Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Hackborn Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$83kEducation$66kFood & Nutrition$46kEnvironment$39kHuman Services$23kEmployment$21kHousing & Shelter$21kHealth$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$887k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE IDAHO FOODBANK$5,000
BodyVox Dance Center$5,000
THE BLACK OREGON LAND TRUST$3,500
Ballet Idaho$3,000
California State Polytechnic Univer$3,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE$2,500
Individual grant recipient$2,500
Neighborhood Works Boise$2,500
THE PEREGRINE FUND$2,000
NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND$2,000
PORTLAND CHILD ART STUDIO$2,000
Life's Kitchen$2,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
COMM CTR RSRC FOR GAY LESBIAN PEOPL$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 43% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 9%PROJECT FLUX: $3k → 8%California State Polytechnic Univer: $3k → 12%CATLIN GABEL: $3k → 8%BodyVox Dance Center: $5k → 12%NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $3k → 15%California State Polytechnic Univer: $3k → 12%BodyVox Dance Center: $4k → 12%Ballet Idaho: $10k → 8%California State Polytechnic Univer: $3k → 12%BodyVox Dance Center: $3k → 12%Ballet Idaho: $5k → 8%California State Polytechnic Univer: $3k → 12%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Boise Rescue Mission: $3k → 8%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Boise Rescue Mission: $3k → 8%Ballet Idaho: $3k → 8%Boise Philharmonic Association: $3k → 8%Boise Rescue Mission: $3k → 8%WASSMUTH CENTER: $3k → 8%Boise Rescue Mission: $3k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND REGIO: $7k → 12%Boise Philharmonic Association: $3k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND REGIO: $5k → 12%Boise Rescue Mission: $3k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND REGIO: $4k → 12%Boise Rescue Mission: $3k → 8%HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND REGIO: $3k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT INSTITUTE: $4k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%OHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $3k → 12%THE BLACK OREGON LAND TRUST: $4k → 12%Neighborhood Works Boise: $4k → 8%Neighborhood Works Boise: $3k → 8%Neighborhood Works Boise: $3k → 8%Neighborhood Works Boise: $3k → 8%THE IDAHO FOODBANK: $5k → 8%Peregrine Fund: $5k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 5% of The Hackborn Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 66% of the giving stays in ID; by stated purpose, 63%.

The Hackborn Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.4% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$382k · 29 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +42% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
7

Total granted

$382k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+42%
+8%

Still filing today

55%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEducationFood & NutritionHousing & ShelterInternationalReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IF
    IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $50k · revenue +48%
  • BI
    BALLET IDAHO INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $35k · revenue +62%
  • TP
    THE PEREGRINE FUND INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $20k · revenue +122%

Funded once

  • WC
    WASSMUTH CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $3k
  • PF
    PROJECT FLUX
    one grant, 2024 · $3k
  • BS
    Boise State University Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $2k · revenue +182%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho Forest Restoration Partnership
Environment
2
Oregon Websites and Watershed Project Inc

Develop educational network to communicate historical and scientific information empasizing natural and cultural resources to pacific northwest.

Environment
3
Northwest Environmental Defense Center

Nedc's mission is to work toward a future in which the pacific northwest leads the nation in developing, implementing & enforcing strong laws and regulations that protect the environment & human health, and where our governments &…

—
4
Department of Bioregion

The Department of Bioregion's mission is a "world of interconnected bioregions and bioregional movements". It does this by creating departments of bioregions around the world and, providing administrative support to bioregional organizing…

Environment
5
Portland State University Foundation

Portland state university foundation is responsible for raising and managing private resources to advance psu's priorities and mission to be a leading urban university.

—
6
Oregon Research Institute

Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…

Social Science
7
Willapa Bay AiR
Arts & Culture
8
Oregon Tilth Inc

Oregon tilth is a leading nonprofit certifier, educator and advocate for sustainable organic agriculture and products since 1974. the organizations mission to make the food system and agriculture biologically sound and socially equitable…

—
9
Iaf Northwest

In 2024, IAF Pacific continued its work of connecting and strengthening broad-based alliances throughout the Pacific region.Through its Building Partnerships for Collaborative Action initiativethe organization supported Indigenous and…

Community Improvement
10
Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund

Oregon Wild works to protect and restore Oregon's wildlands, wildlife and waters as an enduring legacy for future generations.

Environment
11
350PDX

Building a diverse grassroots movement to address the causes of climate disruption through justice-based solutions by inspiring, training and mobilizing people to act.

Environment
12
Portland Fruit Tree Project

To increase equitable access to healthful food and strengthen communities by empowering neighbors to share in the harvest and care of city-grown produce.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Discovery Center of Idaho Inc; the most unlike its peers is St Alphonsus Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
22/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Neighborhood Works Boise: $23,500 · OtherNeighborhood Works BoiseIndividual grant recipient: $22,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTE: $20,500 · OtherOHSU KNIGHT CANCER INSTITUTETHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $20,000 · OtherTHE PEREGRINE FUND INCBodyVox Dance Center: $19,000 · OtherBodyVox Dance CenterCalifornia State Polytechnic Univer: $17,000 · OtherCalifornia State Polytechnic UniverTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $16,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCYBOISE RESCUE MISSION: $15,000 · OtherBOISE RESCUE MISSIONLEARNING LAB INC: $14,000 · OtherLEARNING LAB INCOHSU KNIGHT INSTITUTE: $10,500 · Other+12 more: $39,500 · Other+12 moreBALLET IDAHO INC: $34,500 · Arts & CultureBALLET IDAHO INCTHE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureTHE DISCOVERY CENTE…IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $13,500 · Arts & CultureIDAHO SHAKESPEARE F…BOISE PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $6,500 · Arts & CultureBOISE PHILHARMONIC …+2 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $50,000 · Food & NutritionIDAHO FOODBANK …BLACK OREGON LAND TRUST: $3,500 · Food & NutritionBLACK OREGON LA…KINDNESS FARM: $2,500 · Food & NutritionLIFES KITCHEN INC: $18,000 · EducationOregon State University Foundation: $9,000 · EducationBoise State University Foundation Inc: $2,000 · EducationWOODHAVEN SCHOOL: $2,000 · EducationHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $18,500 · Housing & ShelterPEAR: $2,000 · Housing & ShelterST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · ReligionNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $7,000 · EnvironmentMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3,500 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 · International
Other$217,500Arts & Culture$72,500Food & Nutrition$56,000Education$31,000Housing & Shelter$20,500Religion$10,000Environment$7,000International$6,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE: $50,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetBALLET IDAHO INC: $34,500 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE PEREGRINE FUND INC: $20,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST: $18,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLIFES KITCHEN INC: $18,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $16,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC: $15,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLEARNING LAB INC: $14,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetIDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC: $13,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetOregon State University Foundation: $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND: $7,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBOISE PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC: $6,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWomens Foundation of Oregon: $2,500 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKINDNESS FARM: $2,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPEAR: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBoise State University Foundation Inc: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPORTLAND CHILD ART STUDIO: $2,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWOODHAVEN SCHOOL: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetNorthwest Documentary Arts & Media: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IDAHO FOODBANK WAREHOUSE ↗
  • Who funds BALLET IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds THE PEREGRINE FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY PORTLAND METRO EAST ↗
  • Who funds LIFES KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds THE DISCOVERY CENTER OF IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds LEARNING LAB INC ↗
  • Who funds IDAHO SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Oregon State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds NORTHWEST ABORTION ACCESS FUND ↗
  • Who funds BOISE PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MILLS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST CHILDREN'S ALLIANCE ↗
  • Who funds BLACK OREGON LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds Womens Foundation of Oregon ↗
  • Who funds KINDNESS FARM ↗
  • Who funds PEAR ↗
  • Who funds Boise State University Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PORTLAND CHILD ART STUDIO ↗
  • Who funds WOODHAVEN SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Documentary Arts & Media ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Idaho Power Foundation IncID19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Idaho Power Foundation Inc · Simplot Company Foundation Inc · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · M J Murdock Charitable Trust · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Langan Barber Foundation · Harad Family Foundation · The Julius C Jeker Foundation Inc · Claude R & Ethel B Whittenberger Foundation · The Autzen Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Hackborn Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Hackborn Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Habitat for Humanity Portland Metro East: 14% of income from government
  • Pear: 1% of income from government
  • Womens Foundation of Oregon: 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 41 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Hackborn’s filings →

More from the funding graph