Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Gregory Hackett Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$40k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$253kEducation$105kEnvironment$37kPhilanthropy$33kInternational$29kReligion$25kYouth Development$8kHealth$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $1k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$40,000
NATIONAL FIRST LADIES LIBRARY$1,000
STAN HYETT HALL & GARDENS$430
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–22, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%GRACE HOUSE AKRON: $6k → 13%GRACE HOUSE AKRON: $500 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$461k · 9 repeat orgs$13k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
15

Total granted

$461k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-3%
+23%

Still filing today

44%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentPublic Safety & DisasterRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $253k
  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY
    3× · 2017–2021 · $59k
  • KS
    KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2022–2024 · $46k · revenue -55%

Funded once

  • O
    OASIS
    one grant, 2020 · $2k
  • TA
    THE AOPA FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +85%
  • C
    COUNTRYSIDE
    one grant, 2019 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Akron Zoological Park

We connect your life to wildlife while inspiring lifelong learning and conservation action.

Animals
2
The Akron Zoological Foundation Inc

The mission of the akron zoological foundation, inc. is to directly benefit and provide support for programs, projects and to further the mission of the akron zoological park in conservation, education and serving the community.

Animals
3
Greater Akron Chamber Foundation

Promote business & education in the akron area

4
Akron Parks Collaborative

To engage the akron, ohio community around the creation and sustainability of vibrant public spaces within the city of akron. we foster and support neighborhood park advocates by enabling them to meet their goals, partner with the city and…

Recreation & Sports
5
Akron Development Corporation

The akron development corporation was organized to support economic development initiatives in the city of akron, particularly through the former akron global business accelerator and to secure state of ohio funding for technology-based…

Community Improvement
6
Cleveland Botanical Garden

The cleveland botanical garden connects people with the wonder, beauty, and value of trees and plants, to inspire action for healthy communities.

Environment
7
Greater Akron Chamber

To promote business in the tri-county area

8
Akron Bar Foundation

The foundation supports the activities of the akron bar association under section 509(a)(3). the foundation also acts as the charitable arm of the akron bar association and provides scholarships to deserving law students.

Health
9
Akron-Canton Regional Foodbank

The mission of the akron-canton regional foodbank is to lead a collaborative network that empowers people to experience healthy and hunger-free lives. we distribute food to feed people and we advocate, engage and convene our community in…

Food & Nutrition
10
Akron Bar Association

To enhance the quality of law and justice through community service and to maintain the integrity of the profession.

11
The Holden Arboretum

The holden arboretum connects people with the wonder, beauty, and value of trees and plants, to inspire action for healthy communities.

Environment
12
Glen Foerd Conservation Corporation

Glen foerd stewards an eclectic riverfront estate for the enjoyment and educational benefit of the community. drawing from the estate's architecture, art, material culture, and history-as well as its gardens and waterways-glen foerd…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Akron Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Arco Murray Charitable Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY — $252,700 · OtherSALVATION ARMYKENT STATE UNIVERSITY — $59,360 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITYHOPE FOR HONDURAN CHILDREN — $29,030 · OtherHOPE FOR HONDURAN CHILDRENFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH — $24,842 · OtherFAITH LUTHERAN CHURCH+11 more — $14,550 · OtherKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $45,500 · EducationKENT STATE…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $25,000 · EnvironmentTHE AKRON GARDEN CLUB — $10,450 · EnvironmentAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $2,250 · PhilanthropyGRACE HOUSE AKRON INC — $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 · Public Safety & DisasterSummit Choral Society Inc — $882 · Arts & CultureSTAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC — $430 · Arts & CultureCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $500 · Recreation & Sports
Other$380,482Education$46,500Environment$35,450Philanthropy$32,250Human Services$6,500Public Safety & Disaster$1,500Arts & Culture$1,312Recreation & Sports$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $45,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetAKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $25,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AKRON GARDEN CLUB — $10,450 over 3y, 18% of budgetGRACE HOUSE AKRON INC — $6,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTHE AOPA FOUNDATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGABRAIL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds KENT STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds AKRON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA
  • Who funds THE AKRON GARDEN CLUB
  • Who funds GRACE HOUSE AKRON INC
  • Who funds THE AOPA FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds GABRAIL FAMILY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds ARCO MURRAY CHARITABLE CORPORATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL FIRST LADIES LIBRARY
  • Who funds Summit Choral Society Inc
  • Who funds CENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC
  • Who funds STAN HYWET HALL & GARDENS INC
  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Akron Community FoundationOH17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Akron Community Foundation · The Patricia & J Harvey Graves Family Foundation · The Richard S and Alita Rogers Family Foundation · Lloyd L & Louise K Smith Foundation · The Welty Family Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Gregory Hackett Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph