Skip to content

· Public charity

The Harbus Foundation

Support projects and awarding grants and scholarships to programs involved in journalism, literacy and educational activities surrounding the harvard business school.

$60k
Granted FY2019
3
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2019.

Education$90kYouth Development$40kArts & Culture$40k
02FY2019 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$20,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RAISING A READER$20,000
ENROOT INC$20,000
NEW ENGLAND CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIV$20,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $20k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ENROOT INC: $20k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Reading Partners

To ensure that every student can become a confident, independent, and lifelong reader by partnering with schools and communities to provide personalized, evidence-based literacy support and individualized instruction. the organization…

Education
2
Read to Them Inc

We use the power of reading aloud together to build connections across families, schools, and communities to cultivate students learning and success.

Education
3
Literacy Together

Literacy Together transforms lives and communities through the power of literacy. Trained volunteers provide free tutoring to support youth and adults and help them achieve their educational goals, from basic literacy and English language…

—
4
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
5
Read Alliance Inc

Read alliance, inc (read alliance) works to accelerate the educational trajectory of early elementary students through the power of teens who provide one-to-one literacy tutoring in under-resourced communities. read impacts two populations…

Education
6
Teach Western Mass Inc

The goal and vision of teach western mass, inc. is to attract, hire, develop, and retain quality teachers for western massachuseets urban classrooms.

Education
7
Commonlit Inc

To make high-quality literacy materials accessible to teachers and the general public for the advancement of education.

Education
8
Team Read

Year-round, one-to-one tutoring program provided at Title 1 schools to students not at grade-level proficiency in reading. Tutors are area teens recruited and trained to deliver reading support.

Education
9
Curious Learning a Global Literacy Project Inc

To provide access for everyone who wants to learn how to read to have an opportunity to do so

Education
10
Litworld International Inc

Strengthening kids and communities through the power of stories.

International
11
Writers in the Schools

The mission of Writers in the Schools (WITS) is to connect children and youth with professional writers and spoken word artists to unlock the joy and power of storytelling and creative expression.

Education
12
The History Co-Lab Inc

Creating impactful learning for all learners in support of youth thriving

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Empower Schools Inc; the most unlike its peers is Wgbh Educational Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
9/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GENERATION TEACH INC: $20,000 · EducationGENERATION TEACH INCRaising A Reader: $20,000 · EducationRaising A ReaderEMPOWER SCHOOLS INC: $20,000 · EducationEMPOWER SCHOOLS INCWriteBoston Inc: $10,000 · EducationWriteBoston IncTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $20,000 · EmploymentTHE GROUNDTRU…LITERATIONS CORP: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentLITERATIONS C…WGBH Educational Foundation: $20,000 · Arts & CultureWGBH Educatio…MORE THAN WORDS INC: $20,000 · OtherMORE THAN WOR…ENROOT INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesENROOT INC
Education$70,000Employment$20,000Youth Development$20,000Arts & Culture$20,000Other$20,000Human Services$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE GROUNDTRUTH PROJECT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetLITERATIONS CORP: $20,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGENERATION TEACH INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetWGBH Educational Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetENROOT INC: $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetRaising A Reader: $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetEMPOWER SCHOOLS INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetWriteBoston Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wellington Management FoundationMA13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wellington Management Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Harbus Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Harbus Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Generation Teach Inc: 42% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Wgbh Educational Foundation: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2020) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Harbus’ filings →

More from the funding graph