Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Herbert & Judy Paige Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$295k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 46% of THE HERBERT & JUDY PAIGE FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $15k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $104k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $175k
$18,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$6.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST PAULS SENIOR SERVICES$75,000
TRU COMMUNITY CARE$50,000
DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION$50,000
SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY$40,000
A LITTLE HELP$20,000
COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF DENVER$18,000
VIA MOBILITY SERVICES$15,000
USC$11,364
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES$9,316
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF DENVER$827
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $345k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $2k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $50k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $50k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $30k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $28k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $90k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $15k → 12%TRU COMMUNITY CARE: $20k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $10k → 12%VIA MOBILITY SERVICES: $5k → 12%A LITTLE HELP: $20k → 12%A LITTLE HELP: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.8M · 18 repeat orgs$235k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.

18 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
6

Total granted

$1.8M
$218k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+9%

Still filing today

50%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $17k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DS
    DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $315k · revenue +91%
  • TC
    TRU COMMUNITY CARE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $180k · revenue +82%
  • SD
    SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
    5× · 2021–2025 · $175k · revenue +30%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF CO BOULDER LEEDS
    one grant, 2021 · $115k
  • UO
    UNIV OF CO BOULDER ENGINEERING
    one grant, 2021 · $70k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $21k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Urban Peak Denver

Urban peak helps youth experiencing homelessness and youth at risk of becoming homeless overcome real life challenges by providing essential services and a supportive community, empowering them to become self-sufficient adults.

Housing & Shelter
2
Denver Hybrid College

To support college students in innovative, affordable paths to in-demand careers and financial freedom.

Education
3
Denver Zoological Foundation

Inspiring communities to save wildlife for future generations.

Animals
4
10000 Degrees

10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…

Education
5
Metropolitan Denver Homeless Initiative Inc

Mission: leading and advancing collaboration to end homelessness in our region. vision: dedicated to everyone in the metro region having a safe, stable place to call home. values: committed to core values that bring people home: -…

Housing & Shelter
6
Safehouse Denver Inc

Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…

Human Services
7
Mental Health Center of Denver

We empower people to overcome barriers and achieve lasting well-being through collaborative behavioral health care and comprehensive support.

Health
8
Denver Children's Home

Denver children's home restores hope and health to traumatized children and families through a comprehensive array of therapeutic, educational, and community-based services.

Health
9
Center for Improving Value in Health Care

To equip partners and communities in colorado and across the nation with the resources, services and unbiased data needed to improve health and health care. we help communities, organizations and individuals identify opportunities to…

Health
10
The Greeley Dream Team Inc

To partner with the community to help children succeed in school and prevent student drop-out for students in greeley evans school district 6.

11
Careerwise Colorado

Careerwise's mission is to forge pathways to meaningful careers through bold advocacy, innovative apprenticeships, and industry led partnerships, creating a dynamic talent ecosystem that connects ambition to opportunity for empowered young…

Education
12
Colorado Health Institute
Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Dream Foundation and the most unlike its peers is San Diego Humane Society and Spca. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ST PAULS SR SERVICES — $152,450 · OtherST PAULS SR SERVICESST PAULS SENIOR SERVICES — $125,000 · OtherST PAULS SENIOR SERVICESCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF DENVER — $116,787 · OtherCOMMUNITY COLLEGE OF DENVERUNIVERSITY OF CO BOULDER LEEDS — $115,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF CO BOULDER LEEDSGIRLS INC — $72,000 · OtherGIRLS INCUNIV OF CO BOULDER ENGINEERING — $70,000 · OtherUNIV OF CO BOULDER ENGINEERINGI HAVE A DREAM OF BOULDER CTY — $69,000 · OtherI HAVE A DREAM OF BOULDER CTYI HAVE A DREAM FOUNDATION CO — $48,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO - BOULDER — $48,000 · OtherCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES — $44,316 · Other+7 more — $73,223 · Other+7 moreDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $315,000 · EducationDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATIONCOLLEGE TRACK — $104,000 · EducationCOLLEGE TRACKCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $95,000 · EducationCOLORADO UPLIFT INCDENVER KIDS INC — $72,000 · EducationDENVER KIDS INC+1 more — $827 · EducationTRU COMMUNITY CARE — $179,909 · Human ServicesTRU COMMUNITY CAREVia Mobility Services — $130,000 · Human ServicesVia Mobility Servic…A LITTLE HELP — $35,000 · Human ServicesA LITTLE HELPSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $175,000 · AnimalsSAN DIEGO…+1 more — $5,000 · Animals
Other$933,776Education$586,827Human Services$344,909Animals$180,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $315,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTRU COMMUNITY CARE — $179,909 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA — $175,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetVia Mobility Services — $130,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCOLLEGE TRACK — $104,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCOLORADO UPLIFT INC — $95,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetDENVER KIDS INC — $72,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetA LITTLE HELP — $35,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCOLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER — $827 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DENVER SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION
  • Who funds TRU COMMUNITY CARE
  • Who funds SAN DIEGO HUMANE SOCIETY AND SPCA
  • Who funds Via Mobility Services
  • Who funds COLLEGE TRACK
  • Who funds COLORADO UPLIFT INC
  • Who funds DENVER KIDS INC
  • Who funds A LITTLE HELP
  • Who funds COLORADO DREAM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE HUMANE SOCIETY OF BOULDER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Herbert & Judy Paige Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Herbert & Judy Paige Family Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Herbert & Judy Paige Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph