Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gustavel Wynn Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$41kEducation$30kHuman Services$19kYouth Development$10kAnimals$8kReligion$3kCrime & Legal$2kPhilanthropy$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$471k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNI FOUNDATIO$5,000
SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO FOUNDATION$1,364
COMPANIONS ANIMAL CENTER$1,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$1,000
BOYS GIRLS CLUB OF KOOTENAI COUNTY$1,000
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$1,000
MCCOIX'S MISSION$1,000
KOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION$1,000
PURSUIT OF EXCELLENCE FOUNDATION$1,000
SENIOR CLASS OF CDA HIGHSCHOOL INC$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–23, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%Children's Village: $3k → 10%The Children's Village: $2k → 10%Children's Village: $2k → 10%Children's Village: $2k → 10%Children's Village: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
ID
IL
MI
NY
OR
IA
CA
MD
KS
TN
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$102k · 20 repeat orgs$17k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +14% since the first grant, against +11% for those funded once.

20 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
14

Total granted

$102k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+11%

Still filing today

50%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CV
    CANOPY VILLAGE INC
    5× · 2019–2023 · $10k · revenue +115%
  • UO
    University of Idaho Foundation Inc
    8× · 2018–2025 · $9k · revenue +7%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $7k · revenue +99%

Funded once

  • SA
    ST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
  • FA
    Family Advocates CASA Program
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • CM
    Chrildrens Miracle Network Hospital
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Idaho State University Foundation Inc

The mission of the Foundation is to stimulate voluntary private support from alumni, parents, friends, corporations, foundations, and others for the benefit of the University and its students.

Education
2
Idaho Medical Association Foundation Inc
Health
3
Kootenai Health Inc

We improve health one patient at a time in a friendly and professional culture committed to superior quality and safety.

Health
4
Skagit Hospice Foundation

To fund the program and services of hospice of the nothwest to ensure dignified and compassionate care is available to anyone coping with a life-limiting diagnosis.one size doesn't always fit all, especially when it comes to quality of…

Health
5
Idaho Health Care Association Inc

The idaho health care association, inc. is a member driven association whose mission is to provide the unified voice for the betterment of the idaho nursing home and assisted living care professionals and the residents they serve.

—
6
Idaho Community Foundation Inc

The idaho community foundation strengthens communities through philanthropy, elevating nonprofit impact, and connecting idahoans to create a place where everyone can contribute to thriving communities.

Philanthropy
7
Iowa City Hospice Inc

To provide high-quality and compassionate care to community members approaching the end of life.

Human Services
8
International Development Enterprises

See schedule o for a more detailed description of ide's mission statement and achievements.

International
9
Kanawha Hospice Care Inc

To affirm life by committing to enhance the lives of the dying and their families by recognizing the dignity and uniqueness of individuals and by responding to the changing needs of our communities.

Human Services
10
Clearwater Valley Hospital and Clinics Inc

We improve healthcare one patient at a time in a friendly and professional culture committed to superior quality and safety.

Health
11
Iowa State University Foundation

Aligning donor passion and generosity to advance iowa state university's land grant ideals.

Education
12
Idaho Health Data Exchange Inc

IHDE exists to create and maintain a collaborative statewide effort to improve the coordination and quality of healthcare through the use of a health information exchange and health information technology.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Idaho; the most unlike its peers is Kootenai Humane Society Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 38 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
11/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Boys Girls Club of Kootenai County: $9,500 · OtherBoys Girls Club of Kootenai CountyKOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATION: $7,200 · OtherKOOTENAI HEALTH FOUNDATIONSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN: $7,000 · OtherSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDRENOREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNI FOUNDATIO: $6,000 · OtherOREGON HEALTH SCIENCE UNI FOUNDATIOMCCOIXS MISSION: $6,000 · OtherMCCOIXS MISSIONCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $4,300 · OtherCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATIONHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $4,200 · OtherHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INCMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IDAHO: $4,000 · OtherMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IDAHOCity of Hope: $3,100 · OtherCompanions Animal center: $3,000 · OtherPEO Foundation Chapter AV-ID: $2,500 · Other+14 more: $13,500 · Other+14 moreUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc: $9,045 · EducationUniversity of Idaho…NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 · EducationNORTH IDAHO COLLEGE…EXCEL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 · EducationEXCEL FOUNDATION IN…+1 more: $500 · EducationCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesCANOPY VILL…WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WAR…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · HealthKOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4,200 · AnimalsSpokane Humane Society: $1,000 · AnimalsST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 · ReligionNEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $1,000 · Public Benefit
Other$70,300Education$20,545Human Services$12,000Health$9,000Animals$5,200Religion$1,000Public Benefit$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCANOPY VILLAGE INC: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetUniversity of Idaho Foundation Inc: $9,045 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $8,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $7,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC: $4,200 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IDAHO: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetEXCEL FOUNDATION INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $1,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLUTHERHAVEN MINISTRIES INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpokane Humane Society: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CANOPY VILLAGE INC ↗
  • Who funds University of Idaho Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTH IDAHO COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds KOOTENAI HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF IDAHO ↗
  • Who funds EXCEL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds ST ALPHONSUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWBY-GINNINGS OF NORTH IDAHO INC ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERHAVEN MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Spokane Humane Society ↗
  • Who funds THE ANNA SCHINDLER FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Avista FoundationWA25.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Innovia Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Roy and Leona Nelson Foundation · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gustavel Wynn Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gustavel Wynn Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 38 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gustavel Wynn’s filings →

More from the funding graph