Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Highfield Foundation Fifth Third Bank

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
15
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Environment$396kEducation$272kArts & Culture$134kHealth$113kPhilanthropy$89kHousing & Shelter$88kHuman Services$65kReligion$46kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $103k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $131k
$5,000
Median grant
15
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$35,000
Proctor Academy$30,000
PACIFIC CLINICS$16,000
New Avenues for Youth$16,000
Vermont Land Trust Inc$12,000
The Nature Conservancy in Vermont$12,000
RESOLVE INC$10,000
Individual grant recipient$7,000
Ben Lomond Quaker Center Association$6,000
AVA GALLERY & ART CENTER$5,000
Oceans Initiative$5,000
LEWA WILDLIFE CONSERVANCY$5,000
MINNESOTA INDIAN WOMENS SEXUAL$5,000
DANCE COMPLEX$5,000
Caravan to Class$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $16k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 19% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ON THE RISE INC: $8k → 8%Michigan League for Public Policy: $1k → 9%Michigan League for Public Policy: $1k → 9%Michigan League for Public Policy: $1k → 9%HOMELESS EMPOWERMENT PROJECT INC: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
NH
WA
MT
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
CA
CO
KY
VA
NM
NC
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 44 repeat orgs$204k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

44 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

44
21

Total granted

$1.2M
$108k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+13%

Still filing today

70%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationArts & CultureScience & TechHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PA
    PROCTOR ACADEMY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $188k · revenue +38%
  • NA
    NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +33%
  • VERMONT LAND TRUST INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $77k · revenue +32%

Funded once

  • DU
    DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING
    one grant, 2023 · $8k
  • DP
    DOGGIE PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR HOMELESS TAILSgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +134%
  • OT
    ON THE RISE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue +27%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
The Climate Center

The Climate Center is a climate and energy policy nonprofit working to rapidly reduce climate pollution at scale, starting in California.

Education
5
Land Conservancy of West Michigan

Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…

Environment
6
Global Forest Generation

Global Forest Generation restores and protects forest ecosystems in partnership with grassroots leaders and local communities across vast landscapes which play a critical role in preserving water, protecting biodiversity, storing carbon,…

Environment
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Climate Foundation

To research and develop healthy climate solutions comprising global food security, ecosystem regeneration and carbon balance in seas and soils.

Science & Tech
9
Oikonos - Ecosystem Knowledge

Oikonos studies and protects imperiled ecosystems by engaging diverse communities through innovative scientific and artistic collaborations.

Science & Tech
10
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
11
Wildlife Conservation Network Inc

Connect conservationists and supporters, deploy resources to the field, provide conservationists with tools and support they need to succeed.

Animals
12
One Earth Philanthropy

One Earth's mission is to empower everyone, everywhere, with the knowledge, inspiration, and opportunity to heal the Earth and reclaim our future.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Greater Flint; the most unlike its peers is Foundation for Climate Restoration Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
56/57
Grantees still filing
31/57
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $79,700 · OtherNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INCThe Nature Conservancy in Vermont: $79,000 · OtherThe Nature Conservancy in VermontIndividual grant recipient: $54,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $44,000 · OtherCORA Community Overcoming Relationship AbuseCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $35,000 · OtherUF Center for NeuroGenetics: $28,000 · OtherBEN LOMOND QUAKER CENTER ASSOCIATION: $28,000 · OtherFlint Institute of Science & History: $27,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $27,000 · OtherCHAC FKA COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL: $46,000 · OtherCHAC FKA COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL+35 more: $223,300 · Other+35 morePROCTOR ACADEMY: $188,000 · EducationPROCTOR ACADEMYPlanetwork: $27,000 · EducationPlanetworkFRIENDS OF LES CHENEAUX COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $13,000 · EducationLSU FOUNDATION: $13,000 · EducationFRIENDS OF THE FLINT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $12,000 · Education+2 more: $11,000 · EducationVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $77,000 · EnvironmentVERMONT LAND TRU…SIX RIVERS LAND CONSERVANCY FKA SIX RIVERS REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $30,000 · EnvironmentSIX RIVERS LAND …YELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $24,000 · EnvironmentYELLOWSTONE FORE…FOUNDATION FOR CLIMATE RESTORATION INC: $19,000 · EnvironmentFOUNDATION FOR C…Rainforest Action Network: $16,500 · EnvironmentRainforest Actio…UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $16,000 · EnvironmentUPPER VALLEY LAN…Flint River Watershed Coalition: $15,000 · EnvironmentFlint River Wate…+1 more: $3,000 · EnvironmentRESOLVE INC: $45,000 · AnimalsBROOKE USA INC: $10,000 · AnimalsWASHINGTON HEALTH OUTREACH: $9,000 · AnimalsDOGGIE PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR HOMELESS TAILS: $8,000 · AnimalsAKASHINGA INC: $5,000 · AnimalsLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $5,000 · AnimalsDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $5,000 · AnimalsTRAP DAT CAT INC: $5,000 · AnimalsCommunity Gallery Inc: $50,000 · Arts & CultureKURT VONNEGUT MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureFlint Cultural Center Corporation: $7,000 · Arts & CultureKREWE OF RED BEANS: $6,000 · Arts & CultureVERMONT PUBLIC CO: $4,000 · Arts & CulturePBS FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Arts & CultureCaravan to Class: $33,000 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $15,000 · PhilanthropyBoston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office: $5,000 · PhilanthropyOceans Initiative: $26,000 · Science & TechNational Center for Science Education: $20,000 · Science & TechBuckminster Fuller Institute: $5,000 · Science & Tech
Other$671,000Education$264,000Environment$200,500Animals$92,000Arts & Culture$78,500Philanthropy$53,000Science & Tech$51,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPROCTOR ACADEMY: $188,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetNEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC: $79,700 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetVERMONT LAND TRUST INC: $77,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCommunity Gallery Inc: $50,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetCHAC FKA COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL: $46,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetRESOLVE INC: $45,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse: $44,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetCaravan to Class: $33,000 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetSIX RIVERS LAND CONSERVANCY FKA SIX RIVERS REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY: $30,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetBEN LOMOND QUAKER CENTER ASSOCIATION: $28,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetFlint Institute of Science & History: $27,000 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetPlanetwork: $27,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $27,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOceans Initiative: $26,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetYELLOWSTONE FOREVER: $24,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetNational Center for Science Education: $20,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CLIMATE RESTORATION INC: $19,000 over 6y, 4.7% of budgetRainforest Action Network: $16,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetUPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC: $16,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT: $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFlint River Watershed Coalition: $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF LES CHENEAUX COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $13,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetLSU FOUNDATION: $13,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE FLINT PUBLIC LIBRARY: $12,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetCOMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKE USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetWASHINGTON HEALTH OUTREACH: $9,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCOLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE: $8,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDOGGIE PROTECTIVE SERVICES FOR HOMELESS TAILS: $8,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetON THE RISE INC: $8,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwest Family Assistance Center: $7,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKURT VONNEGUT MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC: $7,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFlint Cultural Center Corporation: $7,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLES CHENEAUX CULINARY SCHOOL INC: $6,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMINDS MATTER OF BOSTON INC: $6,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLES CHENEAUX HISTORICAL ASSOCIATON: $6,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetKREWE OF RED BEANS: $6,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAKASHINGA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBuckminster Fuller Institute: $5,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLewa Wildlife Conservancy USA: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDENVER DUMB FRIENDS LEAGUE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW DANCE COMPLEX INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTRAP DAT CAT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetBoston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFreedom House Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVERMONT PUBLIC CO: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Pacifica Foundation: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PROCTOR ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds NEW AVENUES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
  • Who funds VERMONT LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds Community Gallery Inc ↗
  • Who funds CHAC FKA COMMUNITY HEALTH AWARENESS COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds RESOLVE INC ↗
  • Who funds CORA Community Overcoming Relationship Abuse ↗
  • Who funds Caravan to Class ↗
  • Who funds SIX RIVERS LAND CONSERVANCY FKA SIX RIVERS REGIONAL LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds BEN LOMOND QUAKER CENTER ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds Flint Institute of Science & History ↗
  • Who funds Planetwork ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds Oceans Initiative ↗
  • Who funds YELLOWSTONE FOREVER ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Science Education ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATION FOR CLIMATE RESTORATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Rainforest Action Network ↗
  • Who funds UPPER VALLEY LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER FLINT ↗
  • Who funds Flint River Watershed Coalition ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF LES CHENEAUX COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds LSU FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE FLINT PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY PASSAGEWAYS ↗
  • Who funds BROOKE USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON HEALTH OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds COLLECTIVE HERITAGE INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Heron Oaks FoundationOH24.2× affinity9 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Heron Oaks Foundation · Charles Stewart Mott Foundation · Ruth Mott Foundation · Impactassetsinc · Boston Foundation Inc · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Marin Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Gannett Foundation Inc · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Highfield Foundation Fifth Third Bank funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Highfield Foundation Fifth Third Bank. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Vermont Land Trust Inc: 42% of income from government
  • On the Rise Inc: 39% of income from government
  • New Avenues for Youth Inc: 20% of income from government
  • The New Dance Complex Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Vermont Public Co: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Highfield Foundation Fifth Third Bank’s filings →

More from the funding graph