Skip to content
The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$8.3M
Granted FY2024still arriving
55
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$40MEducation$4.8MHuman Services$2.9MYouth Development$1.6MArts & Culture$1.1MPhilanthropy$925kScience & Tech$550kRecreation & Sports$525kOther$0
02FY2024 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k20 grants · $442k
  • $50k–250k18 grants · $1.6M
  • $250k+14 grants · $6.2M
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$188M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
YMCA of Greater Tulsa$750,000
Tulsa Library Trust$737,013
St John's Medical Center$527,387
Atlas Preparatory School$500,000
The Childern's Center Inc$500,000
Humble Sons Bike Company$500,000
University of Tulsa$491,007
Salk Institute for Biological$400,000
United States Air Force Academy End$393,142
Golden Eagle Club$333,219
A New Leaf$300,000
Bishop Kelley High School$300,000
Cheyenne Mountain Zoological Societ$251,003
Young Life$250,000
Colorado Springs Schools$244,332
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $2.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Neighbors Along the Line: $50k → 14%Happy Hands Education Center: $25k → 15%Hospitality House of Tulsa: $25k → 15%Tulsa Boys' Home: $25k → 15%COS I love You: $10k → 9%Cheyenne Village: $25k → 9%Cheyenne Village: $25k → 9%Resonance Center for Women Inc: $25k → 15%Emergency Infant Services: $25k → 15%Emergency Infant Services: $25k → 15%Victory Service Dogs: $15k → 9%Oklahoma Caring Foundation: $15k → 15%Tri Lakes Cares: $25k → 9%Modus Inc: $10k → 15%Silver Key Senior Services: $50k → 9%Clarehouse Inc: $25k → 15%Crosstown Learning Center: $65k → 15%YMCA of Greater Tulsa: $750k → 15%YMCA of Greater Tulsa: $750k → 15%YMCA of Greater Tulsa: $200k → 15%Life Senior Services: $250k → 15%Stand in the Gap Inc: $50k → 15%Assistance League of Tulsa: $10k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$44M · 14 repeat orgs$9.6M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +11% since the first grant, against +1% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
62

Total granted

$44M
$4.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+1%

Still filing today

79%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 37% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.0M · revenue +13%
  • YL
    YOUNG LIFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $925k · revenue +13%
  • TS
    The Salk Institute for Biological Studies
    2× · 2023–2024 · $525k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GILCREASE MUSEUM MANAGEMENT TRUST
    one grant, 2023 · $600k · revenue -50%
  • OS
    Oklahoma State University Foundatio
    one grant, 2023 · $500k
  • GE
    Gloden Eagle Club
    one grant, 2023 · $333k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

—
2
Tulsa Area United Way

The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.

—
3
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
4
Tulsa Zoo Management Inc

Connecting, caring, advocating for wildlife, people, and wild places.

Animals
5
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter
6
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
7
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
8
Indian Health Care Resource Center Inc

To empower the american indian through exceptional healthcare.

Health
9
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
10
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
11
Shelterwell Inc

Shelterwell fosters a spirit of connected community, centered on the belief that housing is a human right.

Housing & Shelter
12
Goodwill Industries of Central Oklahoma Inc

We help people overcome challenges to employment.

Employment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hospice of Green Country Inc; the most unlike its peers is Frontier Media Group. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

75 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 75 of the 117 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
75/75
Grantees still filing
38/75
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

See Line 3a Attachment: $37,890,194 · OtherSee Line 3a Attachment+63 more: $6,404,029 · Other+63 moreThe University of Tulsa: $1,000,000 · EducationTulsa Library Trust: $737,013 · EducationAtlas Preparatory School Inc: $525,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL: $250,000 · EducationColorado Springs Christian Schools: $105,668 · Education+4 more: $155,000 · EducationTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $1,700,000 · Human ServicesLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $250,000 · Human Services+18 more: $545,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG LIFE: $925,000 · Youth DevelopmentHUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY: $500,000 · Youth Development+2 more: $23,000 · Youth DevelopmentSt John Medical Center Inc: $542,425 · HealthThe Children's Center Inc: $500,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $134,031 · Health+3 more: $95,000 · HealthTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 · PhilanthropyPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · PhilanthropyGAZETTE CHARITIES: $150,000 · PhilanthropyRIVER PARKS FOUNDATION: $125,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GILCREASE MUSEUM MANAGEMENT TRUST: $600,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $200,000 · Arts & CultureGOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $75,000 · Arts & CultureOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $40,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $105,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$44,294,223Education$2,772,681Human Services$2,495,000Youth Development$1,448,000Health$1,271,456Philanthropy$1,050,000Arts & Culture$1,020,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER TULSA: $1,700,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetThe University of Tulsa: $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUNG LIFE: $925,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Library Trust: $737,013 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetTHE GILCREASE MUSEUM MANAGEMENT TRUST: $600,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetSt John Medical Center Inc: $542,425 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Salk Institute for Biological Studies: $525,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAtlas Preparatory School Inc: $525,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetHUMBLE SONS BIKE COMPANY: $500,000 over 1y, 8.7% of budgetThe Children's Center Inc: $500,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $500,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network: $325,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetA NEW LEAF INC: $300,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCHEYENNE MOUNTAIN ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $251,003 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetPIKES PEAK COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE COLORADO SPRINGS SCHOOL: $250,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $250,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC: $200,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetWILLIAM J PALMER PARKS FOUNDATION INC: $150,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetGAZETTE CHARITIES: $150,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $134,031 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRIVER PARKS FOUNDATION: $125,000 over 1y, 5.5% of budgetColorado Springs Christian Schools: $105,668 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetColorado Springs Youth Sports Complex Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 9.9% of budgetNEWVIEW OKLAHOMA INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetGOLF HISTORY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION: $75,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF TULSA INC: $75,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCROSSTOWN LEARNING CENTER INC: $65,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetRonald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa: $60,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC: $60,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetJENKS PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 8.3% of budgetSHIELD 616 INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetEmergency Infant Services Inc: $50,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCheyenne Village: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE: $50,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetSILVER KEY SENIOR SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTREET SCHOOL INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetSTAND IN THE GAP INC: $50,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budgetTHE PARENT CHILD CTR OF TULSA INC: $50,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC: $40,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetCAMP FIRE GREEN COUNTRY INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA ARTS INSTITUTE INC: $40,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTown Hall of Tulsa Corp: $30,000 over 1y, 6.2% of budgetCrisis Pregnancy Outreach Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 9.8% of budgetTulsa Regional STEM Alliance Inc: $30,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCOLORADO SPRINGS CONSERVATORY FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetResonance Center for Women Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTULSA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Anne and Henry Za…Mervin Bovaird Founda…The Gelvin FoundationThe Hardesty Family F…Grace & Franklin Bern…George Kaiser Family …Tulsa Community Found…El and Thelma Gaylord…Ralph and Frances McG…The Sharna and Irvin …Oneok Foundation IncOne Gas Foundation Inc
The Anne and Henry Zarrow FoundationOK78.9× affinity37 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation · Tulsa Community Foundation · El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 260%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc: 45% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation: 11% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa: 5% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Arts Institute Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Gardens Incorporated: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
26get no government money at all
27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The HA & Mary K Chapman Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 117 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on HA & Mary K Chapman’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home