Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Grier Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$54k
Granted FY2025still arriving
16
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$19k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$203kReligion$132kCommunity Improvement$64kHealth$7kHuman Services$4kArts & Culture$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 16 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k13 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$315k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$19,000
PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE$11,000
ERSKINE COLLEGE$10,000
THORNWELL HOME & SCHOOL$6,400
BONCLARKEN CONFERENCE CENTER$3,500
PRESBYTERIAN HERITAGE CENTER$1,000
CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES$1,000
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FDN$1,000
JEKYLL ISLAND UNITED METHODIST CHUR$250
VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY$100
WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY$100
BETHANY ASSOCIATE REFORMED PRESBYTE$100
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH LYNCHBURG$100
COLLEGE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$100
CLOVER ASSOCIATE REFORMED PRESBYTER$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY: $1k → 8%WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY: $500 → 8%WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY: $250 → 8%WESTMINSTER - CANTERBURY: $100 → 8%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: $1k → 10%CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES: $500 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$400k · 17 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 2 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

$400k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+48%

Still filing today

41%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureHousing & ShelterReligionFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE
    6× · 2020–2025 · $131k · revenue +11%
  • EC
    Erskine College and Theological Seminary
    5× · 2020–2025 · $23k · revenue +14%
  • PH
    PRESBYTERIAN HERITAGE CENTER
    4× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • DW
    DUE WEST ASSOCIATE REFORMED PRESBYT
    one grant, 2020 · $5k
  • GH
    GREENVILLE HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $3k
  • PA
    PRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUSICIANSgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +131%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of the Ozarks

True to our christian heritage, we prepare students from diverse religious, cultural, educational and economic backgrounds to live life fully.

Education
2
Regent University

Regent University serves as a center of Christian thought and action to provide excellent education through a Biblical perspective and global context equipping Christian leaders to change the world.

3
Asbury Theological Seminary

Asbury Theological Seminary is a community called to prepare theologically educated, sanctified, Spirit-filled men and women to evangelize and to spread scriptural holiness throughout the world through the love of Jesus Christ, in the…

Education
4
Northeastern Seminary

Northeastern seminary strives to be a vibrant source for christian theological formation whose students are formed in a biblical vision of gracious christianity and impact wholeness to the world in an expansive array of vocations and…

Education
5
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
6
Reformed University Inc

Provide education in theology, divinity, religious education, ministerial training, business and organizational leadership.

Education
7
Barclay College

The mission of barclay college is to prepare students in a bible-centered environment for effective christian life, service, and leadership.

Education
8
Greenville College

Greenville college d/b/a greenville university empowers students for lives of character and service through a transforming christ-centered education in the liberal arts, sciences, and professional studies.

Education
9
Westminster College

The mission of westminster college is to help students develop competencies, commitments, and characteristics which have distinguished human beings at their best. see continuation on schedule o.the liberal arts tradition is the foundation…

Education
10
Union University

Union university provides christ-centered education that promotes excellence and character development in service to church and society.

Education
11
Spartanburg Methodist College

SMC Delivers an exceptional education that fuses the empowerment of the liberal arts with crucial career skills. Our mission is to equip our students with the knowledge, skills, virtues, and mindset needed to thrive personally, create…

Education
12
Central Christian College of the Bible

Central christian college of the bible (central) exists to develop servant-leaders for the church. as a traditional undergraduate bible college of the restoration movement, central equips faithful men and women for leadership ministry.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Presbyterian College and the most unlike its peers is Presbyterian Association of Musicians. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
9/11
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $109,000 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBONCLARKEN CONFERENCE CENTER INC — $59,750 · OtherBONCLARKEN CONFERENCE CENTER INCTHORNWELL HOME & SCHOOL — $39,900 · OtherTHORNWELL HOME & SCHOOL+15 more — $27,700 · Other+15 morePRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE — $131,000 · Housing & ShelterPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGEErskine College and Theological Seminary — $23,000 · EducationHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE — $2,000 · EducationVanderbilt University — $1,000 · EducationPRESBYTERIAN HERITAGE CENTER — $10,804 · ReligionCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $4,500 · Human ServicesWESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION — $1,850 · Human ServicesVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,100 · Arts & CulturePRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUSICIANS — $1,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR LAY MINISTRIES INC — $250 · Food & Nutrition
Other$236,350Housing & Shelter$131,000Education$26,000Religion$10,804Human Services$6,350Arts & Culture$2,100Food & Nutrition$250

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE — $131,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetErskine College and Theological Seminary — $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN HERITAGE CENTER — $10,804 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetCENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES — $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE — $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION — $1,850 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetVIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,100 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUSICIANS — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVanderbilt University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTER FOR LAY MINISTRIES INC — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INDIANA — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN COLLEGE
  • Who funds Erskine College and Theological Seminary
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN HERITAGE CENTER
  • Who funds CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES
  • Who funds HAMPDEN-SYDNEY COLLEGE
  • Who funds WESTMINSTER CANTERBURY CORPORATION
  • Who funds VIRGINIA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
  • Who funds PRESBYTERIAN ASSOCIATION OF MUSICIANS
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University
  • Who funds CENTER FOR LAY MINISTRIES INC
  • Who funds THE PRESBYTERIAN FOUNDATION OF COLUMBUS INDIANA

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA7.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Grier Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Grier Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Grier Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph