48%

Still filing today

60%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterAnimalsYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    BOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION
    7× · 2019–2025 · $156k · revenue +279% · 47% of their budget
  • AC
    AGING CARE CONNECTIONS
    7× · 2019–2025 · $147k · revenue +83%
  • SA
    St Andrew's School
    7× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +51%

Funded once

  • DH
    DUKE HOSPITAL ELONATHAN
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • LG
    Local Glass Studio Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $2k · 43% of their budget
  • ER
    ELLIS REED PARLIER FAMILY SCHOLARSH
    one grant, 2024 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Family Lifeline

Family lifeline partners with families and individuals, delivering intensive home and community-based services to achieve an equitable, resilient community where families and individuals are connected, safe, and living a healthy,…

Human Services
2
Child & Family Services of Eastern Va Inc D/B/a the Up Center

The up center has provided a safety net for the hampton roads community for 142 years. presently, we impact approximately 10,000 people each year. our mission is to partner with children, families, and communities to improve lives and…

Human Services
3
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
4
St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services
5
Revive Inc

Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…

Health
6
Bridges to Independence

Bridges' mission is to break cycles of generational poverty by providing emergency shelter, counseling, and financial assistance for persons from arlington, virginia. bridges to independence also operates the bonder and amanda johnson…

Housing & Shelter
7
Depaul Community Resources

Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…

—
8
Southlight Healthcare Inc

Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.

Health
9
Graham Windham

To make a life-altering difference with children, youth and families who are overcoming some of life's most difficult challenges and obstacles, by helping to build a strong foundation for life: a safe, loving, permanent family and the…

Human Services
10
Bright Spot Network

Provide young cancer survivors who are parents of small children with a safe space for individual and familial healing, recovery and reconnection.

Health
11
St Vincent De Paul of Baltimore Inc

To ensure that those impacted by poverty have the skills and resources to achieve their full potential.

Human Services
12
Braveworks

Our vision is to be a catalyst for god-inspired transformation through artisan enterprise, leading to abundant & purposeful lives. our mission is to empower women & families overcoming trauma & injustice, bridging the gap from pain to…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Urban Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Local Glass Studio Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
10/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOCUS Fellowship of Christian Univ&Sch: $68,000 · OtherFOCUS Fellowship of Christian Uni…MULLIGANEERS CLUB: $45,000 · OtherMULLIGANEERS CLUBGLEN OAKS HOSPITALCHRISTOPHER LYONS FND: $44,000 · OtherGLEN OAKS HOSPITALCHRISTOPHER LYO…IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB: $18,500 · OtherIRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB+8 more: $16,700 · Other+8 moreAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $147,000 · Human ServicesAGING CARE CONNECTIONSTHE LIGHTHOUSERVA: $27,000 · Human ServicesTHE LIGHTHOUSERVA+1 more: $2,000 · Human ServicesBOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION: $156,000 · HealthBOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANI…Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $7,500 · Health+1 more: $2,500 · HealthSt Andrew's School: $79,000 · EducationSt Andrew's Schoo…UP RVA: $24,500 · EducationUP RVABRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $11,000 · Housing & ShelterYOUNG LIFE: $6,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE PEAVEY PROJECT: $2,500 · Public BenefitALL ASPECTS SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,000 · Animals
Other$192,200Human Services$176,000Health$166,000Education$103,500Housing & Shelter$11,000Youth Development$6,000Public Benefit$2,500Animals$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION: $156,000 over 7y, 47% of budgetAGING CARE CONNECTIONS: $147,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSt Andrew's School: $79,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTHE LIGHTHOUSERVA: $27,000 over 2y, 4.3% of budgetUP RVA: $24,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC: $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation: $7,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PEAVEY PROJECT: $2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetALL ASPECTS SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetLocal Glass Studio Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 43% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds AGING CARE CONNECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
  • Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSERVA ↗
  • Who funds UP RVA ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
  • Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
  • Who funds ILLUME FAMILY RECOVERY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEAVEY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds ALL ASPECTS SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds Local Glass Studio Foundation ↗
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation IncVA15.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hilb Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hilb Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hilb Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph