· Public charity
The Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston
The board's mission is providing state of the art health care with integrity, to the people we serve.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 3 grants below total $138,238 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $262,628 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $124,390 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $113k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| St Michaels Medical Clinic Inc | $112,500 |
| Anniston Museum Endowment Corp | $20,000 |
| Oxford Performing Arts Center | $5,738 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 100% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +137% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $113k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- OPOxford Performing Arts Center6× · 2018–2024 · $109k
- AMANNISTON MUSEUM ENDOWMENT CORPORATION3× · 2022–2024 · $80k · revenue -23% · 48% of their budget
- MCMEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONINC6× · 2018–2024 · $54k · revenue +137%
Funded once
- TJTHE JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +17%
- FGFAIRFAX GARDEN MEDIA LLCone grant, 2022 · $8k
- KCKNOX CONCERT SERIES INCone grant, 2019 · $8k · revenue -79%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To raise funds to support the work of the Alabama Department of Archives and History, Alabama's State Archival and Museum agency.
To further the image of medicine through financial support for health education programs and projects
Promotion of the economic development of calhoun county, alabama
Fund medical needs
Preserve the history of shelby county al
The mission of the community foundation of east alabama is to build and administer endowment funds for philanthropic purposes focusing on identified community needs and strengthening nonprofit organizations.
The foundation's missionis to provide assistance to the alabama bicentennial commission, which supports, created and executes events and activities that commemorate the stories of alabama's people, places and path to statehood.
To provide free medical services and medicine to people unable to afford healthcare.
Provide emergency medical assistance, training & education for area paramedics, hospitals and local government entities
Provide financial assistance to kidney patients for medical needs
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama and the most unlike its peers is Anniston Museum Endowment Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 13 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ST MICHAEL'S MEDICAL CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds ANNISTON MUSEUM ENDOWMENT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MEDICAL CENTER MEMORIAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗
- Who funds THE JACKSONVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama ↗
- Who funds KNOX CONCERT SERIES INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
- Who funds EAST CENTRAL ALABAMA UNITED CEREBRAL PALSY INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHEAST ALABAMA BICYCLE ASSOC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northeast Alabama · Alabama Power Foundation Inc · The Daniel Foundation of Alabama · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Health Care Authority of the City of Anniston funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.