Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Helen C Cobbs Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$251k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$44k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$696kEducation$563kYouth Development$258kFood & Nutrition$207kHealth$120kHousing & Shelter$114kArts & Culture$106kReligion$6k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k12 grants · $232k
$12,550
Median grant
1
States reached
$4.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC$43,925
ROANOKE COLLEGE$37,650
ROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES (RAM HOUSE)$18,825
CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP (CHIP)$18,825
FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY$18,825
RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC$18,825
HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION$12,550
SALEM HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA SALEM MUSEUM$12,550
FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE$12,550
GIRL SCOUTS OF VIRGINIA SKYLINE COUNCIL INC$12,550
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC$12,550
WEST END CENTER$12,550
ADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY$9,412
SALEM AREA ECUMENICAL MINISTRIES$6,275
BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$3,138
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $805k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $20k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $19k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $19k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $18k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $18k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $18k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $18k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $15k → 20%RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $14k → 20%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $25k → 20%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $24k → 20%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $23k → 20%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $16k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $20k → 20%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $13k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $19k → 20%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $13k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $12k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $18k → 20%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $12k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $12k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $18k → 20%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $12k → 8%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $10k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $15k → 20%ADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $9k → 8%FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $14k → 20%FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $9k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $47k → 20%ADULT CARE CENTER: $6k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $44k → 20%ADULT CARE CENTER: $5k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $39k → 20%ADULT CARE CENTER: $5k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $37k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $37k → 20%ADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $3k → 8%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $37k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $36k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $30k → 20%PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $28k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.1M · 18 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 15 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
2

Total granted

$2.1M
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+102%

Still filing today

72%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHousing & ShelterReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER
    9× · 2017–2025 · $333k · revenue +179%
  • FS
    FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $176k · revenue +30%
  • TR
    THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $159k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • BF
    BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +47%
  • RA
    Renovation Alliance Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +102%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Roanoke Area Ministries

To serve the indigent.

—
2
Roane County Family Health Care Inc

The mission of roane family health care is to exceed the quality of care that our patients deserve and expect while surpassing community needs through innovative technology.

Health
3
Roanoke Valley Youth Soccer Club Inc

We aim to develop quality soccer players, as well as well-balanced, motivated individuals who are prepared to handle life's challenges. Our programs are designed to enhance each player's personal growth.

Recreation & Sports
4
Roanoke Symphony Orchestra

The Roanoke Symphony Orchestra provides a professional symphony orchestra of artistic excellence and integrity to enrich lives, to educate, and to entertain diverse audiences in western Virginia with the highest quality instrumental and…

Arts & Culture
5
Roanoke Gospel Outreach Center Inc

The center provides religious, educational, and charitable services including distributing clothing, refreshments, toys, gifts and religious instruction to the homeless and low income citizens of the community.

Religion
6
Robeson Health Care Corporation

Providing primary health care and professional counseling services to all indviduals who need it.

Health
7
Rooftop of Virginia Cap

Combat poverty by focusing on increasing self-sufficiency of low-income citizens.

Community Improvement
8
Rockbridge Recovery

Rockbridge Recovery supports individuals, families, and communities touched by addictive behaviors through support from peers, prevention, and education.

Health
9
Roanoke Regional Chamber of Commerce

The Chamber is a Business Advocate for the Roanoke Region.

—
10
Rappahannock Westminster-Canterbury Foundation

Primary mission is to extend the facilities and services of rw-c inc. to aid as many deserving individuals as can prudently be supported with the funds available to the foundation.

Education
11
Free Clinic of Rockingham County Inc

To provide for the basic medical and dental needs of the working poor of Rockingham County through volunteer medical professionals.

Health
12
Good Shepherd Episcopal School

The mission of Good Shepherd Episcopal School is to inspire each child to achieve academic excellence within a diverse, nurturing community that builds character and fosters respect for one another and our shared environment, locally and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Service of Roanoke Valley; the most unlike its peers is Renovation Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
8/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $333,389 · Human ServicesPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTERFAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $175,806 · Human ServicesFAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEYTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $158,616 · Human ServicesTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INCFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $109,038 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKEADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $28,437 · Human ServicesROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES (RAM HOUSE): $158,616 · OtherROANOKE AREA MINISTRIES (RAM HOUSE)CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $115,313 · OtherCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP …GIRL SCOUTS OF VIRGINIA SKYLINE COUNCIL INC: $105,745 · OtherGIRL SCOUTS OF VIRGINIA SKYLINE COUN…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $105,745 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF ROANOKE VALLEY…SALEM HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA SALEM MUSEUM: $105,745 · OtherSALEM HISTORICAL SOCIETY DBA SALEM M…BLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $46,482 · OtherBLUE RIDGE MOUNTAINS COUNCIL BOY SCO…APPLE RIDGE FARM INC: $24,225 · Other+2 more: $10,950 · OtherROANOKE COLLEGE: $317,234 · EducationROANOKE COLLEGEWest End Center Inc: $109,038 · EducationWest End Center IncHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $105,745 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATIONVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $31,120 · EducationVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COL…Salem Area Ecumenical Ministries: $23,975 · ReligionRenovation Alliance Inc: $4,880 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$805,286Other$672,821Education$563,137Religion$23,975Housing & Shelter$4,880

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER: $333,389 over 9y, 5.5% of budgetROANOKE COLLEGE: $317,234 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $175,806 over 9y, 1.3% of budgetTHE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC: $158,616 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetCHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY: $115,313 over 9y, 1.2% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE: $109,038 over 9y, 3.8% of budgetWest End Center Inc: $109,038 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF VIRGINIA SKYLINE COUNCIL INC: $105,745 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $105,745 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $31,120 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $28,437 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetAPPLE RIDGE FARM INC: $24,225 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetSalem Area Ecumenical Ministries: $23,975 over 5y, 5.7% of budgetBRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ROANOKE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY SERVICE OF ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds THE RESCUE MISSION OF ROANOKE INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILD HEALTH INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP DBA CHIP OF ROANOKE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF GREATER ROANOKE ↗
  • Who funds West End Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF VIRGINIA SKYLINE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA WESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ADULT CARE CENTER OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds APPLE RIDGE FARM INC ↗
  • Who funds Salem Area Ecumenical Ministries ↗
  • Who funds BRADLEY FREE CLINIC OF ROANOKE VALLEY INC ↗
  • Who funds Renovation Alliance Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation Serving Western VirginiaVA32.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation Serving Western Virginia · Robertson Family Foundation Inc · Edgar a Thurman Fdn Children Nect · United Way of Virginia's Blue Ridge Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Muse Family Foundation Co Elizabeth Muse · Carilion Medical Center · Roanoke Womens Foundation · Sam & Marion Golden Helping Hand Foundation · Evelyn F James Foundation · Powell Charitable Foundation · The Newbern Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Helen C Cobbs Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Helen C Cobbs Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Helen C Cobbs Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Helen C Cobbs Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Helen C Cobbs’ filings →

    More from the funding graph