Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Guttmann Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$2k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$45kHealth$27kHuman Services$9kCommunity Improvement$9kCrime & Legal$2kFood & Nutrition$860Arts & Culture$180Philanthropy$180Other$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
2
States reached
$156k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE$1,850
VARIOUS$918
CONG KETER TORAH$720
PROJECT EZRA$500
Individual grant recipient$480
Individual grant recipient$400
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LEAH$360
Individual grant recipient$60
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 92% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $3k → 16%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $2k → 16%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $2k → 16%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $2k → 16%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $500 → 16%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $500 → 16%THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE: $500 → 16%TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $500 → 7%TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $360 → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$96k · 16 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +32% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
7

Total granted

$96k
$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+32%

Still filing today

31%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $360 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyReligionFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SI
    Sharsheret Inc
    3× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +117%
  • TF
    THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $10k · revenue +38%
  • TS
    TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $860 · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $500
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $250
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC
    one grant, 2023 · $180 · revenue +6%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
American Friends of Yeshiva Aish Hatorah
—
3
Sherit Isroel
—
4
Keren Yaakov Ben Menachen Tzvi Foundation
Philanthropy
5
American Friends of Amshinover Yeshiva Jerusalem Inc

Support of religious schools in Israel

International
6
Hahaim Yeshivat Shalom Inc
Education
7
Shaarei Halacha Inc
Philanthropy
8
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
9
American Friends of Even Yisroel Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Yismach Moshe Inc

Providing food, clothing, shoes and other light necessities for widows, orphans and needy families throughout israel.

Philanthropy
11
Yad Yosef Foundation
Philanthropy
12
Tzemach Yifroch Foundation
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is American Friends of Yeshivat Hesder Sderotinc; the most unlike its peers is The Friendship Circle Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
9/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CONG KETER TORAH: $29,431 · OtherCONG KETER TORAHVARIOUS: $9,718 · OtherVARIOUSIndividual grant recipient: $4,135 · OtherIndividual grant recipientKETER TORAH CHARITY FUND: $3,754 · OtherKETER TORAH CHARITY FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $2,960 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,275 · OtherPROJECT EZRA: $2,150 · Other+8 more: $4,320 · Other+8 moreSharsheret Inc: $26,180 · HealthSharsheret Inc+1 more: $540 · HealthTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $10,200 · Human ServicesTHE FRIENDSH…TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $860 · Human ServicesTOMCHEI SHAB…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LEAH INC: $360 · InternationalJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $118 · InternationalSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $200 · Food & NutritionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $180 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $180 · Arts & CultureYESHIVA OF MIAMI INC: $54 · Religion
Other$58,743Health$26,720Human Services$11,060International$478Food & Nutrition$200Philanthropy$180Arts & Culture$180Religion$54

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSharsheret Inc: $26,180 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC: $10,200 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetTOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY: $860 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT YECHI INC: $540 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LEAH INC: $360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $118 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVA OF MIAMI INC: $54 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Sharsheret Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FRIENDSHIP CIRCLE INC ↗
  • Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT YECHI INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YAD LEAH INC ↗
  • Who funds SHARE OF NEW SQUARE INC DBA CHESED 247 ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF YESHIVAT HESDER SDEROTINC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA OF MIAMI INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Fjc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Guttmann Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Guttmann Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Sharsheret Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Guttmann Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Guttmann Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Guttmann Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph