Skip to content
The Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

The Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston

The board's mission is providing state of the art health care with integrity, to the people we serve.

$354k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$150k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$210kHealth$172kEducation$25kPhilanthropy$15kPublic Benefit$5kRecreation & Sports$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 4 grants below total $172,850, the rows itemized in this filing. The $354,458 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $181,608 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $11k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $150k
$11,475
Median grant
1
States reached
$185M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST MICHAELS MEDICAL CLINIC INC$150,000
CITY OF OXFORD$11,475
UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA$6,375
EMPTY STOCKING GALA CMTE$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 17%JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $25k → 19%ST MICHAELS MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $150k → 19%St Michaels Medical Clinic Inc: $113k → 19%COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEAL: $10k → 19%CITY OF ANNISTON INC: $5k → 19%UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA: $5k → 19%MEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $15k → 19%FAIRFAX GARDEN MEDIA LLC: $8k → 19%MEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $8k → 19%OXFORD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $23k → 19%OXFORD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $20k → 19%OXFORD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $20k → 19%CITY OF OXFORD: $15k → 19%CITY OF OXFORD: $14k → 19%OXFORD PERFORMING ARTS CENTER: $11k → 19%CITY OF OXFORD: $11k → 19%Oxford Performing Arts Center: $6k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$517k · 4 repeat orgs$77k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +17% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
8

Total granted

$517k
$66k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+17%

Still filing today

75%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $263k · revenue +38%
  • OP
    Oxford Performing Arts Center
    7× · 2018–2025 · $120k
  • AM
    ANNISTON MUSEUM ENDOWMENT CORPORATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue -23% · 48% of their budget

Funded once

  • TJ
    THE JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
  • FG
    FAIRFAX GARDEN MEDIA LLC
    one grant, 2022 · $8k
  • KC
    KNOX CONCERT SERIES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alabama Healthcare Hall of Fame
Arts & Culture
2
Alabama Archives & History Foundation

To raise funds to support the work of the Alabama Department of Archives and History, Alabama's State Archival and Museum agency.

Arts & Culture
3
The Medical Foundation of Alabama

To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects

—
4
Calhoun County Chamber of Commerce Inc

Promotion of the economic development of calhoun county, alabama

—
5
Calhoun County Medical Foundation

Fund medical needs

Health
6
Alabama Broadcasters Association Educational Foundation
Education
7
Shelby County Historical Society

Preserve the history of shelby county al

—
8
Community Foundation of East Alabama Inc

The mission of the community foundation of east alabama is to build and administer endowment funds for philanthropic purposes focusing on identified community needs and strengthening nonprofit organizations.

Philanthropy
9
Alabama Bicentennial Commission Foundation Inc

The foundation's missionis to provide assistance to the alabama bicentennial commission, which supports, created and executes events and activities that commemorate the stories of alabama's people, places and path to statehood.

Arts & Culture
10
Alabama Free Clinic Inc

To provide free medical services and medicine to people unable to afford healthcare.

Health
11
Southeast Alabama Emergency Medical Services Council Inc

Provide emergency medical assistance, training & education for area paramedics, hospitals and local government entities

Health
12
Northeast Alabama Kidney Assoc in

Provide financial assistance to kidney patients for medical needs

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama; the most unlike its peers is Anniston Museum Endowment Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Oxford Performing Arts Center (OPAC): $120,463 · OtherOxford Performing Arts Center (OPAC)ANNISTON MUSEUM ENDOWMENT CORPORATION: $80,000 · OtherANNISTON MUSEUM ENDOWMENT CORPORATIONMEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONINC: $54,000 · OtherMEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONINC+6 more: $37,485 · Other+6 moreST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $262,500 · HealthST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INCTHE JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 · EducationTHE EMPTY STOCKING CORPORATION: $5,000 · EducationCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama: $10,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyNORTHEAST ALABAMA BICYCLE ASSOC: $5,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$291,948Health$262,500Education$30,000Philanthropy$15,000Recreation & Sports$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC: $262,500 over 2y, 20% of budgetANNISTON MUSEUM ENDOWMENT CORPORATION: $80,000 over 3y, 48% of budgetMEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONINC: $54,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetTHE JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Foundation of Northeast Alabama: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKNOX CONCERT SERIES INC: $7,810 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNORTHEAST ALABAMA BICYCLE ASSOC: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation …Alabama Power Foundat…The Daniel Foundation…The Bank of America C…Amazonsmile Foundation
Community Foundation of Northeast AlabamaAL26.3× affinity10 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home