Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Grosevnor Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$302k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$882kHealth$278kArts & Culture$201kReligion$166kRecreation & Sports$125kSocial Science$25kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $4k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $82k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $216k
$30,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOXG1 RESEARCH FOUNDATION$116,128
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$100,000
Individual grant recipient$31,900
MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER$30,000
NIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$20,000
TEMPLE BETH DAVID$2,500
FIT KIDS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 57% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PENN NATIONAL GAMING FOUNDATION: $100k → 11%GOVERNORS CUP CHARITIES: $4k → 11%OSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $10k → 8%SPECTRUM LABORATORY: $50k → 14%FOXG1 RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $116k → 6%HILLEL INTERNATIONAL: $18k → 14%RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL: $25k → 15%GOVERNORS CUP CHARITIES: $4k → 11%MILKEN INSTITUTE: $25k → 14%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $32k → 7%ASCEND FOUNDATION: $5k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $30k → 15%GOVERNORS CUP CHARITIES: $4k → 11%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $22k → 7%FOUR FREEDOM PARK CONSERVANCY: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 15%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $16k → 7%FOUR FREEDOM PARK CONSERVANCY: $10k → 17%MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER: $15k → 15%PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL: $285k → 7%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $14k → 7%FOUR FREEDOM PARK CONSERVANCY: $5k → 17%NIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $20k → 15%PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL: $55k → 7%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $14k → 7%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%NIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL: $50k → 7%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $14k → 7%ABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL: $10k → 17%NIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $10k → 15%PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL: $33k → 7%TEMPLE ADAS ISRAEL: $4k → 7%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA: $10k → 7%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%NEW YORK UNIVERSITY: $50k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH JACOB: $12k → 7%PLAYRIGHTS HORIZON: $50k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH JACOB: $6k → 7%PLAYRIGHTS HORIZON: $40k → 17%CONGREGATION BETH JACOB: $5k → 7%PLAYRIGHTS HORIZON: $35k → 17%PLAYRIGHTS HORIZON: $25k → 17%PLAYRIGHTS HORIZON: $20k → 17%PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZON: $20k → 17%THE NEW GROUP: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.3M · 10 repeat orgs$404k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +44% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
14

Total granted

$1.3M
$285k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+44%

Still filing today

40%
93%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 61% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CulturePhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentReligionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $426k · revenue +49%
  • NY
    New York University
    5× · 2019–2024 · $400k · revenue +51%
  • PH
    PLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $190k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • PE
    PENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +20% · 27% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • RE
    RANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue +33%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
2
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
3
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

4
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
5
Phillips Exeter Academy

Unite goodness and knowledge and inspire youth from every quarter to lead purposeful lives. [text in quotations is taken from the academy's deed of gift, drafted in 1781] knowledge and goodness "above all, it is expected that the attention…

Education
6
Princeton International School of Mathematics and Science Inc

The purpose of the school is to promote, advance and sponsor charitable and educational activities.

Education
7
The Philadelphia School

The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.

8
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
9
Masters School

The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.

10
Hillel the Foundation for Jewish Campus Life At the Penn State University

To enrich the lives of jewish and undergraduate students so that they may enrich the jewish people and the world. penn state hillel's student leaders, professionals, and lay leaders are dedicated to creating a pluralistic, welcoming, and…

11
Bar Ilan University in Israel Inc

Biu produces students who excel in the sciences, humanities, law, engineering, business & the arts.

12
Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania

The trustees of the university of pennsylvania (the "university") sees itself as having a public service mission. in such regard, the university aims to provide a rich and diverse educational environment for its students; to pioneer…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys & Girls Clubs of the Peninsula and the most unlike its peers is Penn Entertainment Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/19
Grantees still filing
17/19
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL — $426,439 · EducationTHE PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOLNew York University — $400,000 · EducationNew York University+4 more — $55,541 · Education+4 moreIndividual grant recipient — $118,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $60,000 · OtherMOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENT…Individual grant recipient — $50,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipie…NIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $40,000 · OtherNIKLAUS CHILDREN'S HOSPI…CONGREGATION BETH JACOB — $26,404 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH JACOBFOUR FREEDOM PARK CONSERVANCY — $25,000 · OtherFOUR FREEDOM PARK CONSER…THE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $25,000 · OtherTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE+4 more — $18,500 · OtherPLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC — $190,000 · Arts & CulturePLAYWRIGHTS H…THE NEW GROUP INC — $10,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $500 · Arts & CultureFOXG1 Research Inc — $116,128 · HealthPENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION — $100,000 · PhilanthropyGOVERNOR'S CUP CHARITIES — $12,000 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $18,000 · Religion
Education$881,980Other$363,504Arts & Culture$200,500Health$116,128Philanthropy$112,000Youth Development$20,000Religion$18,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE PHILLIPS BROOKS SCHOOL — $426,439 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetNew York University — $400,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPLAYWRIGHTS HORIZONS INC — $190,000 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetFOXG1 Research Inc — $116,128 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetPENN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetRANSOM EVERGLADES SCHOOL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MILKEN INSTITUTE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAVENSWOOD EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $18,541 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE — $18,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOVERNOR'S CUP CHARITIES — $12,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetOSHMAN FAMILY JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FIT KIDS FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetABRAHAM JOSHUA HESCHEL SCHOOL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW GROUP INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAscend Foundation Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPOINT FOUNDATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARDES INSTITUTE OF JEWISH STUDIES NORTH AMERICA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF THE EAST END I — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN15.5× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Grosevnor Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Grosevnor Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Grosevnor Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph