Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Harold & Blanche Schechter Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$398k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What it funds
0180% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Youth Development$334kReligion$266kInternational$25kArts & Culture$11kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$7kCivil Rights$5kPublic Benefit$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 46 grants below total $185,652, the rows itemized in this filing. The $397,693 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $212,041 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k39 grants · $84k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $102k
$1,800
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Yeshiva Ketana of Passaic$21,800
Lev Teen Center$20,000
FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM$15,000
ONE ISRAEL FUND$15,000
BAIS MEDRASH OF HARBORVIEW$10,000
Teen Lev Center$10,000
FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM$10,000
Gateways$8,350
POSEACH$7,500
Kahal Anshei Emes D'Cedarhurst$7,000
ONE ISRAEL FUND$5,000
BAIS MEDRASH OF HARBORVIEW$5,000
FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM$5,000
YESHIVA KETANA OF WATERBURY$5,000
FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM$5,000
02Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$641k · 15 repeat orgs$97k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
22

Total granted

$641k
$52k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
0%

Still filing today

33%
5%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $45k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’25
ReligionHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyHealthFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM
    3× · 2022–2025 · $110k · revenue +10%
  • YK
    YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC
    3× · 2022–2025 · $64k · revenue +14%
  • OI
    ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD
    3× · 2022–2025 · $25k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • MY
    MESIVTA YESHIVA RABBI CHAIM BERLIN
    one grant, 2023 · $15k
  • IU
    I. U Fund
    one grant, 2022 · $9k
  • FO
    Friends of Bonei Olam
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Friends of Meor Israel

Education and religious activities and research

Education
2
Yeshiva Yismach Moshe

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide funds to needy individuals in the state of israel.

International
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Zocher Chasdai Ovos

Jewish Observance of Shabbos, Chagim, Torah Learning

Religion
5
Yeshivah Beth Israel Tifereth Menachem Foundation

To provide support to jewish religious education in israel and around the world, and provide financial assistance to and on behalf of yeshivah beth israel tifereth menachem.

Education
6
Mishken Chaim Rivnits

Assistance to the indigent

Religion
7
Ezreinu Inc
Health
8
Yeshivat Leluv of Jerusalem Inc

Charitable work to help people in need

—
9
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
10
Zichron Meshilem Feish Inc

Provides finacial assistance to needy individuals and to religious, charitable organizations

—
11
Shaare Mordechai Inc

The organization's primary mission is charitable and religious in nature, supporting judaic and rabbinical education by providing financial assistance to institutions of jewish learning, currently through grants to shaare mordechai in…

Religion
12
Kosherivf Inc

to assist and guide couples through the challenging times of infertility so that they follow what Judaism and Torah says. To help verify Jewish identity among Jews looking to get married.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is One Israel Fund Ltd; the most unlike its peers is Edible Leftovers Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
03the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Teen Lev Center: $254,000 · OtherTeen Lev CenterLEV TEEN CENTER: $80,000 · OtherLEV TEEN CENTERTAG: $24,596 · OtherYFR: $22,750 · OtherYESHIVA KETANA OF WATERBURY: $22,500 · OtherBAIS MEDRASH OF HARBORVIEW: $18,000 · Other+36 more: $96,642 · Other+36 moreFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $110,005 · InternationalFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHO…ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $25,250 · InternationalONE ISRAEL FUND LTDYESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC: $63,800 · ReligionYESHIVA KT…+2 more: $1,700 · ReligionDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $9,250 · Human Services+2 more: $200 · Human ServicesSHUVU RETURN INC: $7,100 · PhilanthropyRESOLVE Incorporated: $1,600 · HealthEDIBLE LEFTOVERS INC: $430 · Food & Nutrition
Other$518,488International$135,255Religion$65,500Human Services$9,450Philanthropy$7,100Health$1,600Food & Nutrition$430

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM: $110,005 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetONE ISRAEL FUND LTD: $25,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $9,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHUVU RETURN INC: $7,100 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetRESOLVE Incorporated: $1,600 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEDIBLE LEFTOVERS INC: $430 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA Torah Infertilty Medium Exchange: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BIKUR CHOLIM EZRAT ACHIM ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA KTANA OF PASSAIC ↗
  • Who funds ONE ISRAEL FUND LTD ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SHUVU RETURN INC ↗
  • Who funds RESOLVE Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds MAYRIM INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF FAR ROCKAWAY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY20.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · The Ganger Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Harold & Blanche Schechter Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Harold & Blanche Schechter Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harold & Blanche Schechter’s filings →

More from the funding graph