· Private foundation
The Halstatt Charitable Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $175k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC | $100,000 |
| TRINITY BY THE COVE EPISCOPAL CHURCH | $75,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC | $20,000 |
| NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC | $15,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOSPITAL INC | $10,000 |
| FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA | $5,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC | $5,000 |
| RUSTICUS GARDEN CLUB INC | $4,500 |
| NAPLES ZOO INC | $3,000 |
| GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC | $2,500 |
| BEDFORD HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC | $2,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME DU LAC | $2,000 |
| GIGIS PLAYHOUSE INC - SUGAR LAND LLC | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $255k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +32% for the ones you funded once.
22 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $97k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- GCGuadalupe Center Inc2× · 2017–2019 · $235k · revenue +145%
- NBNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC2× · 2023–2024 · $130k · revenue +19%
COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC5× · 2017–2022 · $50k · revenue +53%
Funded once
- ANAMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - FLORIDA GULF COAST Tone grant, 2022 · $13k
REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +98%- CHCHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
North shore health system medical faculty group practice (the corporation) functions as an extension of the northwell health hospitals by bringing medical care to community settings, providing care to medicare, medicaid, and other…
Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marsh Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 59 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Guadalupe Center Inc ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds The Rippowam Cisqua School Inc ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA GULF COAST UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds COLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST FLORIDA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RUSTICUS GARDEN CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds Merrie-Woode Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HEALTH CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE PROTESTANT EPISCOPAL HIGH SCHOOL IN VIRGINIA ↗
- Who funds DAVID LAWRENCE MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds SUFFIELD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds CAPTAINS FOR CLEAN WATER INC ↗
- Who funds LAKE PARK PARENT TEACHER ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF DENVER ↗
- Who funds NAMI Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds ST MATTHEWS HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH POINT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BETTER TOGETHER STRENGTHENING FAMILES INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds COLLIER COUNTY CHILD ADVOCACY COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds BEDFORD PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SILVER HILL HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES ZOO INC ↗
- Who funds ASAPROSAR DEVELOPMENT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds AFRICA FOUNDATION (USA) ↗
- Who funds GRACE PLACE FOR CHILDREN AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds MADOO CONSERVANCY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Collier Community Foundation Inc · Naples Children Foundation Inc · The League Club Inc · The Santomero Family Foundation Inc Co Denise C R Santomero · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Lanbro Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Joyce Charitable Fund · United Way of Collier and the Keys Inc · Carol B Phelon Foundation · The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Halstatt Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Southwest Florida Community Foundation Inc — 69% of income from government
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- David Lawrence Mental Health Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Youth Haven Inc — 0% of income from government
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Silver Hill Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.