Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hermoine & Glen Nelson Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$710k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$3.4MArts & Culture$600kHousing & Shelter$500kHuman Services$450kEducation$150kYouth Development$90kEmployment$40kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $345k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$70,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MONROE CARELL JR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$250,000
JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION$200,000
BROOKS HOUSE$75,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NASHVILLE$70,000
DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TN$45,000
BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION$40,000
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $245k) land where the poverty rate runs at 5%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $40k → 4%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $40k → 4%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $40k → 4%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $20k → 4%WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CTR: $15k → 7%ASMT INC: $10k → 14%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $20k → 4%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $20k → 4%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $20k → 4%BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $20k → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.3M · 17 repeat orgs$25k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +56% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

17 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
2

Total granted

$5.3M
$25k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+41%

Still filing today

41%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JT
    JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $705k · revenue +256%
  • DS
    DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE
    8× · 2018–2025 · $285k · revenue +23%
  • BT
    BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +69% · 51% of their budget

Funded once

  • WC
    WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +41%
  • AI
    ASMT INC dba AUTISM TENNESSEE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Transformations Autism Treatment Center

It is the organization's mission to provide every family and individual with autism spectrum disorders a place that they can receive the help they need to reach every goal in a safe, loving environment.

—
2
New Horizons in Autism Inc

New horizons in autism, inc. is dedicated to serving individuals with autism and their families in new jersey by delivering community based services; providing advocacy, support and technical assistance; increasing public awareness and…

—
3
Tennessee Health Care Association

To maintain high standards for nursing homes in the state of tennessee and to seek the solutions to problems common to members of the association.

—
4
Ascendigo Autism Services Inc

Ascendigo serves local, regional and national populations of youth and adults across the autism spectrum through experiential, community-based learning opportunities to enhance their health, abilities, personal growth and social engagement.

Health
5
Jobs Plus Incorporated

Provide day training and habilitation to adult individuals with developmental disabilities including an opportunity for integration, use of generic services, an opportunity to use natural and typical settings, services with age and social…

—
6
Alexander Leigh Center for Autism

To provide an environment where children on the autistic spectrum can develop their potential academically, emotionally, socially, communicatively, physically and gain functional independence using programs and methods that are selected…

Education
7
Developmental Services of Dickson County

To provide support and services for persons with disabilities to enable them to become active members of the community.

Human Services
8
The ArcDavidson County Inc

Provide housing for developmentally disabled adults. Also to develop and provide educational and recreational programs to children and adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

—
9
Special Olympics Tennessee Inc

To provide year-round sports training and athletic competition in a variety of olympic-type sports for children and adults with intellectual disabilities, giving them continuing opportunities to develop physical fitness, demonstrate…

—
10
Access Services of Middle Tennessee

Provides support services to individuals with disabilities in the form of outreach, training education, consultants and referrals requarding use of assistive technologies.

—
11
Job Options Inc

To actively seek employment for individuals with psychological or physical disabilities.

Employment
12
Quest Therapeutic Services Inc

To provide exceptional pediatric therapy services to enhance the lives of children with special needs.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New Horizons Coporation; the most unlike its peers is Love On a Leash Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANDERBILT CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $1,500,000 · OtherVANDERBILT CHILDREN'S HOSPITALMONROE CARELL JR CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $500,000 · OtherMONROE CARELL JR CHILDREN'S HOSPITALBROOKS HOUSE: $500,000 · OtherBROOKS HOUSERONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NASHVILLE: $435,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NASHVILLEHABITAT FOR HUMANITIES: $420,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITIESVANDERBILT BILL WILKERSON CENTER: $180,000 · OtherGILDA'S CLUB OF NASHVILLE: $175,000 · Other+4 more: $250,000 · Other+4 moreJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $705,000 · HealthJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDAT…DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $285,000 · HealthDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIA…+1 more: $30,000 · HealthBEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $220,000 · Human ServicesWILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $15,000 · Human ServicesASMT INC dba AUTISM TENNESSEE: $10,000 · Human ServicesVanderbilt University: $60,000 · EducationLOVE ON A LEASH INC: $30,000 · Community Improvement
Other$3,960,000Health$1,020,000Human Services$245,000Education$60,000Community Improvement$30,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC: $705,000 over 6y, 20% of budgetDOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE: $285,000 over 8y, 9.9% of budgetBEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION: $220,000 over 8y, 51% of budgetVanderbilt University: $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW HORIZONS COPORATION: $40,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSADDLE UP: $30,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetLOVE ON A LEASH INC: $30,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetWILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER: $15,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetASMT INC dba AUTISM TENNESSEE: $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds JORDAN THOMAS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE ↗
  • Who funds BEYOND THE HORIZON CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds NEW HORIZONS COPORATION ↗
  • Who funds SADDLE UP ↗
  • Who funds LOVE ON A LEASH INC ↗
  • Who funds WILSON COUNTY COMMUNITY HELP CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ASMT INC dba AUTISM TENNESSEE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee IncTN16.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation of Middle Tennessee Inc · Hca Healthcare Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hermoine & Glen Nelson Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hermoine & Glen Nelson Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Hermoine & Glen Nelson’s filings →

    More from the funding graph