Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

The Gruver Fund

To support double "h" hole in the woods ranch, lake luzerne, ny; to support charitable, educational, religious, scientific and literary purposes.

$209k
Granted FY2019
6
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$111k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172019.

Recreation & Sports$352kReligion$181kEducation$177kArts & Culture$15kPhilanthropy$2kInternational$2kYouth Development$680
02FY2019 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2019

  • Under $10k3 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $30k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $176k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$51k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH$110,530
FIRST REFORMED CHURCH$65,000
PENN STATE LEADERSHIP PROGRAM$30,000
SAGE COLLEGES$2,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SCHENECTADY INC$340
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–19) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 52% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%PENN STATE LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $75k → 16%DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH: $162k → 10%SAGE COLLEGES: $2k → 11%MUSEUM OF INNOVATION AND SCIENCE: $800 → 12%SCHENECTADY FOUNDATION: $1k → 14%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $1k → 14%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY: $1k → 17%NEW BRUNSWICK THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $300 → 8%PENN STATE LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $50k → 16%DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH: $111k → 10%MUSEUM OF INNOVATION AND SCIENCE: $240 → 12%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK INC: $1k → 14%CLARKSON UNIVERSITY: $10k → 18%PENN STATE LEADERSHIP PROGRAM: $30k → 16%DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH: $80k → 10%FIRST REFORMED CHURCH: $80k → 12%FIRST REFORMED CHURCH: $65k → 12%FIRST REFORMED CHURCH: $35k → 12%PROCTORS THEATER: $10k → 12%PROCTORS THEATER: $3k → 12%EMPIRE YOUTH ORCHESTRA: $500 → 12%CITY MISSION: $500 → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$723k · 8 repeat orgs$6k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
5

Total granted

$723k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
+7%

Still filing today

75%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2019, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19
Arts & CultureEducationRecreation & SportsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DH
    DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $352k · revenue +21%
  • AC
    ARTS CENTER AND THEATRE OF SCHENECTADY INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $13k · revenue +29%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK
    2× · 2018–2019 · $2k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • TS
    THE SCHENECTADY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +7%
  • MILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -49%
  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue -12%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
2
Syracuse University

Organization's missionas a university with the capacity to attract and engage the best scholars from around the world, yet small enough to support a personalized and academically rigorous student experience, syracuse university faculty and…

Education
3
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia

University of the sciences prepares students to become leaders, innovators, and skilled practitioners in the sciences, the health professions, and related disciplines. we deliver excellence in teaching, research, and service through a safe…

4
North Carolina Symphony Society Inc

To be north carolina's state orchestra, an orchestra achieving the highest level of artistic quality and performance standards, and embracing its dual legacies of statewide service and music education.

Arts & Culture
5
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
9
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

10
Bronx Charter School for Excellence

Excellence community schools prepares young people in new york city and stamford to compete for admission to and succeed in top public, private and parochial high schools by cultivating their intellectual, artistic, social, emotional, and…

Education
11
Heckscher Museum

Museum has a mission to create opportunties for everyone to experience art that broadens understanding of the past, fosters community connections to the present, and creates diverse possbilities for the future.

Arts & Culture
12
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Clubs of Schenectady Inc and the most unlike its peers is City Mission of Schenectady. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

DOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC — $352,060 · Recreation & SportsDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INCFIRST REFORMED CHURCH — $180,000 · OtherFIRST REFORMED CHURCHPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY — $155,000 · OtherPENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY+2 more — $800 · OtherCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $20,000 · EducationRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationARTS CENTER AND THEATRE OF SCHENECTADY INC — $12,500 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF INNOVATION AND SCIENCE — $1,040 · Arts & CultureMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK — $2,000 · InternationalTHE SCHENECTADY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION — $1,000 · Human ServicesBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SCHENECTADY INC — $680 · Youth Development
Recreation & Sports$352,060Other$335,800Education$22,000Arts & Culture$15,040International$2,000Philanthropy$1,000Human Services$1,000Youth Development$680

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetDOUBLE H HOLE IN THE WOODS RANCH INC — $352,060 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCLARKSON UNIVERSITY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetARTS CENTER AND THEATRE OF SCHENECTADY INC — $12,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetRUSSELL SAGE COLLEGE — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHEASTERN NEW YORK — $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMUSEUM OF INNOVATION AND SCIENCE — $1,040 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SCHENECTADY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMILWAUKEE SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE GREATER CAPITAL REGION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SCHENECTADY INC — $680 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEMPIRE STATE YOUTH ORCHESTRA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region IncNY24× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for the Greater Capital Region Inc · Mvp Health Plan Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · The Carlilian Foundation · The Schenectady Foundation · Neil Jane William Estelle Golub Family Foundation Inc · Pioneer Bank Charitable Foundation · Price Chopper's Golub Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gruver Fund funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Gruver Fund?

    Find your warmest path to The Gruver Fund through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2019, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph