Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Herbert M & Naomi R Leavitt Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$19k
Granted FY2025still arriving
23
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$61kArts & Culture$20kFood & Nutrition$20kInternational$17kEnvironment$13kEducation$13kScience & Tech$5kPublic Safety & Disaster$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
7
States reached
$269k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD$2,500
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA$2,000
THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION$2,000
SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK$1,500
COLUMBIA CLIMATE SCHOOL$1,000
DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION$1,000
ST MARY'S ARTS COUNCIL INC$1,000
MEDSTAR ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAT$1,000
SOUTHERN MARYLAND RC&D$500
LEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD$500
THE BERKELEY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FUND$500
THE JAZZ LOFT INC$500
DAMON RUNYON CANCER RESEARCH FOUND$500
Individual grant recipient$500
ANN'S CIRCLE INC ANNMARIE GARDEN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 42% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $3k → 19%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $3k → 19%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $3k → 19%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $3k → 19%THE EARTH INSTITUTE COLUMBIA UNIV: $1k → 17%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $3k → 19%THE EARTH INSTITUTE COLUMBIA UNIV: $1k → 17%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $2k → 19%THE EARTH INSTITUTE COLUMBIA UNIV: $1k → 17%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $2k → 19%THE EARTH INSTITUTE COLUMBIA UNIV: $1k → 17%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%THE GREENWELL FOUNDATION: $2k → 8%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $2k → 19%DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MD: $2k → 19%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%SOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $2k → 8%DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA: $2k → 17%WALDEN SIERRA INC: $2k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$149k · 23 repeat orgs$3k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +85% since the first grant, against -95% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
2

Total granted

$149k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
-95%

Still filing today

57%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationInternationalArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PP
    PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $21k · revenue +62%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +98%
  • GF
    GREENWELL FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $16k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • WS
    WALDEN SIERRA CORPORATION
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue -95%
  • UR
    UC REGENTS - AILEYCAMP
    one grant, 2023 · $250
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Society for Neuroscience

Sfn's mission is to: 1. advance the understanding of the brain and the nervous system by bringing together scientists of all segments of neuroscience, by facilitating the integration of research directed at all levels of biological…

Health
2
University of Maryland Surgical Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
3
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
4
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
University of Maryland Dermatologists Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
7
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
8
University of Maryland Neurology Associates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of Maryland Neurosurgeryassociates Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Education
10
University of Maryland Otorhino-Laryngology-Head & Neck Surgery Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

Health
11
American Astronomical Society

The american astronomical society (aas), established in 1899, is the major organization of professional astronomers in north america. the basic objective of the aas is to promote the advancement of astronomy and closely related branches of…

Science & Tech
12
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Mary's College of Maryland Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Walden Sierra Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GREENWELL FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 · OtherGREENWELL FOUNDATION INCSOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANK: $13,500 · OtherSOUTHERN MARYLAND FOOD BANKMEDSTAR ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDAT: $9,000 · OtherMEDSTAR ST MARY'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $9,000 · OtherDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATIONST MARY'S ARTS COUNCIL INC: $8,750 · OtherST MARY'S ARTS COUNCIL INCANN'S CIRCLE INC ANNMARIE GARDEN: $4,500 · OtherTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY: $4,500 · OtherJEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES: $4,500 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,500 · OtherST MARY'S WATERSHED ASSOCIATION: $4,500 · OtherCOLUMBIA CLIMATE SCHOOL: $4,000 · Other+5 more: $7,000 · Other+5 morePLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $20,500 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF …LEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $4,500 · HealthLEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER …GROWINGSTEMS INC: $3,000 · HealthGROWINGSTEMS INCWALDEN SIERRA CORPORATION: $2,000 · HealthWALDEN SIERRA CORPORAT…CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $2,000 · HealthCANCER RESEARCH FUND O…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $17,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SA…THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,750 · EducationST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 · EducationBerkeley Public Schools Fund: $750 · EducationTHE JAZZ LOFT INC: $4,500 · Arts & CultureLEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $4,500 · Public Safety & DisasterMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Other$89,250Health$32,000International$17,000Education$9,500Arts & Culture$4,500Public Safety & Disaster$4,500Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC: $20,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $17,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetGREENWELL FOUNDATION INC: $15,500 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetDERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK: $4,750 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JAZZ LOFT INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetLEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetTHE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $4,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetLEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGROWINGSTEMS INC: $3,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetSOUTHERN MARYLAND YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $2,500 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetWALDEN SIERRA CORPORATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBerkeley Public Schools Fund: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF MARYLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GREENWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DERMATOLOGY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds THE JAZZ LOFT INC ↗
  • Who funds LEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER RESCUE SQUAD INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds LEONARDTOWN VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARY'S COLLEGE OF MARYLAND FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MARIN AGRICULTURAL LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds GROWINGSTEMS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN MARYLAND YOUTH ORCHESTRA ↗
  • Who funds WALDEN SIERRA CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds CANCER RESEARCH FUND OF THE DAMON RUNYON-WALTER WINCHELL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Berkeley Public Schools Fund ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Herbert M & Naomi R Leavitt Family Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Herbert M & Naomi R Leavitt Family Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Planned Parenthood of Maryland Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Herbert M & Naomi R Leavitt Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph