Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Grubman Compton Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$863k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$392k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Education$5.4MHealth$1.6MReligion$550kPhilanthropy$174kFood & Nutrition$163kEnvironment$151kArts & Culture$149kHousing & Shelter$106kOther$0
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $111k
  • $250k+2 grants · $692k
$50,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
US NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOCIATION & FOUNDATION$391,667
OVERLOOK FOUNDATION$300,000
GOLDMAN SACHS Philanthropy Fund$61,432
LEADVILLE TRAIL 100 LEGAC$50,000
CHRIST CHURCH SUMMIT$25,000
NORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOL$20,000
Marine Corps Scholarship Foundation$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–23, $9k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GATHER: $5k → 5%BRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $1k → 10%BRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $1k → 10%BRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $1k → 10%BRIDGES OUTREACH INC: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
MN
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
TN
DC
OK
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$7.8M · 22 repeat orgs$748k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +95% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.

22 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
29

Total granted

$7.8M
$341k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+95%
+37%

Still filing today

77%
52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 49% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $407k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UN
    US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $2.8M · revenue +41%
  • OF
    OVERLOOK FOUNDATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +121%
  • IG
    ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD
    2× · 2019–2020 · $150k · revenue +257%

Funded once

  • HS
    HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue -32%
  • MC
    MARINE CORPS RELIEF SOCIETY
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • RI
    RESOLVE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +49%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
2
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

3
MRIGlobal

To improve the lives of people through innovative scientific and engineering research.

Science & Tech
4
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
5
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

6
Wildlands Trust Inc

The wildlands trust works throughout southeastern massachusetts to conserve and permanently protect native habitats, farmland, and lands of high ecologic and scenic value that serve to keep our communities healthy and our residents…

Environment
7
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

8
Oceana Inc

To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.

Environment
9
Marine Biological Laboratory

The Marine Biological Laboratory (MBL) is a world-renowned center for biological discovery and training that is notably affiliated with more than 60 Nobel Prize winners. Research is conducted by full-time faculty as well as hundreds of the…

Science & Tech
10
Governors Island Corporation

The governors island corporation, doing business as the trust for governors island, is the 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organization created by the city of new york and charged with the planning, redevelopment and ongoing operations of 150…

Animals
11
Internet Society Foundation

At the internet society foundation, we focus on funding initiatives that strengthen the internet in function and reach so that it can effectively serve all people. our work advances the vision of the internet society (isoc): the internet…

International
12
Island Hospital Foundation

The mission of the foundation is to raise funds to support island health and its commitment to community health in and around anacortes, washington.

Unclassified

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Good Sports Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fairmount Fire Company No 1. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Health CentersEducation Equity LeadershipVeteran Support ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Classical Music EnsemblesProfessional Ballet Compani…Elementary Literacy TutoringFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Pantries & AssistanceLand Conservation Organizat…Community FoundationsCommunity Arts OrganizationsGovernment Accountability R…Youth Sports Booster Organi…Urban Agriculture & Food Ac…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%6%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%7%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%51%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/38
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,527

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
28/36
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $2,798,333 · EducationUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INCUNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOC — $391,667 · EducationUNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOC+5 more — $38,000 · EducationNORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOL — $2,191,000 · OtherNORTHFIELD MT HERMON SCHOOLCHRIST CHURCH SUMMIT — $542,500 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH SUMMITLEADVILLE TRAIL 100 LEGACY FOUNDATION — $116,000 · Other+32 more — $361,720 · Other+32 moreOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $1,538,500 · HealthOVERLOOK FOUNDATION+4 more — $78,500 · HealthLEADVILLE TRAIL 100 LEGACY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC — $61,432 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF MVYRADIO INC — $18,167 · PhilanthropyLEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $12,350 · PhilanthropyISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD — $150,000 · Food & NutritionISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION — $100,000 · Housing & ShelterNature For Justice — $60,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Environment
Education$3,228,000Other$3,211,220Health$1,617,000Philanthropy$191,949Food & Nutrition$150,000Housing & Shelter$100,000Environment$85,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUS NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC — $2,798,333 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetOVERLOOK FOUNDATION — $1,538,500 over 9y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOC — $391,667 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD — $150,000 over 2y, 5.8% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION — $100,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLEADVILLE TRAIL 100 LEGACY INC — $100,000 over 2y, 5.0% of budgetNature For Justice — $60,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHEAD STRONG PROJECT INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRESOLVE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGOOD SPORTS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetINTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOCIATION - COLORADO — $21,500 over 4y, 6.7% of budgetGUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetFRIENDS OF MVYRADIO INC — $18,167 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetMARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY FOUNDATION INC — $12,350 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTrustees of Tufts College — $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetREADWORKSINC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWILDERNESS WORKSHOP — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFAIRMOUNT FIRE COMPANY NO 1 — $5,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetGather — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARNEGIE HALL CORPORATION — $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBRIDGES OUTREACH INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FOOD BANK OF WESTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE HIGH LINE INC — $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRIT AND GRATITUDE WRESTLING ACADEMY — $1,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetOUR HOUSE FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MILTON H ERICKSON FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFE TIME FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALVIN AILEY DANCE FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds US NAVAL ACADEMY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds OVERLOOK FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY ALUMNI ASSOC
  • Who funds ISLAND GROWN INITIATIVE LTD
  • Who funds ISLAND HOUSING TRUST CORPORATION
  • Who funds LEADVILLE TRAIL 100 LEGACY INC
  • Who funds GS DONOR ADVISED PHILANTHROPY FUND FOR WEALTH MANAGEMENT INC
  • Who funds Nature For Justice
  • Who funds HEAD STRONG PROJECT INC
  • Who funds RESOLVE INC
  • Who funds GOOD SPORTS INC
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL MOUNTAIN BICYCLING ASSOCIATION - COLORADO
  • Who funds GUNNISON VALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MVYRADIO INC
  • Who funds MARINE CORPS SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LEGACY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Trustees of Tufts College
  • Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY
  • Who funds READWORKSINC
  • Who funds THE BROOKLYN HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds WILDERNESS WORKSHOP
  • Who funds FAIRMOUNT FIRE COMPANY NO 1
  • Who funds Gather

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Colorado Gives FoundationCO13.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Grubman Compton Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 80%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Bridges Outreach Inc25% of income from government
  • Trustees of Tufts College13% of income from government
  • Island Housing Trust Corporation1% of income from government
  • Friends of Mvyradio Inc1% of income from government
  • Island Grown Initiative Ltd0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph