· Private foundation
The Hilb Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $33k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $67k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| AGING CARE CONNECTIONS | $25,000 |
| BOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION | $25,000 |
| THE LIGHTHOUSE RVA | $17,000 |
| GLEN OAKS HOSPITALCHRISTOPHER LYONS FND | $7,000 |
| MULLIGANEERS CLUB | $7,000 |
| BRIDGE COMMUNITIES | $6,000 |
| IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB | $3,000 |
| ILLUME FAMILY RECOVERY | $2,500 |
| THE PEAVEY PROJECT | $2,500 |
| ELLIS REED PARLIER FAMILY SCHOLARSHIP | $2,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $1,000 |
| ST GABRIELS EDUCATION MINISTRY | $1,000 |
| YOUNG IRISH FELLOWSHIP CLUB | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $176k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 84% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +48% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $8k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BBBOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION7× · 2019–2025 · $156k · revenue +279% · 47% of their budget
- ACAGING CARE CONNECTIONS7× · 2019–2025 · $147k · revenue +83%
- SASt Andrew's School7× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- DHDUKE HOSPITAL ELONATHANone grant, 2019 · $3k
- LGLocal Glass Studio Foundationone grant, 2024 · $2k · 43% of their budget
- ERELLIS REED PARLIER FAMILY SCHOLARSHone grant, 2024 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Family lifeline partners with families and individuals, delivering intensive home and community-based services to achieve an equitable, resilient community where families and individuals are connected, safe, and living a healthy,…
The up center has provided a safety net for the hampton roads community for 142 years. presently, we impact approximately 10,000 people each year. our mission is to partner with children, families, and communities to improve lives and…
See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…
For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)
Empowering individuals on their journey to lasting recovery. our team of dedicated professionals offer a dynamic blend of therapeutic support and personal empowerment. we dont just offer recovery; we provide a roadmap to your vibrant…
Bridges' mission is to break cycles of generational poverty by providing emergency shelter, counseling, and financial assistance for persons from arlington, virginia. bridges to independence also operates the bonder and amanda johnson…
Depaul serves children and families involved in the child welfare system and children and adults with developmental disabilities. vision: opening doors to hope and belonging. corporate mission: we work to support the success of our cients…
Southlight healthcare provides access to high-quality mental health and substance use treatment, fostering a resilient community by supporting individuals in their recovery.
To make a life-altering difference with children, youth and families who are overcoming some of life's most difficult challenges and obstacles, by helping to build a strong foundation for life: a safe, loving, permanent family and the…
Provide young cancer survivors who are parents of small children with a safe space for individual and familial healing, recovery and reconnection.
To ensure that those impacted by poverty have the skills and resources to achieve their full potential.
Our vision is to be a catalyst for god-inspired transformation through artisan enterprise, leading to abundant & purposeful lives. our mission is to empower women & families overcoming trauma & injustice, bridging the gap from pain to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Breakthrough Urban Ministries Inc and the most unlike its peers is Local Glass Studio Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOSOM BUDDIES BENEFIT ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds AGING CARE CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds St Andrew's School ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSERVA ↗
- Who funds UP RVA ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE COMMUNITIES INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital and Healthcare Services Foundation ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds THE PEAVEY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ILLUME FAMILY RECOVERY INC ↗
- Who funds Local Glass Studio Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALL ASPECTS SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH URBAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hilb Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.