Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Hallock Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$154k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$153k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

100% of The Hallock Family Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

5
17
4
18
8
19
9
20
3
21
4
22
5
23
2
24
0
25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Philanthropy$5.9MInternational$53kEducation$47kArts & Culture$45kReligion$38kHealth$37kHousing & Shelter$30kHuman Services$19kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $300
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $153k
$153,309
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VANGUARD CHARITABLE$153,309
VANGUARD CHARITABLE$300
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $39k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%WHEELING FORWARD: $5k → 20%WIND ON WHEELS: $3k → 28%WHEELING FORWARD: $1k → 20%SARASOTA FAMILY YMCA: $10k → 9%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $3k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%STEP UP ON SECOND: $5k → 14%CHILDRENS INSTITUTE: $2k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$192k · 12 repeat orgs$108k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$192k
$105k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+46%

Still filing today

58%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthInternationalEnvironmentPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PF
    PASSION FOR HAITI FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2023 · $53k · revenue +98% · 26% of their budget
  • SU
    STEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC
    3× · 2019–2022 · $15k · revenue +211%
  • TR
    THE RIVIERA TENNIS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • SS
    SHORECREST SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
  • PP
    PALACE PERFORMING ARTS
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
  • SAFE CHILDREN COALITION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue +36%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Francisco Food Bank

To end hunger in san francisco and marin counties by soliciting food donations nationally, distributing this food to qualifying public service agencies and neighborhood pantries, advocating for improved government food programs, and…

2
Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County

Catholic charities of santa clara county serves and advocates for families and individuals in need, especially those living in poverty. rooted in gospel values, we work to create a more just and compassionate community in which people of…

Human Services
3
Community Research Foundation Inc

Crf, in partnership with our clients and stakeholders, designs, delivers and evaluates innovative and exemplary behavioral health and social services in a manner that is both culturally and trauma competent, providing these services with…

Unclassified
4
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
5
The Graduate Center Foundation Inc

The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…

6
Southern California University of Health Sciences

The mission of southern california university of health sciences (scu) is to educate students as competent, caring and successful practitioners of integrative healthcare. the university is committed to providing excellence in academics,…

Education
7
Foundation for California Community Colleges

The foundation's mission is to benefit, support, and enhance the missions of the california community college system.

Education
8
California Healthcare Foundation

Chcf is dedicated to advancing meaningful, measurable improvements in the way the health care delivery system provides care to the people of california, particularly those with low incomes and those whose needs are not well served by the…

9
College Match

College match partners with high schools in los angeles county to identify high-achieving, low-income high school students and provide them with the necessary tools and guidance to get into top-ranked colleges with significant financial…

Education
10
The Community Foundation of Sarasota Co Inc

Community impact powered by philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
10000 Degrees

10,000 degrees is a leading college success nonprofit in the san francisco bay area. we help students from low-income backgrounds gain access to and complete higher education to positively impact their communities and the world.…

Education
12
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saint John's Health Center Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Passion for Haiti Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
13/20
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $5,889,565 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM+2 more — $10,000 · PhilanthropyFIFTH AVENUE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $35,700 · OtherSHORECREST SCHOOL — $20,000 · OtherPALACE PERFORMING ARTS — $20,000 · OtherBRENTWOOD ARTS CENTER — $15,000 · OtherWEST COAST CARE — $13,500 · OtherHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC — $10,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF BRENTWOOD ART CENTER — $10,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $7,500 · OtherBootstraps Inc — $7,000 · Other+10 more — $27,620 · OtherPASSION FOR HAITI FOUNDATION INC — $53,000 · InternationalSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC — $15,000 · Human ServicesSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesWHEELING FORWARD INC — $6,000 · Human ServicesWINE ON WHEELS INC — $3,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $2,500 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $2,000 · Human ServicesVSC FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · EducationSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $15,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 · HealthThe Rand Corporation — $5,000 · Public Benefit
Philanthropy$5,899,565Other$166,320International$53,000Human Services$38,500Education$20,000Health$17,000Public Benefit$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $5,889,565 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetPASSION FOR HAITI FOUNDATION INC — $53,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetVSC FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 over 2y, 9.7% of budgetSTEP UP ON SECOND STREET INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT JOHN'S HEALTH CENTER FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSAFE CHILDREN COALITION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNGER FREE AMERICA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBootstraps Inc — $7,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetWHEELING FORWARD INC — $6,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Rand Corporation — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWINE ON WHEELS INC — $3,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetTHE RIVIERA TENNIS FOUNDATION — $3,000 over 2y, 5.6% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF SARASOTA INC — $1,620 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA8.8× affinity7 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Hallock Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%2%6%14%25%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Safe Children Coalition Inc0% of income from government
  • The Marie Selby Botanical Gardens Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Hallock Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Hallock Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph