Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$100k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2023.

Religion$20MInternational$5.7MHealth$3.2MEducation$2.2MHuman Services$1.1MYouth Development$839kRecreation & Sports$530kHousing & Shelter$495kOther$0
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UPMC CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBU$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–22, $986k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 50% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%HANDS EXTENDED INTERNATIONAL LLC: $20k → 10%TEARFUND: $300k → 8%TEARFUND: $150k → 8%TEARFUND: $40k → 8%HOPE CENTER INC: $151k → 15%HOPE CENTER INC: $125k → 15%HOPE CENTER INC: $97k → 15%HOPE CENTER INC: $66k → 15%HOPE CENTER INC: $23k → 15%HOPE CENTER INC: $15k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
DC
HI
OK
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$31M · 75 repeat orgs$3.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

75 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 75 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

75
34

Total granted

$31M
$3.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+1%

Still filing today

55%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $100k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
ReligionInternationalEducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RC
    Redeemer City To City
    4× · 2019–2022 · $915k · revenue +191%
  • TV
    THE VERITAS FORUM INC
    4× · 2019–2022 · $850k · revenue +65%
  • DA
    Development Assoc International
    4× · 2019–2022 · $815k · revenue +8%

Funded once

  • TS
    The Signatry Corporation Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $250k
  • SC
    SERVANT CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $250k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community

Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…

—
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
International Leadership Institute

The international leadership institute (ili) changes history by accelerating the spread of the gospel through training and mobilizing leaders of leaders to reach their nations. ili accomplishes this purpose through cutting edge leadership…

Religion
5
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
6
Dallas International University

As a christian university, we provide education and research opportunities preparing global leaders to partner with local communities.

Education
7
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
8
Global Media Outreach

Leveraging technology to invite all people to know jesus christ as savior and grow in a personal relationship with him.

Religion
9
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
10
Bibleproject

Bibleproject's mission is to help people experience the bible as a unified story that leads to jesus. this is achieved by creating biblical videos to be regularly released on a newly-created youtube channel. (continued on schedule o.)each…

Religion
11
Visionsynergy

Our mission is to accelerate the great commission by equipping leaders, developing networks, and catalyzing collaboration toward spiritual breakthroughs among the least reached peoples and places of the world.

International
12
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Convoy of Hope; the most unlike its peers is Hands Extended International Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

67 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 67 of the 113 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
63/67
Grantees still filing
43/67
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

LIFE IN ABUNDANCE INTERNATIONAL: $850,000 · OtherLANGHAM PARTNERSHIP USA INC: $750,000 · OtherCHINA PARTNERSHIP: $725,000 · OtherINTERNATIONAL FELLOWSHIP OF EVANGEL: $720,000 · OtherLOGOSDOR: $640,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $600,000 · OtherJOYCORPS: $555,000 · Other+54 more: $11,132,389 · Other+54 moreRedeemer City To City: $915,000 · ReligionRedeemer City To CityTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $850,000 · ReligionTHE VERITAS FORUM INCDevelopment Assoc International: $815,000 · ReligionDevelopment Assoc InternationalAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $800,000 · ReligionAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AF…Josiah Venture: $760,000 · ReligionJosiah VentureOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $665,000 · ReligionOpen Doors With Brother Andrew I…STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC: $606,580 · ReligionSTRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INCAlpha USA: $575,000 · ReligionAlpha USAElam Ministries: $490,000 · ReligionCHRISTIAN HERITAGE USA FOUNDATION: $475,000 · ReligionMISSION EURASIA: $405,000 · ReligionLuis Palau Association: $375,000 · ReligionAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $350,000 · ReligionBLOODWATER MISSION INC: $340,000 · Religion+11 more: $1,747,400 · Religion+11 moreCompassion International Incorporated: $725,000 · InternationalCHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $675,000 · InternationalVIVA NETWORK - NORTH AMERICA: $315,000 · InternationalONE COLLECTIVE: $267,600 · International4D Ministries: $260,000 · InternationalINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $200,000 · International4AFRICA: $195,000 · International+2 more: $80,000 · InternationalSTRATEGIC GLOBAL ASSISTANCE INC: $800,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $650,000 · PhilanthropyNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $478,500 · PhilanthropyHorizons International: $570,000 · Human ServicesTEARFUND USA INC: $490,000 · Human ServicesTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $476,280 · Human Services+1 more: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND: $600,000 · EducationFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $300,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $125,000 · EducationWheaton College: $120,000 · EducationJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $118,390 · EducationVanderbilt University: $100,000 · EducationScholar Leaders International: $100,000 · EducationFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $530,000 · Youth DevelopmentCARE FOR CHILDREN CARE FOR CHILDREN - USA INC: $510,000 · Youth DevelopmentCARING FOR KIDS NETWORK INC: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentYOUNG LIFE: $40,000 · Youth Development
Other$15,972,389Religion$10,168,980International$2,717,600Philanthropy$1,928,500Human Services$1,556,280Education$1,463,390Youth Development$1,180,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRedeemer City To City: $915,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetTHE VERITAS FORUM INC: $850,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetDevelopment Assoc International: $815,000 over 4y, 5.7% of budgetSTRATEGIC GLOBAL ASSISTANCE INC: $800,000 over 4y, 6.5% of budgetAWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES: $800,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetJosiah Venture: $760,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetCompassion International Incorporated: $725,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT: $675,000 over 4y, 7.6% of budgetOpen Doors With Brother Andrew Inc: $665,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTHE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC: $650,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetSTRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC: $606,580 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND: $600,000 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetAlpha USA: $575,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHorizons International: $570,000 over 3y, 5.4% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $530,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCARE FOR CHILDREN CARE FOR CHILDREN - USA INC: $510,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetTEARFUND USA INC: $490,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetElam Ministries: $490,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetNATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC: $478,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOPE CENTER INC: $476,280 over 4y, 12% of budgetCHRISTIAN HERITAGE USA FOUNDATION: $475,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY: $450,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMISSION EURASIA: $405,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetLuis Palau Association: $375,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetAMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY: $350,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBLOODWATER MISSION INC: $340,000 over 2y, 9.0% of budgetChildren of Character Inc: $330,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetVIVA NETWORK - NORTH AMERICA: $315,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetFULLER THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $300,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetENTRUST: $300,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetLIFEWATER INC: $300,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetTHE CULTURE HOUSE INC: $275,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetNEW INDIA EVANGELISTIC ASSOCIATION: $275,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetONE COLLECTIVE: $267,600 over 2y, 1.7% of budget4D Ministries: $260,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetCAMPUS OUTREACH SERVE INC: $250,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetCity Union Mission: $225,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget4AFRICA: $195,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetNEED HIM NATIONAL MEDIA OUTREACH INC: $160,000 over 1y, 11% of budget32 North Media Inc: $150,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMILITARY COMMUNITY YOUTH MINISTRIES: $150,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetHISPANIC MINISTRY CENTER: $150,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Center: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Broad Institute Inc: $125,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWheaton College: $120,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY: $118,390 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Redeemer City To City ↗
  • Who funds THE VERITAS FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds Development Assoc International ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIC GLOBAL ASSISTANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds AWANA CLUBS INTERNATIONAL AND AFFILIATES ↗
  • Who funds Josiah Venture ↗
  • Who funds Compassion International Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds CHALMERS CENTER FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds Open Doors With Brother Andrew Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE GLOBAL ORPHAN PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC ↗
  • Who funds THORNSTON EDUCATIONAL FUND ↗
  • Who funds Alpha USA ↗
  • Who funds Horizons International ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds CARE FOR CHILDREN CARE FOR CHILDREN - USA INC ↗
  • Who funds TEARFUND USA INC ↗
  • Who funds Elam Ministries ↗
  • Who funds NATL CHRISTIAN CHARITABLE FDN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HOPE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTIAN HERITAGE USA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MISSION EURASIA ↗
  • Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BLOODWATER MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children of Character Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Maclellan Foundation IncTN49.5× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Maclellan Foundation Inc · First Fruit Inc · Servant Foundation · International Generosity Foundation Trust · The Signatry Charitable Trust · Christian Community Foundation of Memphis · G II Charities · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Summit Foundation · Henry P & Susan C Crowell Trust · Tyndale House Ministries · Gordon Christian Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 12%
  • The Broad Institute Inc: 19% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University: 12% of income from government
  • Johns Hopkins University: 12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Harry J Lloyd Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 113 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harry J Lloyd’s filings →

More from the funding graph