Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hibel Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$292k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it funds
0182% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Education$358kPhilanthropy$173kReligion$150kInternational$47kCrime & Legal$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $133k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$26,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$55k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Oak Park Temple$75,000
Natl Assoc of Charitable Gift Planners$50,000
Norfolk St University$45,500
Delaware St University$34,475
AFP Foundation for Philanthropy$27,300
CASE$26,000
CASE$7,600
Jewish United Foundation$7,600
University of IL Foundation$7,600
Oregon State University$7,600
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc$3,800
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $47k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Poverty Alleviation: $36k → 14%Poverty Alleviation: $11k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
MI
MA
OR
IN
PA
NJ
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$734k · 13 repeat orgs$73k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against -4% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$734k
$46k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-4%

Still filing today

38%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $27k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesCivil RightsArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHARITABLE GIFT PLANNERS INC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $103k · revenue +40%
  • LC
    LETTERS CHARITY
    2× · 2022–2023 · $47k · revenue +87%
  • University of Illinois Foundation
    5× · 2021–2025 · $37k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • LF
    Lilly Family School of Philanthropy
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • University of Chicago
    2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +22%
  • TF
    THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $8k · revenue -4%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
4
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
National Association of College and University Attorneys

To advance the practice of higher education attorneys for the benefit of the institutions they serve.

—
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
12
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Afp Foundation for Philanthropy; the most unlike its peers is Rock and Soul Forever Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
8/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BNAI ABRAHAM-ZION CONGREGATION: $150,000 · OtherBNAI ABRAHAM-ZION CONGREGATIONNorfolk St University: $100,500 · OtherNorfolk St UniversityDelaware St University: $90,015 · OtherDelaware St UniversityIndividual grant recipient: $53,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCASE: $48,700 · OtherCASEAFP FOUNDATION FOR PHILANTHROPY: $27,300 · OtherLilly Family School of Philanthropy: $25,000 · OtherJewish United Foundation: $22,700 · OtherOregon State University: $22,700 · Other+2 more: $11,300 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHARITABLE GIFT PLANNERS INC: $103,000 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL ASSOC…+1 more: $1,000 · PhilanthropyUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $36,950 · EducationUniversity of …VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $26,400 · EducationVIRGINIA TECH …TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $22,600 · EducationTRUSTEES OF BO…University of Chicago: $10,000 · EducationUniversity of …THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $7,500 · EducationTHE FRANK LLOY…LETTERS CHARITY: $47,000 · Human ServicesROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 · Arts & CultureEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 · Civil RightsFUSION ACADEMY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $350 · Recreation & Sports
Other$551,715Philanthropy$104,000Education$103,450Human Services$47,000Arts & Culture$26,000Civil Rights$1,000Recreation & Sports$350

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHARITABLE GIFT PLANNERS INC: $103,000 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetLETTERS CHARITY: $47,000 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetUniversity of Illinois Foundation: $36,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC: $26,400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE: $22,600 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetUniversity of Chicago: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION: $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO COUNCIL ON PLANNED GIVING: $1,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFUSION ACADEMY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION: $350 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHARITABLE GIFT PLANNERS INC ↗
  • Who funds LETTERS CHARITY ↗
  • Who funds University of Illinois Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AFP FOUNDATION FOR PHILANTHROPY ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCK AND SOUL FOREVER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds University of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds THE FRANK LLOYD WRIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COUNCIL ON PLANNED GIVING ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds FUSION ACADEMY SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hibel Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hibel Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Trustees of Boston College: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hibel Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hibel Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hibel Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph