Skip to content
The Health Plan of West Virginia Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

The Health Plan of West Virginia Inc

Established as a community health organization, the health plan delivers a clinically-driven, technology-enhanced, customer-focused platform by developing and implementing products and services that manage and improve the health and well-being of our members.

$533k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$39k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$1.8MHealth$531kRecreation & Sports$259kHuman Services$105kCommunity Improvement$20kArts & Culture$10kPhilanthropy$9kEducation$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 14 grants below total $288,549, the rows itemized in this filing. The $532,522 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $243,973 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.
$20,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$462M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOMENCARE INC DBA FAMILYCARE$38,549
HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER LLC$20,000
ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$20,000
CHRISTIAN HELP INC$20,000
OLD MAN RIVERS MISSION$20,000
CAMPBELLS CREEK CHURCH$20,000
UNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC$20,000
SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC$20,000
ST MATTHEWS EPISCOPAL CHURCH$20,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC$20,000
HUNTINGTON CITY MISSION$20,000
ST JAMES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH$20,000
MOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC$20,000
EASTER SEALS$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $525k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YWCA: $50k → 15%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $40k → 19%GILMER COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $10k → 23%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $40k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $30k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $20k → 19%CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $15k → 19%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $40k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $40k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER LLC: $40k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER LLC: $40k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $30k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER LLC: $30k → 15%YWCA: $25k → 15%YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV INC: $20k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER LLC: $20k → 15%CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $20k → 15%HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER LLC: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.6M · 24 repeat orgs$136k to everyone else

24 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

24
8

Total granted

$2.6M
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+63%

Still filing today

79%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $49k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesEducationRecreation & SportsCommunity ImprovementArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    4× · 2018–2021 · $185k · revenue +16%
  • CH
    CHRISTIAN HELP INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +128%
  • OM
    OLD MAN RIVERS MISSION
    5× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • MH
    MARSHALL HEALTH SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • WH
    Wheeling Hospital Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue +44%
  • NL
    NEW LIFE CLINIC INC
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia University Medical Corporation

To support the West Virginia University School of Medicine in the furtherance of its charitable, scientific, and educational purposes by serving as its faculty practice plan and providing a full range of business management services to its…

Health
2
Valley Health Systems Inc

To provide quality healthcare to all individuals, emphasizing outreach to those who are underserved. valley health strives to ensure that quality healthcare is readily accessible to everyone and serves patients regardless of their ability…

Health
3
Community Care of West Virginia Inc

The mission of ccwv is to help our communities live the healthiest lives possible by meeting their immediate and long-term healthcare needs. this mission is accomplished by providing high quality, accessible, comprehensive, culturally…

—
4
University Healthcare Physicians Inc

Our mission is to improve the health of Eastern Panhandle residents through excellence in health professions education, community service, research, and accessible patient-centered health care.

—
5
Wv Helping Hands
Human Services
6
Webster County Memorial Hospital

The mission of Webster County Memorial Hospital is to provide excellent, high quality care in a compassionate and cost-effective manner.

—
7
West Virginia University Hospitals Inc

WVU Hospitals WVUH exists to provide a quality healthcare system, including tertiary services, to the citizens of WV and the surrounding region. Equally important, WVUH is committed by law and philosophy to be the primary clinical site for…

Health
8
Valley Comprehensive Community Health Center Inc

Valley healthcare system shall improve our community's health by delivering the highest quality behavioral healthcare guided by our consumer's needs.

—
9
Hospice Care Corporation D/B/a West Virginia Caring

To improve care for those facing life-limiting illness through direct support of patients and their families, public education and public advocacy.

—
10
West Virginia Health Improvement Institute Inc

The wvhii is a statewide collaboration among multiple stakeholders focusing on improving the health and health care of the citizens of west virginia.

Health
11
West Virginia Rural Health Association Inc

The west virginia rural health association (wvrha) advocates for empowering all west virginians to advance their quality of life, their well-being, and their access to excellence in rural health care. our mission is to unite people,…

Health
12
West Virginia University Medical Corp Charleston Division Dba Wvupc

The mission of West Virginia University School of Medicine Charleston Division d/b/a West Virginia University Physicians of Charleston, is to support the West Virginia University School of Medicine & Improve the lives of our patients,…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of the Upper Ohio Valley Inc; the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
19/26
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $160,000 · OtherST LUKES EPISCOPAL CHURCHTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $146,000 · OtherTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INCHUNTINGTON CITY MISSION: $145,000 · OtherHUNTINGTON CITY MISSIONST MATTHEWS PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $145,000 · OtherST MATTHEWS PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL CHURCHCAMPBELLS CREEK CHURCH: $145,000 · OtherCAMPBELLS CREEK CHURCHST JAMES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH: $141,500 · OtherST JAMES EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCHUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS INC: $75,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS INC+8 more: $105,000 · Other+8 moreUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesUNION MISSION MINISTRIES IN…CHRISTIAN HELP INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN HELP INCTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $145,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER …CATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $130,000 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIR…YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $95,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSO…+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCAMC FOUNDATION INC: $122,500 · HealthCAMC FOUNDATION INCAmerican Heart Association Inc: $120,000 · HealthAmerican Heart Assoc…RURAL EMERGENCYTRAUMA INSTITUTE INC: $89,971 · HealthRURAL EMERGENCYTRAUM…WOMENCARE INC: $38,549 · HealthWOMENCARE INCWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $30,000 · HealthWHEELING HEALTH RIGH…United Health Foundation Inc: $30,000 · HealthUnited Health Founda…WEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA MEDICA…+2 more: $22,500 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $185,200 · EducationOLD MAN RIVERS MISSION: $145,000 · Housing & ShelterMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $124,994 · Food & NutritionDIABETES CAMP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $50,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,062,500Human Services$670,000Health$483,520Education$185,200Housing & Shelter$145,000Food & Nutrition$124,994Recreation & Sports$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $185,200 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SOUP KITCHEN OF GREATER WHEELING INC: $146,000 over 5y, 4.8% of budgetUNION MISSION MINISTRIES INC: $145,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN HELP INC: $145,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetOLD MAN RIVERS MISSION: $145,000 over 5y, 3.1% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF THE CARPENTER INC: $145,000 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES WEST VIRGINIA INC: $130,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMOUNTAINEER FOOD BANK INC: $124,994 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCAMC FOUNDATION INC: $122,500 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $120,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF WHEELING WV: $95,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetRURAL EMERGENCYTRAUMA INSTITUTE INC: $89,971 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetUNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS & SURGEONS INC: $75,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES CAMP OF WEST VIRGINIA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetWOMENCARE INC: $38,549 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELING HEALTH RIGHT INC: $30,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetUnited Health Foundation Inc: $30,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA MEDICAL FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetDISCOVER THE REAL WEST VIRGINIA FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 6.6% of budgetTHE UNDERPRIVILEGED CHILDREN FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetWheeling Hospital Inc: $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEAL REHABILITATION CENTER INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCLAY CENTER FOR THE ARTS & SCIENCES OF WV INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGILMER CO FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $10,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTHE DOLLYWOOD FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of …Truist West Virginia …Bernard McDonough Fou…Francis J and Edith J…Albert Schenk III & K…Community Foundation …The Greater Kanawha V…American Electric Pow…Pallottine Foundation…Peoples Bank Foundati…Rosemary M Front Char…August J & Thelma S H…
Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV26× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Francis J and Edith Jackson Founda Security National Trust Company · Albert Schenk III & Kathleen H Schenk Charitable Trust · Community Foundation for the Ohio Valley Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Pallottine Foundation of Huntington West Virginia · Peoples Bank Foundation · Rosemary M Front Charitable Trust · August J & Thelma S Hoffmann Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Health Plan of West Virginia Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Health Plan of West Virginia Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Health Plan of West Virginia’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home