Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Gregory and Vera Kiernan Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$102k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$537kHealth$115kArts & Culture$73kYouth Development$60kInternational$57kReligion$57kEnvironment$38kHuman Services$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k19 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $73k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$720k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CROSSING THRESHOLDS INC$25,000
DESTINATION COLLEGE$15,000
SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY$13,120
POINT O WOODS FOUNDATION$10,000
STONY KNOLL YOUTH SERVICES$10,000
HARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES$5,000
THE SHEFA SCHOOL$5,000
CORNELIA CONNELLY CENTER$2,500
UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA$2,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING$1,500
CHURCH AT POINT OWOODS$1,250
FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION$1,000
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$1,000
THE EYE-BANK FOR SIGHT RESTORATION$1,000
RISE FOR REW$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CENTER FOR SAFETY AND CHANGE: $1k → 14%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $3k → 17%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $1k → 17%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $1k → 17%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $1k → 17%AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING: $1k → 17%THE JEWISH BOARD: $25k → 17%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $26k → 9%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $15k → 9%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $11k → 9%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $11k → 9%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $10k → 9%DESTINATION COLLEGE: $10k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MT
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
VA
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$856k · 34 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +31% for those funded once.

34 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

34
42

Total granted

$856k
$144k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+31%

Still filing today

65%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCrime & LegalRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH
    6× · 2019–2024 · $261k · revenue +57%
  • DC
    DESTINATION COLLEGE
    6× · 2018–2024 · $83k · revenue +230%
  • CS
    CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $48k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • NS
    NEWBURGH SAN MIGUEL PROGRAM
    one grant, 2017 · $27k · revenue -99%
  • JB
    JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue +1%
  • TW
    The Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospitalgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
2
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
6
Stony Brook Orthopedic Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Childrens Services University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
9
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
10
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fordham University; the most unlike its peers is Point O'woods Volunteer Fire Company. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

49 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 49 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
47/49
Grantees still filing
40/49
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH: $260,620 · EducationSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGHCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $48,000 · EducationCANTERBURY SCHOOL INCCROSSING THRESHOLDS INC: $45,000 · EducationCROSSING THRESHOLDS INCNEWBURGH SAN MIGUEL PROGRAM: $26,750 · EducationNEWBURGH SAN MIGUEL PROGRAM+9 more: $42,321 · Education+9 moreSTONY KNOLL YOUTH SERVICES: $60,000 · OtherSTONY KNOLL YOUTH SERVICESHARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIES: $31,500 · OtherHARLEM VILLAGE ACADEMIESST JOHN & ST MARY PARISH: $30,000 · OtherST JOHN & ST MARY PARISHUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA: $22,500 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIACORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDUCATION: $20,000 · OtherCORNELIA CONNELY CENTER FOR EDU…RENEW & REBUILD-ARCHDIOCESE OF NY: $15,000 · OtherNEWBURGH SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY: $11,000 · OtherUNION COLLEGE: $10,500 · OtherSTAND WITH UKRAINE: $10,100 · OtherFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 · Other+37 more: $63,750 · Other+37 moreDESTINATION COLLEGE: $82,500 · Human ServicesDESTINATION …JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesJEWISH BOARD…THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING TREATMENT AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING: $6,500 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN…+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesPOINT O'WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $63,000 · PhilanthropyROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $13,500 · Philanthropy+2 more: $1,150 · PhilanthropyThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital: $20,000 · HealthTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $14,000 · HealthENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER: $9,400 · HealthNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $6,500 · HealthThe Gardner Marks Foundation Inc: $3,500 · HealthCHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC: $2,150 · Health+6 more: $5,750 · HealthBEE THE CHANGE INC: $37,500 · EnvironmentPOINT O'WOODS VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $11,700 · Public Safety & Disaster+1 more: $250 · Public Safety & Disaster
Education$422,691Other$284,350Human Services$115,000Philanthropy$77,650Health$61,300Environment$37,500Public Safety & Disaster$11,950

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH: $260,620 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetDESTINATION COLLEGE: $82,500 over 6y, 6.6% of budgetPOINT O'WOODS FOUNDATION INC: $63,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetCANTERBURY SCHOOL INC: $48,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSING THRESHOLDS INC: $45,000 over 5y, 1.7% of budgetBEE THE CHANGE INC: $37,500 over 5y, 4.3% of budgetNEWBURGH SAN MIGUEL PROGRAM: $26,750 over 1y, 4.6% of budgetJEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION: $14,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFairfield University: $13,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPOINT O'WOODS VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY: $11,700 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetAMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES: $10,821 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER: $9,400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $8,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION: $6,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING TREATMENT AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING: $6,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetHORACE GREELEY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $5,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSHEFA SCHOOL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFordham University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Gardner Marks Foundation Inc: $3,500 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPPAQUA VOLUNTEER AMBULANCE CORP INC: $2,150 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetThe Eye-Bank for Sight Restoration Inc DBA The Eye-Bank of New York: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE AMERICA INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMISSION MSA: $2,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAmerican Friends of Migdal OHR: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCENTER FOR SAFETY & CHANGE INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAchilles International Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHAPPAQUA SUMMER SCHOLARSHIP PROGRAM: $1,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetRISE FOR REW INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBIGS & LITTLES NYC MENTORING INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEMPIRE DRAGONS NYC INC: $1,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SOMO PROJECT: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNETWORK FOR GOOD: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRAGON KIM FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITIZENS FOR JUVENILE JUSTICE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAN MIGUEL ACADEMY OF NEWBURGH ↗
  • Who funds DESTINATION COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds POINT O'WOODS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CANTERBURY SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSING THRESHOLDS INC ↗
  • Who funds BEE THE CHANGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEWBURGH SAN MIGUEL PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH BOARD OF FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds The Winifred Masterson Burke Rehabilitation Hospital ↗
  • Who funds THE FIBROLAMELLAR CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ROBIN HOOD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Fairfield University ↗
  • Who funds POINT O'WOODS VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds AMHERST COLLEGE TRUSTEES ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZALAH INC ↗
  • Who funds ENGLEWOOD HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN WESTCHESTER HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE FOR STUTTERING TREATMENT AND PROFESSIONAL TRAINING ↗
  • Who funds HORACE GREELEY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds SHEFA SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds Fordham University ↗
  • Who funds The Gardner Marks Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Heffernan Family Foundation · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Express Foundation · California Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Gregory and Vera Kiernan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Gregory and Vera Kiernan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Fairfield University: 1% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees: 0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Gregory and Vera Kiernan Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Gregory and Vera Kiernan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Gregory and Vera Kiernan’s filings →

More from the funding graph